Last edited:
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liberals responsible for all the violence all around the world:
- Thread starter EdwardBaiamonte
- Start date
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,343
- 27,897
- 2,180
Who knows! When the screaming goes out to ban guns who knows! You all should shut up about ban if you don’t want that tagHitler went about it a little differently don't you think? He was a nationalist. Surely you must understand that, right?World fking power. Hitler tried it, the rest figured out what to do. They learned from him. It’s why leftist are nazis, they want all guns!How does destroying civilization serve the interests of the globalists?Globalists are capitalists. I'm unsure what is criminal about them.why are globalists criminals??? whats a globalist and new world order???
Globalists do not respect sovereignty and flood civilized countries with third world primitives who set about to destroy the very notion of civilization, itself.
Sounds pretty criminal to me. In fact, I would use a much stronger word, myself.
Destroy from within.
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,556
- 70,505
- 2,645
- Banned
- #43
Trump is doing that very thing.If enough people were conservative govt would have little power and no one would want to control it.
When is the last time conservatives meaningfully shrunk the size/power of the government? They are just as guilty as the left. Though even if what you said wasn't nonsense, do you really believe people wouldn't fight for control of a government that controls an extremely powerful military? Use your brain.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,343
- 27,897
- 2,180
Germany, France, Great Britain Sweden should I go on?You have yet to prove any of your allegations.Which is not unusual for someone that has nothing but an opinion...Exactly, all the fighting is to control govt and then use govt's power to force everyone to do as the victors want. If enough people were conservative govt would have little power and no one would want to control it. Everyone could live in a peaceful Jeffersonian, Aristotelian, libertarian world with little to no central govt violence. Make sense?
Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Cheap labor is the short term goal.How does destroying civilization serve the interests of the globalists?Globalists are capitalists. I'm unsure what is criminal about them.why are globalists criminals??? whats a globalist and new world order???It's not so much "liberals" as such responsible for the violence worldwide
as much as "Globlalists" and "New World Order" criminals.
Globalists do not respect sovereignty and flood civilized countries with third world primitives who set about to destroy the very notion of civilization, itself.
Sounds pretty criminal to me. In fact, I would use a much stronger word, myself.
Multiculturalist indoctrination to create a compliant host community is the method.
The resulting destruction of western liberalism is simply the byproduct.
Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 24,318
- 14,247
- 1,415
how about him he does several things????How about starting with George Soros.
Really!? I'm sure you based that thought on doing something that resembles research.
Tehon
Gold Member
- Jun 19, 2015
- 8,938
- 1,239
- 275
It strikes me as odd that conservative hero Ronald Reagan openly discussed a desire for an open border with Mexico for that very purpose. Yet the problem is being portrayed as uniquely liberal.Cheap labor is the short term goal.How does destroying civilization serve the interests of the globalists?Globalists are capitalists. I'm unsure what is criminal about them.why are globalists criminals??? whats a globalist and new world order???It's not so much "liberals" as such responsible for the violence worldwide
as much as "Globlalists" and "New World Order" criminals.
Globalists do not respect sovereignty and flood civilized countries with third world primitives who set about to destroy the very notion of civilization, itself.
Sounds pretty criminal to me. In fact, I would use a much stronger word, myself.
Multiculturalist indoctrination to create a compliant host community is the method.
The resulting destruction of western liberalism is simply the byproduct.
It should not come as a surprise to anyone that capitalism would transform the world in this way. It has been understood for a very long time that this would be the eventual outcome.
The left at one time were chastised by the right for fighting against it. That was a time before Clinton drug the country to the right with his third way politics.
Your assumptions are that they are liberal in the first place...In real life assumptions don't make turds turn into gold nuggets...Germany, France, Great Britain Sweden should I go on?You have yet to prove any of your allegations.Which is not unusual for someone that has nothing but an opinion...Exactly, all the fighting is to control govt and then use govt's power to force everyone to do as the victors want. If enough people were conservative govt would have little power and no one would want to control it. Everyone could live in a peaceful Jeffersonian, Aristotelian, libertarian world with little to no central govt violence. Make sense?
