Liberal logic

[Mr.Nick]

Uhh, no,they really are your words. See, you wrote them in this post right here:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/203641-liberal-logic-2.html#post4675159
you fucking moron.





??? OK ??? Have you READ any of my posts? The issue I have is with your claim that "most of the spending under Bush was under a progressive super majority." - What does your statement that " presidents DONT SPEND MONEY and Congress does you fucking ape" have to do with that?

Once again your fried brain made shit up.

All I want is for you to provide evidence for your claim that:

"most of the spending under Bush was under a progressive super majority."

- or -


admit your claim to be in error.


Until you can do one of those things, don't talk to me. I'm sick of your shit. You go around making baseless claims and when you are held to account for them, you try to change the subject like a whiny little bitch.

What that presidents don't spend money???

That should be common knowledge!!!!!!!!!!

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Once again your fried brain made shit up.

All I want is for you to provide evidence for your claim that:

"most of the spending under Bush was under a progressive super majority."

- or -


admit your claim to be in error.


Until you can do one of those things, don't talk to me. I'm sick of your shit. You go around making baseless claims and when you are held to account for them, you try to change the subject like a whiny little bitch.

What that presidents don't spend money???

That should be common knowledge!!!!!!!!!!

NO - THIS CLAIM , MORON

"most of the spending under Bush was under a progressive super majority."