Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And he can take his amnesty loving asshat buddy, juan mclame with him.
RINO's like those wash outs is the reason the republican party faltered. They KNOW that. They also know that every time the republican party moves BACK TO IT'S ROOTS, they WIN. That's what they're trying to do now, without the help of WORMS like lindseed graham, but that's why the republicans are now enjoying better poll numbers ACROSS THE BOARD over dems.
HEY LINSEED, TAKE A HIKE YA FUCKIN' WEAK KNEED, SPINELESS, SELL OUT, WORM! Go join the dems since that's all you seem able to support ya FUCK!
And he can take his amnesty loving asshat buddy, juan mclame with him.
RINO's like those wash outs is the reason the republican party faltered. They KNOW that. They also know that every time the republican party moves BACK TO IT'S ROOTS, they WIN. That's what they're trying to do now, without the help of WORMS like lindseed graham, but that's why the republicans are now enjoying better poll numbers ACROSS THE BOARD over dems.
HEY LINSEED, TAKE A HIKE YA FUCKIN' WEAK KNEED, SPINELESS, SELL OUT, WORM! Go join the dems since that's all you seem able to support ya FUCK!
Actually, The Republican Party faltered because the majority of Americans (especially the younger generations) aren't buying what the GOP is selling.
It's amazing to me that you'd blame the RINOs for your problems but I guess you need a scapegoat huh?
Republicans blaming the RINOs for their problems is like Inmates in a prison blaming the guards for putting them there.
Obama is a radical leftist and a moron. He is anything but a moderate.
And he can take his amnesty loving asshat buddy, juan mclame with him.
RINO's like those wash outs is the reason the republican party faltered. They KNOW that. They also know that every time the republican party moves BACK TO IT'S ROOTS, they WIN. That's what they're trying to do now, without the help of WORMS like lindseed graham, but that's why the republicans are now enjoying better poll numbers ACROSS THE BOARD over dems.
HEY LINSEED, TAKE A HIKE YA FUCKIN' WEAK KNEED, SPINELESS, SELL OUT, WORM! Go join the dems since that's all you seem able to support ya FUCK!
Actually, The Republican Party faltered because the majority of Americans (especially the younger generations) aren't buying what the GOP is selling.
It's amazing to me that you'd blame the RINOs for your problems but I guess you need a scapegoat huh?
Republicans blaming the RINOs for their problems is like Inmates in a prison blaming the guards for putting them there.
"Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993."
Lindseed should know that Dem killed the process and any chance of reconciliation. I mean how intellectually dishonest is he?
OF course. Blame partisanship in the courts on Dems. What else is new? Of course there was a time when a nominee's political affiliation wasn't even an issue, just as the framers of the Constitution intended.
Lindsey Graham is still a conservative Republican, and as he implied, the current wave of over-the-top conservatism will soon become totally irrelevant in the political process, so you'd better get your heads out of your asses and start recognizing that COMPROMISE in Washington is the ONLY way to get anything done, whether it's something conservatives want or something liberals want. I for one am so happy that there still remain a few Republicans on Capitol Hill with some sanity left.
When we get back in power we're going to start a LeftWing Extremists List.
You display short sightedness when it comes to politics.For your answer, see:
McCain, John
His voting record is nearly identical to Lindseys, would you call him anything but a RINO?
BTW, the GoP never had people like me, I recognized them as frauds years ago, jsut as I recognize the dems as being the same.
John McCain is a Republican, its called being a moderate Republican but still a Republican. Just like how Barack Obama is a moderate Democrat. McCain isn't Conservative, Obama isn't Liberal.
This whole RINO BS is what drives Republicans to be Democrats or ends up getting sane moderate individuals voted out in primaries for the far right of the party. The Democrats are the smarter out of the two because they at least accept those who (for the most part) who don't align with their views always but will still caucus with them (See: Joe L, Blue Dog Democrats).
Right NOW the Dems are in accent mostly through GoP mistakes, NOT froma sudden 'love affair' with the left.
And yes, Obama is a liberal, in fact, he was THE most liberal senator in the senate, and in fact he is so far left many call him a socialist and budding communist.
