Liberal Left Is Insinuating Sarah Palin Wants Wikileaks Founder Assassinated!!!!

[USArmyRetired]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

 

[DaGoose]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

 

[USArmyRetired]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Well they gotta tell ya something i guess. This is an absolute disaster. How could this happen? Now they're just deflecting. How could so many leaks be allowed to happen? The MSM should start asking that question a lot more. And so should the Liberal Left. It's not gonna be enough to blame DA BOOOOOSH and Palin on this one.

 

[DaGoose]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

Ohhhh.....she's "chesty" alright......

And Obama kicks her ass in the polls right now so she's not really scaring anybody. In fact, the liberals would love it if she won the primary. It would guarantee Obama's re-election!!

 

[Common Sense]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

and Obama has been compared to Kennedy. whats your point? whether you agree or disagree with the comparison is besides the point. Palin is only a polarizing figure on the far right. the only reason people tend to talk about her so much is because the says some odd ball things that the media jumps on. fortunately those of us with ideals rooted in a sane society know that we can keep her out of office easily as she is just too extreme.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Wait for it.. it will all be Bush's fault. Wait for it... wait for it.......

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

and Obama has been compared to Kennedy. whats your point? whether you agree or disagree with the comparison is besides the point. Palin is only a polarizing figure on the far right. the only reason people tend to talk about her so much is because the says some odd ball things that the media jumps on. fortunately those of us with ideals rooted in a sane society know that we can keep her out of office easily as she is just too extreme.

What's the comparison? That they're both nothing more than fluff pieces? Geeze, enough of the Kennedy's.. useless bunch, all of them.

What makes Palin so extreme?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Yea they're just deflecting now. They're in cover-up mode. How could these massive leaks be allowed to happen? DA BOOOOOOSH & Palin didn't do this one. This Administration really screwed the pooch on this one.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

Unstable/bi-polar people can be like that......​

"During the campaign, Palin lashed out at the slightest provocation, sometimes screaming at staff members and throwing objects. Witnessing such behavior, one aide asked Todd Palin if it was typical of his wife. He answered, “You just got to let her go through it… Half the stuff that comes out of her mouth she doesn’t even mean.” When a campaign aide gingerly asked Todd whether Sarah should consider taking psychiatric medication to control her moods, Todd responded that she “just needed to run and work out more.” Her anger kept boiling over, however, and eventually the fits of rage came every day. Then, just as suddenly, her temper would be gone. Palin would apologize and promise to be nicer. Within hours, she would be screaming again. At the end of one long day, when Palin was mid-tirade, a campaign aide remembers thinking, “You were an angel all night. Now you’re a devil. Where did this come from?”

 

[USArmyRetired]

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

Ohhhh.....she's "chesty" alright......

And Obama kicks her ass in the polls right now so she's not really scaring anybody. In fact, the liberals would love it if she won the primary. It would guarantee Obama's re-election!!

Hey if your old enough, you will remember Carter was ahead in the polls by 8 points all the way up until the week before election day with Reagan. Obama has a 39 percent approval rating (like Carter had) across the United States and that is bad. Let all these blunders keep happening and his bad governing and you will see Palin come out on top like Reagan did.

 

[USArmyRetired]

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

Unstable/bi-polar people can be like that......​

"During the campaign, Palin lashed out at the slightest provocation, sometimes screaming at staff members and throwing objects. Witnessing such behavior, one aide asked Todd Palin if it was typical of his wife. He answered, “You just got to let her go through it… Half the stuff that comes out of her mouth she doesn’t even mean.” When a campaign aide gingerly asked Todd whether Sarah should consider taking psychiatric medication to control her moods, Todd responded that she “just needed to run and work out more.” Her anger kept boiling over, however, and eventually the fits of rage came every day. Then, just as suddenly, her temper would be gone. Palin would apologize and promise to be nicer. Within hours, she would be screaming again. At the end of one long day, when Palin was mid-tirade, a campaign aide remembers thinking, “You were an angel all night. Now you’re a devil. Where did this come from?”

Not true and was dismissed as hearsay you liberal wacko. Sign up for the military. Make something of yourself.

 

[Sallow]

Yea they're just deflecting now. They're in cover-up mode. How could these massive leaks be allowed to happen? DA BOOOOOOSH & Palin didn't do this one. This Administration really screwed the pooch on this one.

How exactly?

Where there rule changes to the military classification regime made by the Obama administration?

Please post your link.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

I heard some Liberal Lefties insinuating the same thing. So what's the big deal? Palin didn't say this anyway though. Just more HuffPo & MSLSD Bull Shit propaganda. Don't believe the hype.

 

[Revere]

What would Putin do?

Ex-Russian Spy Poisoned In London - CBS News

 

[LibocalypseNow]

What would Putin do?

Ex-Russian Spy Poisoned In London - CBS News

Yes this is how the Russians handle the spies they catch. Do you really think our Government has the backbone to do that stuff? I doubt it. It just wouldn't happen.

 

[jillian]

I think Palin is right that after the first wikileaks fiasco was done that Obama should have ordered to pursue the wikileaks founder like we do with Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. I believe that this guy is a enemy of the state releasing these classified materials. The left has misinterpreted her facebook posting as thought she wants this man wacked. She put her facebook comments up at 12:17pm today and within 2 hours the left is attacking her and insinuating she wants the man killed when she said no such thing.

All she said was this:

"First and foremost, what steps were taken to stop Wikileaks director Julian Assange from distributing this highly sensitive classified material especially after he had already published material not once but twice in the previous months? Assange is not a “journalist,” any more than the “editor” of al Qaeda’s new English-language magazine Inspire is a “journalist.” He is an anti-American operative with blood on his hands. His past posting of classified documents revealed the identity of more than 100 Afghan sources to the Taliban. Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?"

Does Palin Want to Whack Assange? - The Note

In her latest foray into the national discussion about Wikilleaks, Sarah Palin seems to open the door to the idea that the U.S. Government should have considered a targeted hit on Wilileaks founder Julian Assange.

SNIP~

But in the most eyebrow-raising section of the posting, Palin writes of Assange, “Why was he not pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders?”

Given that the U.S. regularly targets suspected Al Qaeda leaders with missile or drone strikes, is she suggesting that Assange should have been whacked?

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

no... it's that she has the IQ of a turnip and that offends smart people.

as barbara bush said, "she seems to like alaska. i think she should stay there".


what's that emblem btw... in your avi... where were you "based"?

 

[Revere]

Putin called Leo DiCaprio a real man, not Barack Obama!

 

[Revere]

And the rabid right question Obama's citizenship and faith. So what's your point besides your gullibility?

That Sarah has the charisma of Patton, Chesty Puller and other great Americans and it scares the wimpy liberals to death.

no... it's that she has the IQ of a turnip and that offends smart people.

as barbara bush said, "she seems to like alaska. i think she should stay there".


what's that emblem btw... in your avi... where were you "based"?

Look who's giving Dirty Sanchezes to the Bushes!

 

[Greenbeard]

Yes this is how the Russians handle the spies they catch. Do you really think our Government has the backbone to do that stuff? I doubt it. It just wouldn't happen.

Due process is a sign of weakness? Extra-legal murders aren't really the hallmark of small (constitutionally restrained) government, by the way.