Liberal Doves Run As War Hawks

Freewill

Platinum Member
Oct 26, 2011
31,158
5,072
1,130
Democrats once again picking sides more on politics then and moral stand.

Democrat Kay Hagan didn’t mince words about the Iraq War during her 2008 Senate campaign against Republican Elizabeth Dole.
“We need to get out of Iraq in a responsible way,” Hagan declared in May of that year. “We need to elect leaders who don’t invade countries without planning and stay there without an end.”
Hagan is striking a different chord these days. Locked in a tough reelection battle, the first-term senator boasts that she’s more strongly supportive of airstrikes against Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant militants than her Republican challenger, Thom Tillis, and says she’s been pressing the Obama administration to arm Syrian rebels since early last year.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/09/2014-elections-senate-democrats-iraq-syria-111445.html#ixzz3EtKlg5JH
 
Republicans still don't think lying us into an unnecessary war where thousands of Americans died was anything to get upset about.
 
Defense Leaders Warn of Tomahawk Missile Shortage

Defense Leaders Warn of Tomahawk Missile Shortage Washington Free Beacon

As the United States steps up its battle against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL or ISIS), defense leaders on Capitol Hill are raising concerns about a looming shortage in the Tomahawk missile supply, a key offensive weapon that the Navy has deployed against militant strongholds in Syria and elsewhere.
The U.S. Navy’s current reliance on the Tomahawk, known as “the world’s most advanced cruise missile,” comes just months after the Obama administration attempted to significantly cut funding for the weapon and then eliminate it completely it in 2016, a move that drew heavy criticism from defense experts and lawmakers.
 
Republicans still don't think lying us into an unnecessary war where thousands of Americans died was anything to get upset about.

Congress and Hillary voted that action was required, why must we continue to remind you? I am sure you will hold you nose and vote for the War Hawk Hillary so please quit with the BS theatrics. Thanks.
 
And yet, even though there is enormous evidence proving that both parties are very much alike, many Americans continue to believe they are different.

Both parties contain many who are warmongering interventionist fools.

BO is even more a warmonger than W....Greenwald outlines it here....

SYRIA BECOMES THE 7TH PREDOMINANTLY MUSLIM COUNTRY BOMBED BY 2009 NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE
Syria Becomes the 7th Predominantly Muslim Country Bombed by 2009 Nobel Peace Laureate - The Intercept

You would think that this war that Obama is getting into would have some sort of vote by congress. Yes, they did vote on the foolishness of arming another ME group but full blown war?

BTW Tomahawk missiles cost well over 1 million dollars each.
 
And yet, even though there is enormous evidence proving that both parties are very much alike, many Americans continue to believe they are different.

Both parties contain many who are warmongering interventionist fools.

BO is even more a warmonger than W....Greenwald outlines it here....

SYRIA BECOMES THE 7TH PREDOMINANTLY MUSLIM COUNTRY BOMBED BY 2009 NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE
Syria Becomes the 7th Predominantly Muslim Country Bombed by 2009 Nobel Peace Laureate - The Intercept

You would think that this war that Obama is getting into would have some sort of vote by congress. Yes, they did vote on the foolishness of arming another ME group but full blown war?

BTW Tomahawk missiles cost well over 1 million dollars each.

You certainly would, if the USA were a constitutional republic.

If we had an opposition party, they would be screaming about Obama's actions.

Even the liberal NY Times recognizes Obama's betrayal.
Obama’s Betrayal of the Constitution
PRESIDENT OBAMA’s declaration of war against the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria marks a decisive break in the American constitutional tradition. Nothing attempted by his predecessor, George W. Bush, remotely compares in imperial hubris.

Mr. Bush gained explicit congressional consent for his invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. In contrast, the Obama administration has not even published a legal opinion attempting to justify the president’s assertion of unilateral war-making authority. This is because no serious opinion can be written.

This became clear when White House officials briefed reporters before Mr. Obama’s speech to the nation on Wednesday evening. They said a war against ISIS was justified by Congress’s authorization of force against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and that no new approval was needed.

