Libertarians and Non-Leftists

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Annie, Jan 17, 2004.

  1. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    What about the second ammendment? Of the weirdest places to find this, the LA Times?



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion...1,3263293.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions
    COMMENTARY
    a d v e r t i s e m e n t




    Skeptic Gives Guns a Shot
    The firearms issue looks a little different from behind the trigger.
    By Diana Wagman

    January 15, 2004

    Guns are bad. All my life, it's been that simple. At my son's preschool, if a child pointed a banana and said "bang," he was admonished to "use the banana in a happier way." As far as I was concerned, the 2nd Amendment gave us the right to protect ourselves against invading armies, not the right to buy a gun and keep it under our beds.

    So what would make someone like me change my mind? I met this gun enthusiast. As research for my new novel, I asked him many questions, all the while voicing my disgust. My character might use a gun, but I never would. "Come to the range," the gun guy said. "I'll teach you to shoot."

    I expected a dungeon full of men missing teeth and wearing T-shirts decorated with Confederate flags. Instead, I found a sunny, wood-paneled lobby and guys who looked like lawyers on their lunch break.

    The man behind the counter was as pleasant as a grandfather from Central Casting. "What would it take for me to buy a gun?" I asked him. He explained the California laws, some of the most stringent in the country. I would have to wait 10 days — the "cooling off" period. There would be federal and local background checks. I'd have to take a safety class. I'd have to buy a childproof lock. I couldn't purchase an assault weapon. I couldn't buy more than one handgun per month. Of course, he said, if I didn't want to wait, I could drive 10 minutes and buy an Uzi illegally out of someone's car.

    When my guide arrived, he gave me a choice of handguns. I went with the .357 magnum — I recognized the name — and a traditional target with a red bull's-eye. I couldn't imagine shooting at one shaped like a man.

    First lesson, respect your firearm. I got a little talk about how powerful it was. I learned how to hold it. To load it. And finally to fire it. It was terrifying. The gun was so heavy, I couldn't keep it steady. It took both index fingers to pull the trigger, and then there was a flash of flame, a loud crack, a substantial kick. It was much harder than it looked in the movies. I occasionally hit the target, but I also managed to obliterate the metal hanger that held it.

    I have to admit: I loved it. I had a fantastic time. The power of that gun for me, a 5-foot, 3-inch woman, was immediately, shockingly seductive. The thrill when I hit the bull's-eye (once) was as great as making a perfect tennis shot. I felt like I was playing a careful game of darts in a small, alcohol-free bar.

    Later, I was surprised to discover that some of my closest friends owned guns. People I never would have suspected confessed that their guns made them feel protected. Still, most of my friends thought handguns should be outlawed, completely, in every circumstance.

    I no longer was so sure. I did some research — there are countless testimonials about guns saving someone's life. I looked into shooting as a sport. I spoke to a woman who had found a wounded deer and shot it, ending its agony. I changed my mind: Guns aren't bad.

    Which leaves gun violence. At least in California, we don't need more laws — we just need to enforce the ones we have. What else?

    The answer has to be education: teaching people to deal with anger, to solve problems, offering them brighter futures, but also Gun 101. Maybe if teenagers were given computer-generated pictures of their own bodies, post-gunshot wounds, it would help them understand the enormity of firing a weapon. Maybe if everyone spent an afternoon at the shooting range, forced to follow the rules, they would respect the power of a gun.

    I confess, I don't know exactly how to solve the problem, but at least now I know I don't know. Firing guns as a sport is great fun. Having a gun because it makes you feel safer seems understandable. Changing the way people behave? If you thought gun control was a distant dream … it could take centuries.

    Meanwhile, my 15-year-old has asked me to take him shooting. And I've agreed.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Novelist and screenwriter Diana Wagman is the author of "Bump" (Carroll & Graf, 2003) and "Skin Deep" (University of Mississippi Press reprint, 2001).




    If you want other stories on this topic, search the Archives at latimes.com/archives.
    Click here for article licensing and reprint options


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Copyright 2004 Los Angeles Times
     
  2. jones
    Online

    jones Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Good post, good article.
    The guy posting did mention we have them to protect us from invading armys. BUT, thats what our armed forces are for.
    The most important reason we were givin the right to bare arms is to protect us against our own goverment when its necessary.
     
  3. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    against our government and those that mean us harm. I for one would never have a gun in my home. I know myself and my family members, we are too firey. Yet, I don't expect that the 'bad guys' know that I do not have a firearm, my neighbor might. I don't know and neither do the bad guys.

    I'm all for a concealed carry law. Let the bad guys guess.
     

Share This Page