Limbaugh opens show defending Akin

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Oct 20, 2008
43,044
6,883
1,830
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.
 
What a difference the last break made. Obviously the GOP cracked down on their shill, he has now come back after the break and wants Akin to step down so the GOP can win the Senate. He knows who pulls his strings!
 
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.

Liar, Limbaugh was objective, not acting like a crazed vampire like you and your ilk. Limbaugh even said "i'm just a guy on the radio, i can't tell this guy whether to stay in or drop out of the race" ......
 
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.

Rushes Biggest fan. Are you a paid sill for Limbaugh? The best advertisement is to have someone talk shit about him to get other to talk about him. Rush thanks you. The cheapest he's ever paid for an advertisement.
 
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.

You are a liar.
I have listened to the entire show, he has not said he wants Akin to stay. He has made it clear all morning that he expects Akin to do the right thing and make his decision based on what is best for the country.
 
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.

You idiots made the man rich...And yes he does credit the left for his success...

Here you are, listening, when we dont.
 
So did Levin. I don't think they are condoning what he said but why do Republicans always have to first apologize then resign but when a Dem does the same, they get a pass...a/k/a Biden who didn't take the time to apologize and has a boss who didn't distance himself from it.
 
Last edited:
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.

Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.

There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.
 
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.

Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.

There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.

Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.
 
No surprise there. He wants Akin to stay. Calls Akin a good guy and Democrats evil. Brings up discredited rape accusations against keynote speaker Clinton.

Why not post his remark, instead of just slandering him?

slandering rush?

heh... that's funny.

I am no fan of Rush, he come off too arrogant to me, but the OP is making it like he is defending what Akins said, when in reality we don't know what he said, because the OP only posted his opinion (which is highly biased) of what Rush "supposedly" did!
 
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.

Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.

There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.

Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.

The replies here speak for themselves. Rush is more successful so they attack him even though he is no different than their media heroes.

Once again success should be punished because of envy.
 
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.

Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.

There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.

Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.

MSNBC rocks.

Rush scares white men as they get in their trucks at lunchtime.
 
Rush is no worse than Ed Schultz, Lawrence O'Donnell or Rachel Maddow. All rant and rave and fire up the base.

Rush is just better at it so let's mock and punish him because he is more successful at what he does.

There isn't one criticism of him that doesn't apply to the others.

Don't forget the rest of the MSDNC lineup. Sharpton, Matthews etc.

The replies here speak for themselves. Rush is more successful so they attack him even though he is no different than their media heroes.

Once again success should be punished because of envy.

Well let's be honest... we do envy the wealthy.

-We envy the ability of the wealthy to convince 50% of the population to vote against their own interests.

-We envy the ability of the wealthy to run the country into the ground, blame the government...then ask the same government for help.

-We envy the ability of the wealthy to demand the government provide corporate protections, subsidies and welfare, while simultaneously denouncing "dependency" on Government.

-We envy the ability of the wealthy to use their wealth to buy US public policy and law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top