Liberals the party of the super rich

[miami_thomas]

Makes since when you really think about it. The super rich can absorb the higher taxes and have the resources to deal with more regulations and laws. They have the people in place to build in the loop holes in the tax code and the resources to find them when they need more money. It is no wonder the super wealthy support liberals 3 to 1 over conservatives. Conservatives are for economic freedom which supports small business and the middle class that hope to someday make it rich. Small business is the competition to the super rich and with higher taxes and more rules and regulations can put them out of business. No wonder the super rich support the liberals it works well in their favor.

As far as the liberals go, it works for their goals as well. If you do away with the many small businesses, it is easy to handle the few super rich. After all, it is power that is most desired here. Those of you out there that truly believe that the liberal party is the party for the little people really are being played. At the end of the day it is your party that is allies with the very corporations that you blame the conservatives of being in bed with. Now it makes perfect since why unemployment goes up every time a true left liberal gets into office because small business suffer and they are responsible for 80% of the jobs in America.

Liberal politicians, the super rich, and strange allies

For those that want to argue that the unemployment is getting better is plain wrong. The only thing getting better is the shrinking of the labor force. If Obama gets re-elected, be ready for a truly new America. One that no longer includes the small business and has a labor force that accounts for less than half of America. During Obama’s entire presidency the labor force participation rate has continually dropped. I showed all the way back through Bush’s presidency to show rates. The history goes all the way back to 1994 and there was never a participation rate below 66 percent until Obama.

Participation rate

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2001 2001 2001 2001 2001 2002
66.9 66.9 66.9 66.9 66.8 66.4

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 2003
66.4 66.8 66.6 66.4 66.4 66.1

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2003 2003 2003 2003 2003 2004
66.1 66.3 66.1 66.2 66.0 66.1

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2004 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005
66.1 65.9 66.0 66.1 66.0 65.8

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2005 2005 2005 2005 2005 2006
65.8 66.2 66.1 66.1 66.0 66.0

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2007
66.0 66.2 66.2 66.3 66.4 66.3

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2008
66.3 66.0 65.9 66.0 66.0 66.1

Jan. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan.
2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 2009
66.1 66.0 66.0 65.8 65.7 65.5

Jan. Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2010
65.7 65.2 65.1 64.9 64.6 64.7

Jan. Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2011
64.8 64.7 64.5 64.5 64.3 64.2

Jan. Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan
2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2012
64.2 64.2 64.2 64.0 64.0 63.7

Employment Situation Archived News Releases

 

[RDD_1210]

None of what you said makes since

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Do the Koch brothers know?

LOL

 

[amrchaos]

In 2007, the rate dropped to 65.9

Also occurances in 2004 where the rate dropped below 66 as well

 

[Dragon]

There is no political party in the United States called "Liberals." The two major parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. If you are going to speak of parties, you need to speak of ones that actually exist.

 

[Decepticon]

Perhaps when you post evidence that actually SUPPORTS any of your contentions, you'll be taken seriously.

Until then, cue the clown music.

 

[miami_thomas]

In 2007, the rate dropped to 65.9

Also occurances in 2004 where the rate dropped below 66 as well

Welcome to the worlds weakest argument. You mean to tell me you actually posted to point out that two times it fell below 66 percent before but it has been pretty much under 66 percent Obama's entire presidency. Plus it rebounded above 66 percent both times.

 

[miami_thomas]

Do the Koch brothers know?

LOL

No but GE knows. George Soros seems to know as well. The list can go on and on and on. Does it say none of the 1 percent supported the conservatives? No it says 3 to 1 supported liberals.

 

[miami_thomas]

None of what you said makes since

Then read it again but this time slower.

 

[miami_thomas]

There is no political party in the United States called "Liberals." The two major parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. If you are going to speak of parties, you need to speak of ones that actually exist.

Ok. Democatic party is the party of the super rich.

 

[Decepticon]

Says the guy who posts an OPINION piece from some right wing webrag.

I guess it never occurred to you that the rich are voting with their money, RIGHT NOW, because they think Obama is going to WIN. It's not that Obama will do them any quid pro quo favors, it's just that there's no sense in giving money to the LOSING SIDE to buy influence, is there?

 

[jillian]

In 2007, the rate dropped to 65.9

Also occurances in 2004 where the rate dropped below 66 as well

Welcome to the worlds weakest argument. You mean to tell me you actually posted to point out that two times it fell below 66 percent before but it has been pretty much under 66 percent Obama's entire presidency. Plus it rebounded above 66 percent both times.

it's always funny to watch someone who's a nutter make irrational arguments that are false on their face and then tell others that they are making "weak argument"

 

[miami_thomas]

Perhaps when you post evidence that actually SUPPORTS any of your contentions, you'll be taken seriously.

