Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I had Carbonite for a while.Palin, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin, Limbaugh
Can I have a show of hands from conservative republicans that pay these people any mind?
The liberal democrats are so quick to start threads that quote these fringe lunatics like they're representative of the majority of republicans.
Hell yea! They speak for me because I don't have a mind of my own!!!
Okay, I don't listen to them, although sometimes I do hear a few minutes of Limbaugh on the radio. And I'm glad I did. There was an advertisement for Carbonite so I got it and it's been great.
I can cede to the latterPalin, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin, Limbaugh
Can I have a show of hands from conservative republicans that pay these people any mind?
The liberal democrats are so quick to start threads that quote these fringe lunatics like they're representative of the majority of republicans.
Naturally you leave out the most sensible option: "These people espouse views similar to my own and fight for our mutually-held values and principles."
And, of course, there's the ever-popular: "Anyone that enrages liberals that much must be doing something right."
I believe it because the liberal message is a message of socialism and the message downright sucks, period.Sam Greenfield was my favorite. It was funny when a conservative got through because he'd call them a liar (for lying to the screener) and he's not having a liar on his show as if that were the issue. But they didn't get through the screener unless they lied. He got cancelled from the station I listened to him.
Randi Rhodes. What a nut job, but I listened to her every chance I got.
Air America. Besides Randi Rhodes I listened to Air America when I was in consulting and in a city that got them.
But generally, the reason liberals aren't as entertaining on the radio is they won't allow any conflicting viewpoint on their show. With Rush, Hannity and the other major Republicans if you're liberal you're moved to the front of the line. They seldom agree with you, but you are heard. But with liberal radio hosts conflicting views don't get on. I did amazingly listen to one liberal who let Conservatives on for a while in New York. But he sent bat shit and got cancelled after an anti-semitic rant.
You believe the reason that liberals fail, flat out fail, at radio is because they don't allow conflicting points of view!? I personally called Randi Rhodes show several times and was allowed on the air. I listen to Rush all the time and can not remember the last time he allowed a liberal on the air.
Yes, that is it!!!!! If only Air America had your brilliant insight they would still be on the air!!!! LOLYeah right.
Liberal talk radio fails because of its message.
You go ahead and believe that
Palin, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin, Limbaugh
Can I have a show of hands from conservative republicans that pay these people any mind?
The liberal democrats are so quick to start threads that quote these fringe lunatics like they're representative of the majority of republicans.
And that’s the problem: the failure of the Old Guard GOP to denounce the demagoguery of these and other Culture Warriors. To indeed take the ‘GOP’ back from radical rightists and social conservatives.
Consequently the individuals noted in the OP are representative of a significant number of republicans, the TPM in particular.
Otherwise this is a problem for republicans to address, and complaining about liberals isn’t going to help.
Libs have jobs so for the most part they can't listen to the pathological liar.HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
to pretend republican voters dont like these people is just insane
I love those people because they drive YOU people insane!!! You left wing retards get so insanely irritated by them, I love every second of it. In fact, I'd bet 40% of their audience are retarded left wingers who are like crack addicts....they keep watching just so they can be offended.
Liberals are, in fact, addicted to being offended. Addicted to victimhood. That explains left wingers.
Palin, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Malkin, Limbaugh
Can I have a show of hands from conservative republicans that pay these people any mind?
The liberal democrats are so quick to start threads that quote these fringe lunatics like they're representative of the majority of republicans.
I'm a libertarian, which means if you want fiscal conservative I'm there and if you want fiscal social I'm not. But my feedback:
Palin: Marginal politician but doesn't deserve the abuse she gets from the left because they are raging sexists who do not give a mere woman the right to disagree with them
Beck: He's pretty libertarian so I generally agree with him, but he's so fucking preachy that I can't take him in more then small quantities
Hannity: Heck of a nice guy, but he gets too upset when he talks to liberals and he's a bit of a pom pom Republican.
Coulter: She is a great political writer. No one can take apart liberal arguments like she can. When she speaks I appreciate the irony she makes liberals furious by doing to them what they do to everyone else, but I want to be bigger then them not like them.
Malkin: I can't take her seriously after she came out in support of keeping Japanese in internment camps in WWII
Rush: He's the best radio host by a country mile. I don't agree with him the most, he's the most entertaining. That's why he has such a large liberal audience as well. As a libertarian I tend to agree with him on fiscal issues and disagree on social. He's a great interviewer of liberals, has a thick skin and sets traps for them. Like when he said oil is natural and on the air he was saying that to send liberals in a tizzy and even though he told them what he was doing they obediently went right into a tizzy.
