- Mar 27, 2012
- 15,286
- 6,334
- 390
Anybody else surprised? I'm not. Even 40 years ago this wouldn't have surprised me. At all.
You need to understand the mentality of dims, people. They don't think like normal human beings. They just don't.
Of course, if I thought EVERYBODY was like dimocraps, if ALL humans were like them (which, dimocrraps don't really know any other kind of human than themselves) then I might favor monkeys over people, too.
Nah...... No 'might' about it
Libs Argue Monkeys Are Legal Persons But The Unborn Aren t Downtrend
Liberals want us to believe that the unborn are not human beings. They’re not worthy of human rights and therefore can be aborted.
Their argument is that they’re only “potentially” human beings. And you can’t grant the same rights to a “potential” person as you can to a “real” person.
Then, pray tell, how one earth can the same liberals who fight for the right to abortions proclaim that chimpanzees are humans? Because that’s what they doing, and the courts might be buying it.
The New York Times is reporting that a judge in Manhattan has ordered a hearing to decide whether or not chimpanzees can be considered “legal persons” in the eyes of the law.
The chimps are at Stony Brook University in Long Island and are part of a collection of research animals used by scientists.
Judge Barbara Jaffe’s decision has been hailed by liberals as a victory for animal rights.
Critics – of course – are shocked that the courts would even consider the question of whether or not a chimpanzee has “human rights.”
Meanwhile, every day, hundreds of unborn children are killed. And that’s okay because they’re not as human as chimpanzees, right?
Edge:
I think it's dims that should be in cages. That way we could be protected from them when they inevitably hurl their own shit at us
You need to understand the mentality of dims, people. They don't think like normal human beings. They just don't.
Of course, if I thought EVERYBODY was like dimocraps, if ALL humans were like them (which, dimocrraps don't really know any other kind of human than themselves) then I might favor monkeys over people, too.
Nah...... No 'might' about it
Libs Argue Monkeys Are Legal Persons But The Unborn Aren t Downtrend
Liberals want us to believe that the unborn are not human beings. They’re not worthy of human rights and therefore can be aborted.
Their argument is that they’re only “potentially” human beings. And you can’t grant the same rights to a “potential” person as you can to a “real” person.
Then, pray tell, how one earth can the same liberals who fight for the right to abortions proclaim that chimpanzees are humans? Because that’s what they doing, and the courts might be buying it.
The New York Times is reporting that a judge in Manhattan has ordered a hearing to decide whether or not chimpanzees can be considered “legal persons” in the eyes of the law.
The chimps are at Stony Brook University in Long Island and are part of a collection of research animals used by scientists.
Judge Barbara Jaffe’s decision has been hailed by liberals as a victory for animal rights.
Critics – of course – are shocked that the courts would even consider the question of whether or not a chimpanzee has “human rights.”
Meanwhile, every day, hundreds of unborn children are killed. And that’s okay because they’re not as human as chimpanzees, right?
Edge:
I think it's dims that should be in cages. That way we could be protected from them when they inevitably hurl their own shit at us