But the 2001 authorization for the use of military force does not apply here. That resolution — scaled back from what Mr. Bush initially wanted — extended only to nations and organizations that “planned, authorized, committed or aided” the 9/11 attacks.

more here http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/opinion/obamas-betrayal-of-the-constitution.html?referrer=&_r=0
 
And yet, even though there is enormous evidence proving that both parties are very much alike, many Americans continue to believe they are different.

Both parties contain many who are warmongering interventionist fools.

BO is even more a warmonger than W....Greenwald outlines it here....

SYRIA BECOMES THE 7TH PREDOMINANTLY MUSLIM COUNTRY BOMBED BY 2009 NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE
Syria Becomes the 7th Predominantly Muslim Country Bombed by 2009 Nobel Peace Laureate - The Intercept

You would think that this war that Obama is getting into would have some sort of vote by congress. Yes, they did vote on the foolishness of arming another ME group but full blown war?

BTW Tomahawk missiles cost well over 1 million dollars each.

You certainly would, if the USA were a constitutional republic.

If we had an opposition party, they would be screaming about Obama's actions.

Even the liberal NY Times recognizes Obama's betrayal.
Obama’s Betrayal of the Constitution
PRESIDENT OBAMA’s declaration of war against the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria marks a decisive break in the American constitutional tradition. Nothing attempted by his predecessor, George W. Bush, remotely compares in imperial hubris.

Mr. Bush gained explicit congressional consent for his invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. In contrast, the Obama administration has not even published a legal opinion attempting to justify the president’s assertion of unilateral war-making authority. This is because no serious opinion can be written.

This became clear when White House officials briefed reporters before Mr. Obama’s speech to the nation on Wednesday evening. They said a war against ISIS was justified by Congress’s authorization of force against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and that no new approval was needed.

But the 2001 authorization for the use of military force does not apply here. That resolution — scaled back from what Mr. Bush initially wanted — extended only to nations and organizations that “planned, authorized, committed or aided” the 9/11 attacks.

more here http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/opinion/obamas-betrayal-of-the-constitution.html?referrer=&_r=0

Notice that the left wing doves are all hiding in their coop.
 
And yet, even though there is enormous evidence proving that both parties are very much alike, many Americans continue to believe they are different.

Both parties contain many who are warmongering interventionist fools.

BO is even more a warmonger than W....Greenwald outlines it here....

SYRIA BECOMES THE 7TH PREDOMINANTLY MUSLIM COUNTRY BOMBED BY 2009 NOBEL PEACE LAUREATE
Syria Becomes the 7th Predominantly Muslim Country Bombed by 2009 Nobel Peace Laureate - The Intercept

You would think that this war that Obama is getting into would have some sort of vote by congress. Yes, they did vote on the foolishness of arming another ME group but full blown war?

BTW Tomahawk missiles cost well over 1 million dollars each.

You certainly would, if the USA were a constitutional republic.

If we had an opposition party, they would be screaming about Obama's actions.

Even the liberal NY Times recognizes Obama's betrayal.
Obama’s Betrayal of the Constitution
PRESIDENT OBAMA’s declaration of war against the terrorist group known as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria marks a decisive break in the American constitutional tradition. Nothing attempted by his predecessor, George W. Bush, remotely compares in imperial hubris.

Mr. Bush gained explicit congressional consent for his invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. In contrast, the Obama administration has not even published a legal opinion attempting to justify the president’s assertion of unilateral war-making authority. This is because no serious opinion can be written.

This became clear when White House officials briefed reporters before Mr. Obama’s speech to the nation on Wednesday evening. They said a war against ISIS was justified by Congress’s authorization of force against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, and that no new approval was needed.

But the 2001 authorization for the use of military force does not apply here. That resolution — scaled back from what Mr. Bush initially wanted — extended only to nations and organizations that “planned, authorized, committed or aided” the 9/11 attacks.

more here http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/09/12/opinion/obamas-betrayal-of-the-constitution.html?referrer=&_r=0

Notice that the left wing doves are all hiding in their coop.

Could it be they really aren't shameless?

This is so true...
price.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top