He is not CLOSE to being a 'centrist' nor has he governed as a uniter, he is all about division as he constantly shows, ergo when his porkulus was in danger, he attacked a radio host to take the spotlight off him, and now he tries to 'blame' the GoP for 'blocking' his gov takeover of healthcare when the dems have the votes for it no matter what the GoP does.
As for the GoP being finished, let me clarify for you why you are shortsighted:
Just 5 years ago, there was serious talk of 'the permenent republican majority' in the House & senate.
Things change VERY quickly in US politics, they already have shifted heavily against the dems, they are in danger of losing the house and the super majority in the senate in the midterms, THIS is why Obama is trying to rush his agenda through, he knows it. The Blue dogs however know that pushing BO's agenda means they will pay for it at the polls, so they block him.
Lindsey is a half wit populist who wants to be in the spotlight, so he makes outragious comments that will cost him also at the ballot box, his stance on immigration cost him most of his conservative support already, this latest tirade should finsih him off.
For your answer, see:
McCain, John
His voting record is nearly identical to Lindseys, would you call him anything but a RINO?
BTW, the GoP never had people like me, I recognized them as frauds years ago, jsut as I recognize the dems as being the same.
John McCain is a Republican, its called being a moderate Republican but still a Republican. Just like how Barack Obama is a moderate Democrat. McCain isn't Conservative, Obama isn't Liberal.
This whole RINO BS is what drives Republicans to be Democrats or ends up getting sane moderate individuals voted out in primaries for the far right of the party. The Democrats are the smarter out of the two because they at least accept those who (for the most part) who don't align with their views always but will still caucus with them (See: Joe L, Blue Dog Democrats).
What?
Do you people just say whatever you want and expect it to be taken as fact?>
Obama is a radical leftist and a moron. He is anything but a moderate.
Obama is considered socialist to some of those on the right obviously, but to the rest of the world, he's moderate left at best. Obama supports many of Bush's former policies which aren't Liberal. He's against Gay Marriage, which is not a Liberal position. He may of been a Liberal senator but that's because he was really from a Democratic state. Since becoming President, he has moved progressively to the center on many issues in order to try and appease everyone.
Please Lindsaey, you aren't a conservative and you aren't fooling anyone. You need to join the democrap party with your buddy, the sphincter.
And he can take his amnesty loving asshat buddy, juan mclame with him.
RINO's like those wash outs is the reason the republican party faltered. They KNOW that. They also know that every time the republican party moves BACK TO IT'S ROOTS, they WIN. That's what they're trying to do now, without the help of WORMS like lindseed graham, but that's why the republicans are now enjoying better poll numbers ACROSS THE BOARD over dems.
HEY LINSEED, TAKE A HIKE YA FUCKIN' WEAK KNEED, SPINELESS, SELL OUT, WORM! Go join the dems since that's all you seem able to support ya FUCK!
And he can take his amnesty loving asshat buddy, juan mclame with him.
RINO's like those wash outs is the reason the republican party faltered. They KNOW that. They also know that every time the republican party moves BACK TO IT'S ROOTS, they WIN. That's what they're trying to do now, without the help of WORMS like lindseed graham, but that's why the republicans are now enjoying better poll numbers ACROSS THE BOARD over dems.
HEY LINSEED, TAKE A HIKE YA FUCKIN' WEAK KNEED, SPINELESS, SELL OUT, WORM! Go join the dems since that's all you seem able to support ya FUCK!
Actually, The Republican Party faltered because the majority of Americans (especially the younger generations) aren't buying what the GOP is selling.
It's amazing to me that you'd blame the RINOs for your problems but I guess you need a scapegoat huh?
Republicans blaming the RINOs for their problems is like Inmates in a prison blaming the guards for putting them there.
Actually, you missed the whole point of my post and never made any direct comment towards it. You just spewed forth your partisan hack regurgitation. Now whether or not you want to continue spewing liberal garbage or not and make yourself look like an even bigger idiot is up to you. But the fact of the matter is, the conservative voice in America is really getting traction. It's kicking the shit out of obama and what his screwed up minions in congress are doing.... right now! The majority... get that, the MAJORITY of Americans are now siding with the CONSERVATIVES! They do NOT like what the dumb ass little, lop eared, moron, community organizer, KENYAN has done SO FAR, and we, UNFORTUNATELY, have another three and half years to ENDURE his dishwater ass. The silver lining in this sows ear is that all you liberal jack offs will be voted out of power NEXT YEAR, so have your hay day now, because for you, conservatives are about to SLAM ON THE BRAKES, and then put it in REVERSE!
