Lindsey Graham: We're Calling in All Officials Who Signed Carter Page FISA Warrant to Testify

Fisagate biggest scandal ever
Ooooooh look! Fisagate! Another shiny object for the cult to gape open mouthed at!

Go ahead, have your fun. And when the truth about your boy comes out, you'll look for someone else to blame besides the FBI.

Meh, a little Fascism never hurt anyone. So what if the Obama Administration spied on Trump, right?
I actually think we need to pass a new law and make it applicable to Obama Retroactively, so he won't go to jail for what he did.

Here is the new law:

All Presidential Candidates shall be under 24-7 surveillance from the time they announce their candidacy, and everything they say and do will be live streamed to the whole world. Even when they go to the bathroom, shower, get dressed and go to bed.

All phone calls will be listened in to, every email read to the public, and every letter opened and read out loud.

We want to see how much they snore, when they fart or burp, how big of a shit they take, or if they have sex with their wives. We also want all their children to be under surveillance.

We'll call it the AntiChrist Act.
 
Last edited:
When's donnie releasing the unredacted version?
What's that got to do with getting to the bottom of who started it all, and why they started it all ??

Started what?

Dang, is this where you play stupid....oh, you're not playing?
 
This thing needs to be examined. Think about it, can we trust the FBI to handle espionage issues if they fall for forged documents concocted by foreign agents to influence a presidential election? You almost gotta laugh that the crazy angry left got away with accusing Trump of "collusion" with foreign agents while they were up to their asses in foreign based propaganda.

The Dossier has all been verified - everything but the pee tape. So everything in your post is a lie.

And we haven't seen the Mueller Report. He filed over 100 charges against 22 individuals and corporation, so your assertions that the Russians didn't hack the DNC server, or coordinate with WikiLeaks to get Trump elected, is completely false. The evidence of that was filed in the indictments.

You almost gotta laugh that the crazy, desperate, Russian-loving Trumpbots are trying to claim that Trump has been exonerated, when we haven't even seen Mueller's report yet.

Dear lady, NOTHING in the fairy tale called the dossier was verified. You need to get better news sources. I am aware that some news sources claimed that parts of the dossier were verified; but they they we.re wrong. You really need to get your news from The Drudge Report.

For your information, Steele himself admitted, under oath, that nothing in the dossier was verified. He further claimed that the documents were never intended to be presented as truthful.

“According to Steele’s courtroom version, the dossier is merely a compilation of bits of “raw intelligence” that were “unverified” and that he passed along because they “warranted further investigation” — i.e., not because he could vouch for their truthfulness. He gave them to American and British government officials, he maintains, only because they raised potential national-security threats, not because they actually established any such threats. That, he now says, was for government investigators to figure out. In sum, Steele’s defamation defense is not that what he wrote was true but that his reports “must be critically viewed in light of the purpose for and circumstances in which the information was collected.” There is laugh-out-loud stuff here: Steele’s declamation of his profound commitment to discretion and secrecy lest his “raw,” “unverified,” and possibly false reports defame anyone. He claimed that he and Fusion GPS had a solemn agreement not to disclose his work . . . except for whenever they decided to disclose his work — including to Fusion’s clients and to major press organs during the stretch run of a contentious presidential election. But not to worry: These discussions were “off the record,” a term Steele claims to have understood to mean “to be used for the purpose of further research but would not be published or attributed.”

Read more at: Steele Dossier: Obama Officials Politicized Unverified ‘Intelligence’ | National Review

Steele also admitted that most of the dossier was based upon on-line comments on what appeared to be a chat/gossip forum

“Transcripts of the closed door deposition of Christopher Steele, the former British spy, reveals he used online comments from a now-defunct CNN website as his major source to compile his infamous “Trump dossier.”

“According to the transcripts, Steele used a website called CNN iReport to back up his wild anti-Trump theories for his 2009 dossier. He now claims he “wasn’t aware” the information he found on the site was an online community forum, and that poster’s comments had not been “checked for accuracy.”

Christopher Steele ADMITS He Based His Entire Dossier on Unverified ONLINE COMMENTS

CONCLUSION: Nothing in the dossier was verified. Further, Trump has been completely exonerated. Mueller found no evidence of collusion and the Attorney General ruled Trump did not obstruct justice. When an investigation finds no evidence of a crime, that is what normal people call exoneration.

Drudge Report
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:
right011.png
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate the Drudge Report Right Biased and Questionable due to promotion of propaganda and conspiracy theories, as well as for publishing fake news and the use of highly questionable sources.
Detailed Report
Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Poor Sources, Some Fake News
Country: USA
Drudge Report - Media Bias/Fact Check

National Review
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:
RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

  • Overall, we rate the National Review Right Biased based on story selection that always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to misleading claims and occasional use of poor sources.
Detailed Report
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA
National Review - Media Bias/Fact Check

American Liberty Report
Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.