How gullible do you have to be to believe that bullshit? His screener is there to get rid of any Lib callers that can nail him in his lies! I have gotten through twice and both times the screener blocked me out!They are not marketed at me.
Years ago I used to listen to Rush to hear what republicans would say when they thought no one but republicans were listening.
Now I get it straight from the republican voter.
The people on here
No one ever thought that only Republicans listen to Rush and they still don't. He dominates talk radio and does it across ideologies. If you're liberal, you move to the front of the line, he says what he's doing when he plays the liberal media. Girlfriend, you're not making any sense
Actually the joke is on YOU!They are not marketed at me.
Years ago I used to listen to Rush to hear what republicans would say when they thought no one but republicans were listening.
Now I get it straight from the republican voter.
The people on here
You REALLY don't understand Rush Limbaugh then. He is 50% good commentary, 50% comedy. I'm a big supporter of his, but I KNOW what he is. He's 50% political comedian, but you left wing retards don't grasp that.
His show is brilliant, and we're all in on the joke, because what you said is completely untrue. Limbaugh isn't "what republicans say when they thought no one but republicans were listening". When Rush is one, he and all of us KNOW a lot of liberals are listening. I'd say 30-40% of his audience tend to lean left. They are obsessed with him. And he plays you all like fools. Half of what he says is to piss of the libs we all know are listening. Listening secretly, but listening. And we all laugh at picturing you morons getting uber offended. And that image is hilarious, and thats what makes Rush's show so much fun.
I shouldn't have told you though. Thats half the fun. The extremely retarded libs are the ones who listen to Rush, and DON'T know that. They take it as gosspil of what right wingers think. Jokes on you idiots!
Darn tootin'.
Anyone who has head the show knows what's up. Hell 90% of the time he will announce his "Media Soundbite of the Day" straight up. Says something that out of context will make libs flip out, the lame-stream media replays it out of context and then libs flip out. Round and round it goes.
And not for nothing but everyone on the list in the OP is a best selling author, just ask the New York Times, lol. Many of them multiple times over. They are not fringe kooks. They speak for millions in fun and kooky ways.
As a Libertarian I only agree with half of what anyone says and that includes fellow Libertarians.
I vote for Republicans because I want to take the slow moving coal powered choo-choo off the economic cliff of doom. Democrats want to take the high speed bullet train off the economic cliff of doom.
So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
January 16, 2009So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
Gospel is the world of Gd.
Limbaugh is not Gd. He is a college dropout who is on the radio three hours a day and his main objective is to get people to listen to the ads he sells.
I like him, I find him lots of fun, but I am not a parrot.
I think most people who listen to right wing radio fundamentally agree with Neal Boortz's take on the whole industry. They are there for entertainment, and you never take anything you hear from any source as the truth unless you can somehow verify it by a different means.
Given my current circumstances, I can't listen to Limbuagh right now. I would if I could, but even if I did I would take everything he says with quite a lot of salt.
Which is the way you should treat everyone who writes for a blog, for the radio, for TV, for a newspaper. You should have multiple sources, and the only truth belongs to Gd.
I'm a rightwinger. I can't cite anything Limbaugh said that wasn't gospel (or even was gospel). I don't listen to him, so that would be difficult for me to do.So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
It's too bad you don't because to CON$ he is the foremost expert on scientific matters. They will swallow any shit he feeds them on the global warming "hoax." Unfortunately DittoTards can't tell just how moronic his scientific knowledge is even when he contradicts himself in the same stupid rant.I can't quote the fat-assed blow-hard because I don't listen to his streaming pile of shit.So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
What case?
This is what I love about DittoTards. When I first came to this board they attacked me for NOT listening to him and told me I had to listen to him for at least 6 straight weeks, and now they attack me FOR listening to him.I'm a rightwinger. I can't cite anything Limbaugh said that wasn't gospel (or even was gospel). I don't listen to him, so that would be difficult for me to do.So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
But, Edthecynic has a man crush on the guy, so I'm sure he can answer you.
If one assumes that a 'dittotard' is one who listens to Limbaugh, then what part of "I don't listen to him" has you so very confused?This is what I love about DittoTards. When I first came to this board they attacked me for NOT listening to him and told me I had to listen to him for at least 6 straight weeks, and now they attack me FOR listening to him.I'm a rightwinger. I can't cite anything Limbaugh said that wasn't gospel (or even was gospel). I don't listen to him, so that would be difficult for me to do.So not one rightwinger here can cite anything they heard Limbaugh say that wasn't the Gospel?
Not one??
case closed...
But, Edthecynic has a man crush on the guy, so I'm sure he can answer you.