It's a fact, many MANY people that voted for barry are now VERY sorry they did. But we here on USMB know that you dedicated obama ASS KISSERS will NEVER admit really what kind of a FUCK UP he is. Well you know what? You don't have to.... we already know.
Lindsey Graham takes on conservatives
By: Manu Raju
July 24, 2009 04:17 AM EST
When Sen. Lindsey Graham announced his support for Sonia Sotomayor this week, right-wing radio talk show host Mark Levin said it was a sign that Graham is “unreliable ... as a thinker and a leader.”
Wendy Long, counsel for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, called it proof that Graham “still lacks courage, statesmanship and an understanding of the Constitution and rule of law.”
“May his antics get the attention they richly deserve.”
The response from Graham: Enjoy life in the minority.
In an interview with POLITICO Thursday, the South Carolina Republican defended his decision to back Sotomayor by laying out a broad critique of conservative activists who push “ideological purity” and refuse to cooperate with a Democratic Congress and White House.
“If we chase this attitude … that you have to say ‘no’ to every Democratic proposal, you can’t help the president ever, you can’t ever reach across the aisle, then I don’t want to be part of the movement because it’s a dead-end movement,” Graham said.
“I have no desire to be up here in an irrelevant status. I’m smart enough to know that this country doesn’t have a problem with conservatives. It has a problem with blind ideology. And those who are ideological-driven to a fault are never going to be able to take this party back into relevancy.”
While a handful of other GOP senators have said they’ll back Sotomayor when her nomination comes to the floor, Graham is the first Republican on the Judiciary Committee to support her.
He may be the only one. Not all of the Republicans on the committee have announced their views, but the two who would seem mostly likely to defect — Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), two veterans who have voted for every Supreme Court nominee they’ve faced in the Senate — have both expressed reservations about Sotomayor.
Hatch said that he’s “troubled” by her nomination, and Grassley said that “people take things into consideration now that they didn’t used to before.” He added: “So obviously, there are other things to consider than just qualifications.”
Graham said that Sotomayor is not the nominee he would have chosen.
But after questioning her extensively during her confirmation hearing — asking about everything from her views on abortion to the charge that she’s a “bully” on the bench — he said Sotomayor deserves his support because a review of her 17-year record proved she was well-qualified, her confirmation would not upset the ideological balance on the court, and Obama is entitled to some latitude in making his pick because he won the election.
Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees — citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993.
More:
Lindsey Graham gives as good as he gets - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com
Lindsey Graham takes on conservatives
By: Manu Raju
July 24, 2009 04:17 AM EST
When Sen. Lindsey Graham announced his support for Sonia Sotomayor this week, right-wing radio talk show host Mark Levin said it was a sign that Graham is unreliable ... as a thinker and a leader.
Wendy Long, counsel for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, called it proof that Graham still lacks courage, statesmanship and an understanding of the Constitution and rule of law.
May his antics get the attention they richly deserve.
The response from Graham: Enjoy life in the minority.
In an interview with POLITICO Thursday, the South Carolina Republican defended his decision to back Sotomayor by laying out a broad critique of conservative activists who push ideological purity and refuse to cooperate with a Democratic Congress and White House.
If we chase this attitude that you have to say no to every Democratic proposal, you cant help the president ever, you cant ever reach across the aisle, then I dont want to be part of the movement because its a dead-end movement, Graham said.
I have no desire to be up here in an irrelevant status. Im smart enough to know that this country doesnt have a problem with conservatives. It has a problem with blind ideology. And those who are ideological-driven to a fault are never going to be able to take this party back into relevancy.
While a handful of other GOP senators have said theyll back Sotomayor when her nomination comes to the floor, Graham is the first Republican on the Judiciary Committee to support her.
He may be the only one. Not all of the Republicans on the committee have announced their views, but the two who would seem mostly likely to defect Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), two veterans who have voted for every Supreme Court nominee theyve faced in the Senate have both expressed reservations about Sotomayor.
Hatch said that hes troubled by her nomination, and Grassley said that people take things into consideration now that they didnt used to before. He added: So obviously, there are other things to consider than just qualifications.