Share:
right051.png
RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: MIXED

Notes: American Liberty Report is a news and opinion website that has a right wing bias in reporting. Most articles favor the right and are anti-left. There is moderate use of emotional loaded words in headlines such as: “Hypocrisy in Liberal Racism” and there is very little sourcing. American Liberty Report utilizes quotes vs. links, which makes it difficult to verify the context and facts of the information. We could not find any failed fact checks, but the lack of proper sourcing decreases the credibility of their writings. Overall, we rate American Liberty Report Right Biased based on story selection and Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing. (D. Van Zandt 10/5/2017)
American Liberty Report - Media Bias/Fact Check

* mueller's report has not been released & the summary was not mueller's. AND barr did not say nor quoted mueller as saying that trump was exhonerated from obstruction. quite the opposite.

THE FACTS: It was not a total vindication. Mueller’s exact words in the report, as quoted by the attorney general, say otherwise: “While this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

AP FACT CHECK: Mueller probe doesn't totally exonerate Trump
 
What's good for the goose...

Sure... let's take a long, hard look at the FISA -related activity that led up to the Mueller Investigation...

And, if we find wrongdoing there, then let's prosecute, as well...

It's only fair.

What FISA related activity led to Mueller?
How do those relate?
Mueller wouldn't be here if Trump hadn't fired Comey.
 
This thing needs to be examined. Think about it, can we trust the FBI to handle espionage issues if they fall for forged documents concocted by foreign agents to influence a presidential election? You almost gotta laugh that the crazy angry left got away with accusing Trump of "collusion" with foreign agents while they were up to their asses in foreign based propaganda.

The Dossier has all been verified - everything but the pee tape. So everything in your post is a lie.

And we haven't seen the Mueller Report. He filed over 100 charges against 22 individuals and corporation, so your assertions that the Russians didn't hack the DNC server, or coordinate with WikiLeaks to get Trump elected, is completely false. The evidence of that was filed in the indictments.

CalledXpertNotCool.jpg
 
When's donnie releasing the unredacted version?
What's that got to do with getting to the bottom of who started it all, and why they started it all ??

Started what?

Dang, is this where you play stupid....oh, you're not playing?

No, this is where you explain your stupid.

Anything?
 
There have been reports that the FBI may have been interested in Carter Page as early as 2012. Thus, there may have more than one FISA warrant. Apparently, these warrants only last for 90 days, so they have to be re-upped.

My comment should not be taken as a factual assertion, just that this idea has been raised. I know no more about it than anyone else on USMB does.
 
The FISA warrant application should be made 100% public, right libbies?
Yes.....so it begs the question, why hasn't donnie released it yet like he said he would...?
He actually cannot release it. Only Barr can, and only a summary. The Democrats passed legislation to protect Grand Juries, and people who were questioned and were innocent.

So it would be against The Law to release the full report. Just like it's against The Law to unmask US Citizens who are unintentional targets of a FISA surveillance warrant. By default all US Citizens are unintentional targets.

Maybe we should all be allowed to see Hillary's 33,000 email first.
 
There have been reports that the FBI may have been interested in Carter Page as early as 2012. Thus, there may have more than one FISA warrant. Apparently, these warrants only last for 90 days, so they have to be re-upped.

My comment should not be taken as a factual assertion, just that this idea has been raised. I know no more about it than anyone else on USMB does.
I think it was clear that there was more than on Fisa warrant. With at least one before the dossier was compiled. So for the gop, I think they should not be the ones opening cans of worms. Trump can probably gin up his base for the next two years making sophomore cracks about Schiff and claiming to be a deep state victim. Even though Mueller was the ultimate deep stater who apparently did not recommend he be indicted.

Also I don't see how Graham or anyone can compel a Fisa judge to testify, and I don't think he'd even try. His "claim" would be that the probable cause was basically falsely presented to the judge.
 
Fisagate biggest scandal ever
How and why?

What came from it?

Obama spied on a Presidential Campaign. No biggie

Hell that is nothing new, The Nazis did it all the time, from The Dog Catcher to The President of The Democratic Weimar Republic. The NEVER Spied on their own People Though. Weird, huh?

But what about Putin? What about Putin? Oh.....wait.

Chicago Tribune: Russia President Vladimir Putin says his government is not working with National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, and defended President Obama over his spying program — sort of. “How do I feel about Obama after Snowden’s revelations?” Putin said during a Thursday news conference in Russia. “I envy him, because he can get away with it.”

Putin: 'I Envy' Obama's Spy Program | Breitbart
 

Forum List

Back
Top