Until then, cue the clown music.

"The Top 20 Wealthiest Americans list is actually dominated by Democrats. Bill Gates and Larry Ellison are the next two richest people in America. And they are both Democrats. Christy Walton, the heir of the Wal-Mart fortune, comes in at #4 and is an independent. She frequently donates to both Republican and Democratic politicians. The #5 and #6 spots in America are owned by the Kochs, making them the richest conservatives. Overall, the Top 20 is 60% Democrat and 40% Republican. When you take out duplications from the same family, this number jumps up to 75% [Democrat]!"

Are Wealthy Americans Always Conservative? | Addicting Info

 

[miami_thomas]

Says the guy who posts an OPINION piece from some right wing webrag.

I guess it never occurred to you that the rich are voting with their money, RIGHT NOW, because they think Obama is going to WIN. It's not that Obama will do them any quid pro quo favors, it's just that there's no sense in giving money to the LOSING SIDE to buy influence, is there?

Sure and in 2008 all his money came from the poor.

 

[Dragon]

There is no political party in the United States called "Liberals." The two major parties are the Democratic Party and the Republican Party. If you are going to speak of parties, you need to speak of ones that actually exist.

Ok. Democatic party is the party of the super rich.

Still a problem, because "the party" implies there's only one. You're getting a little better, though.

 

[miami_thomas]

In 2007, the rate dropped to 65.9

Also occurances in 2004 where the rate dropped below 66 as well

Welcome to the worlds weakest argument. You mean to tell me you actually posted to point out that two times it fell below 66 percent before but it has been pretty much under 66 percent Obama's entire presidency. Plus it rebounded above 66 percent both times.

it's always funny to watch someone who's a nutter make irrational arguments that are false on their face and then tell others that they are making "weak argument"

What is false? More of the super rich support democrats: True.
The labor force participation rate has decreased every year under Obama: True.

Sure I made the statement that the rate never dropped below 66 percent since 1994 knowing it did in the numbers I put up two times in 8 years under Bush. I knew someone would say something. I was waiting for it to see some idiot try to argue that point knowing the data shows it being under 66% since 2008. Plus the fact that both times it was 65.9 percent. Come on it is a weak argument.

 

[Decepticon]

Not to BLOW A GIANT HOLE in the OP's primary point, but I'm going to BLOW A GIANT HOLE in the OP's primary point.

Vote by Income


Dem Repub Indy
Under $30,000 (17%) 57% 40% 3%
$30-50,000 (19%) 51% 46% 3%
$50-75,000 (21%) 45% 51% 4%
$75-100,000 (15%) 42% 56% 2%
$100-200,000 (19%) 43% 56% 1%
$200,000 or More (8%) 34% 64% 2%

Senate, House, Governor Races - Election Center 2010 - Elections & Politics from CNN.com


Geez...do a TWO MINUTE GOOGLE SEARCH before you come on here and WASTE EVERYONE'S TIME WITH YOUR CLUSMY LIES/IGNORANCE.

 

[miami_thomas]

Not to BLOW A GIANT HOLE in the OP's primary point, but I'm going to BLOW A GIANT HOLE in the OP's primary point.

Vote by Income


Dem Repub Indy
Under $30,000 (17%) 57% 40% 3%
$30-50,000 (19%) 51% 46% 3%
$50-75,000 (21%) 45% 51% 4%
$75-100,000 (15%) 42% 56% 2%
$100-200,000 (19%) 43% 56% 1%
$200,000 or More (8%) 34% 64% 2%

Senate, House, Governor Races - Election Center 2010 - Elections & Politics from CNN.com


Geez...do a TWO MINUTE GOOGLE SEARCH before you come on here and WASTE EVERYONE'S TIME WITH YOUR CLUSMY LIES/IGNORANCE.

Not to blow a hole in your argument

1: That is an exit poll 17,504 individuals.
2: They draw the line at 200,000 and that is the top 8%.

The upper one percent make more than 343,927. But way to go.

 

[RDD_1210]

None of what you said makes since

Then read it again but this time slower.

Sense I just read it it again, it still doesn't make since.

 

[miami_thomas]

None of what you said makes since

Then read it again but this time slower.

Sense I just read it it again, it still doesn't make since.

Super rich support liberals.

Liberals increase taxes on those making over 200,000.
Small business and entrepreneurs making over 200,000 have to pay higher taxes
making it difficult for the small business to stay in business.

Liberals put in heavy new rules and regulations.
It is expensive for small business and entrepreneurs to implement the new rules and
regulations and stay in business.

Liberal put in Unionized labor which cost more for small business owners and entrepreneurs to stay in business.

Super rich benefit by less competition and therefore become more wealthy.