Graham said that Sotomayor is not the nominee he would have chosen.
But after questioning her extensively during her confirmation hearing asking about everything from her views on abortion to the charge that shes a bully on the bench he said Sotomayor deserves his support because a review of her 17-year record proved she was well-qualified, her confirmation would not upset the ideological balance on the court, and Obama is entitled to some latitude in making his pick because he won the election.
Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993.
More:
Lindsey Graham gives as good as he gets - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com
Graham is not a leader... he's a follower; always has been.
All the above explanation is, is a tepid endorsement of leftism...
What Graham and the Centrist (read: fascist) gaggle are simply not bright enough to understand is that being in the minority is a function of POOR LEADERSHIP...
The simple fact is that there has not been a CONSERVATIVE advocate in the US federal Executive since Ronald Reagan left office, or in the Federal Legislature since Gingrich left office, having let the Clinton machine roll over him.
Graham believes, which is not to say "thinks", as he's ill-equipped for such, is that being in the majority is somehow beneficial to anyone but those seeking mic-time... or face-time on Television. He wants to be POPULAR... and that's the bottom line.
He doesn't want to be a leader, because being a leader requires one to understand instinctively, the principles involved and to be able to unapologetically articulate those principles in the FACE OF AN OPPOSSING MAJORITY...
So screw his subversive ass...
Graham... GET THE HELL OUT OF THE GOP... We DON'T WANT YOU HERE... Take your yellow stripe to the left side and STAY THERE/ ya spineless little Deniis the Menace looking POS...
Lindsey Graham takes on conservatives
By: Manu Raju
July 24, 2009 04:17 AM EST
When Sen. Lindsey Graham announced his support for Sonia Sotomayor this week, right-wing radio talk show host Mark Levin said it was a sign that Graham is unreliable ... as a thinker and a leader.
Wendy Long, counsel for the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, called it proof that Graham still lacks courage, statesmanship and an understanding of the Constitution and rule of law.
May his antics get the attention they richly deserve.
The response from Graham: Enjoy life in the minority.
In an interview with POLITICO Thursday, the South Carolina Republican defended his decision to back Sotomayor by laying out a broad critique of conservative activists who push ideological purity and refuse to cooperate with a Democratic Congress and White House.
If we chase this attitude that you have to say no to every Democratic proposal, you cant help the president ever, you cant ever reach across the aisle, then I dont want to be part of the movement because its a dead-end movement, Graham said.
I have no desire to be up here in an irrelevant status. Im smart enough to know that this country doesnt have a problem with conservatives. It has a problem with blind ideology. And those who are ideological-driven to a fault are never going to be able to take this party back into relevancy.
While a handful of other GOP senators have said theyll back Sotomayor when her nomination comes to the floor, Graham is the first Republican on the Judiciary Committee to support her.
He may be the only one. Not all of the Republicans on the committee have announced their views, but the two who would seem mostly likely to defect Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), two veterans who have voted for every Supreme Court nominee theyve faced in the Senate have both expressed reservations about Sotomayor.
Hatch said that hes troubled by her nomination, and Grassley said that people take things into consideration now that they didnt used to before. He added: So obviously, there are other things to consider than just qualifications.
Graham said that Sotomayor is not the nominee he would have chosen.
But after questioning her extensively during her confirmation hearing asking about everything from her views on abortion to the charge that shes a bully on the bench he said Sotomayor deserves his support because a review of her 17-year record proved she was well-qualified, her confirmation would not upset the ideological balance on the court, and Obama is entitled to some latitude in making his pick because he won the election.
Most of all, he said, he wanted to return to the days where ideology was not part of the equation when choosing judicial nominees citing the 98-0 confirmation of Antonin Scalia in 1986 and the 96-3 confirmation of Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1993.
More:
Lindsey Graham gives as good as he gets - Manu Raju - POLITICO.com
Graham is not a leader... he's a follower; always has been.
All the above explanation is, is a tepid endorsement of leftism...
What Graham and the Centrist (read: fascist) gaggle are simply not bright enough to understand is that being in the minority is a function of POOR LEADERSHIP...
The simple fact is that there has not been a CONSERVATIVE advocate in the US federal Executive since Ronald Reagan left office, or in the Federal Legislature since Gingrich left office, having let the Clinton machine roll over him.