It's rhetoric they have learned from their puppet masters...They are not educated free thinking people they are merely magpies...It strikes me as odd that conservative hero Ronald Reagan openly discussed a desire for an open border with Mexico for that very purpose. Yet the problem is being portrayed as uniquely liberal.Cheap labor is the short term goal.How does destroying civilization serve the interests of the globalists?Globalists are capitalists. I'm unsure what is criminal about them.why are globalists criminals??? whats a globalist and new world order???
Globalists do not respect sovereignty and flood civilized countries with third world primitives who set about to destroy the very notion of civilization, itself.
Sounds pretty criminal to me. In fact, I would use a much stronger word, myself.
Multiculturalist indoctrination to create a compliant host community is the method.
The resulting destruction of western liberalism is simply the byproduct.
It should not come as a surprise to anyone that capitalism would transform the world in this way. It has been understood for a very long time that this would be the eventual outcome.
The left at one time were chastised by the right for fighting against it. That was a time before Clinton drug the country to the right with his third way politics.
You know the most ironic thing about it is,,,,,,,,These big corporations that run these operations through our govt. and get our own govt. to look the other way are doing it to weaken labor and earn more profits.....These big corporations are the ones subverting the so called western liberalism, not liberals...Greed has no nationalism, no patriotism..They laugh watching the citizens getting upset over what our overlords mentions against a class, political organization, a political philosophy or even who gets a tax break and who doesn't.......Idiots can't see what the top is doing because of their smokescreens...Cheap labor is the short term goal.How does destroying civilization serve the interests of the globalists?Globalists are capitalists. I'm unsure what is criminal about them.why are globalists criminals??? whats a globalist and new world order???It's not so much "liberals" as such responsible for the violence worldwide
as much as "Globlalists" and "New World Order" criminals.
Globalists do not respect sovereignty and flood civilized countries with third world primitives who set about to destroy the very notion of civilization, itself.
Sounds pretty criminal to me. In fact, I would use a much stronger word, myself.
Multiculturalist indoctrination to create a compliant host community is the method.
The resulting destruction of western liberalism is simply the byproduct.
1797...Is this a joke?obviously if they did not shrink govt they were not conservatives. do you understand?
Conservatives shrink government?
When, exactly?
.
EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
- Thread starter
- #52
sure, when liberals centralize power in their hands those without power must fight for their rights. This is why founders gave us freedom from central power. Make sense now?1797...Is this a joke?obviously if they did not shrink govt they were not conservatives. do you understand?
Conservatives shrink government?
When, exactly?
.
No because the Founders were liberals..sure, when liberals centralize power in their hands those without power must fight for their rights. This is why founders gave us freedom from central power. Make sense now?1797...Is this a joke?obviously if they did not shrink govt they were not conservatives. do you understand?
Conservatives shrink government?
When, exactly?
.
EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
- Thread starter
- #54
No because the Founders were liberals..
if liberals means for tiny tiny govt you are correct
It's was tiny because it had no money, the US govt. was poh until the discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill...But then came the war between the states and well the GOP manged to take away states rights and impose a subjugative regime to make sure America was American...No because the Founders were liberals..
if liberals means for tiny tiny govt you are correct
EdwardBaiamonte
Platinum Member
- Nov 23, 2011
- 34,612
- 2,153
- 1,100
- Thread starter
- #56
It's was tiny because it had no money, the US govt. was poh..
yes very poor because Constiutution limited its power and money as matter of ultra conservative philosophy.
- Nov 28, 2011
- 42,749
- 15,963
- 2,250
. You do good until you start your blame game, so it's teet for tat around here I guess.It's was tiny because it had no money, the US govt. was poh until the discovery of gold at Sutter's Mill...But then came the war between the states and well the GOP manged to take away states rights and impose a subjugative regime to make sure America was American...No because the Founders were liberals..
if liberals means for tiny tiny govt you are correct
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,991
- 47,199
- 2,180
I thought yoy claimwd to be a conservative, Fakey.Yeah, he is posting all over today. He thinking cons are small government and for individual freedom.
Yeah, I know: funny.
View attachment 180169
Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app
Exactly, all the fighting is to control govt and then use govt's power to force everyone to do as the victors want. If enough people were conservative govt would have little power and no one would want to control it. Everyone could live in a peaceful Jeffersonian, Aristotelian, libertarian world with little to no central govt violence. Make sense?
Another Tribalist "liberal ba-aaad" thread.
Yawn.
Boring.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 143
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 219
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 249
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 22
- Views
- 46
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8039
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-