Graham believes, which is not to say "thinks", as he's ill-equipped for such, is that being in the majority is somehow beneficial to anyone but those seeking mic-time... or face-time on Television. He wants to be POPULAR... and that's the bottom line.
He doesn't want to be a leader, because being a leader requires one to understand instinctively, the principles involved and to be able to unapologetically articulate those principles in the FACE OF AN OPPOSSING MAJORITY...
So screw his subversive ass...
Graham... GET THE HELL OUT OF THE GOP... We DON'T WANT YOU HERE... Take your yellow stripe to the left side and STAY THERE/ ya spineless little Deniis the Menace looking POS...
John McCain is a Republican ... Just like how Barack Obama is a moderate Democrat. McCain isn't Conservative, Obama isn't Liberal.
John McCain is a Republican ... Just like how Barack Obama is a moderate Democrat. McCain isn't Conservative, Obama isn't Liberal.
ROFLMNAO...
Well there ya go kids... And what a brilliant, if unwitting, swirve into reality...
'John McCain is a Moderate Republican; just as Barack Obama is a Moderate Democrat...'
Now this is the thing about these idiots... "Liberal" is a subjective concept... it's a term of relevance; like "Fairness"... it means something different to each of us, based upon our individual perspective. To most people 'liberal' is a irrationally feminized, wishy-washy, mamby pamby, granola munching, birkenstock wearing, enviro-crank... so the term 'liberal' is thoroughly discredited; thus the political equivilent to being diagnosed with the HIV...
So it's fairly easy to see why the sub-intellects do NOT want to use that hijacked term... for those they hope to subject upon the body-politic. But as the left uses "Liberal," it's MEANINGLESS...
What we're talking about here is LEFTISM... and there is absolutely ZERO, LIBERATING about Leftism; the full scope of the Leftist ideology is VOID of so much as a single facet of any idea, which can in the BEST OF CIRCUMSTANCES, promote LIBERTY TO ANYONE, AT ANY LEVEL...
Lindsey Graham, John McCain and the BOY King... are all LEFTISTS... meaning that they all believe in the principle-less, false, unsustainable 'rights of the collective;' over the immutably principled, true, sustainable rights of the individual...
Now of course, that this buffoon doesn't 'feel' that they're liberal is simply a function of there being no objective means to identify anyone as a liberal... She also doesn't believe that Her Thighness or Der Schlickmiester are liberals... so don't sweat it.
It's an ever shifting goal post that can never be crossed...
"Leftist
How is Obama "radical"??
Websters Collegiate 2009 Definition of RADICAL said:rad·i·cal [ráddik'l]
adj
1. basic: relating to or affecting the basic nature or most important features of something
a radical difference between the two
2. pervasive: far-reaching, searching, or thoroughgoing
a radical reorganization of the company
3. favoring major changes: favoring or making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature
How is Obama "radical"??
Well let's see...
The BOY King 'feels' that a woman who willfully engages in sexual intercourse "...should not be PUNISHED WITH A BABY..."
He has stripped private Corporations of their means to pay their employees beased upon a mutually agreed upon contract; siezed control of large segments of the US Private markets, spent or otherwise obligated the US government to spend TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, which tend towards empoering the ideological left; he's further attempting to hijack the US Healthcare industry, through which he hopes to use that Federal obligation to manipulate the US Culture...
How much more do ya need?
Perhaps you'll define "Radical"
Here's how I define Radical:
Websters Collegiate 2009 Definition of RADICAL said:rad·i·cal [ráddik'l]
adj
1. basic: relating to or affecting the basic nature or most important features of something
a radical difference between the two
2. pervasive: far-reaching, searching, or thoroughgoing
a radical reorganization of the company
3. favoring major changes: favoring or making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature
Now those with sufficient intellectual means will notice how the examples I provided correlate with that well established definition.
What this imbecile wants to do, is to REDEFINE the term and to do so using facets of the issue which are wholly irrelevant...
But that's a Leftist for ya... It's deception and that's what leftism is ALL ABOUT!
Let the record reflect that the Leftists who have tried to respond to my argument; have unanimously opted to do so by overtly avoiding that argument; and instead trot out the usual fallacious red-herrings common to the sub-intellect...
LOL.. Leftists...
