lets remember who we are up against

Obama is "up against" the majority of Americans.
AP-GfK Poll: Obama Re-Election Odds Roughly 50-50 - TIME
That's misleading. It's not 50-50:
For the first time, the poll found that a majority of adults, 52 percent, said Obama should be voted out of office while 43 percent said he deserves another term. The numbers mark a reversal since last May, when 53 percent said Obama should be re-elected while 43 percent said he didn't deserve four more years. Obama's overall job approval stands at a new low, with 44 percent approving and 54 percent disapproving. The president's standing among independents is worse: Thirty-eight percent approve while 59 percent disapprove.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
The republicans put the language in the bill and also put in lauguage in the bill that makes it impossible for it to be used the Way people are claiming.

This was designed to harm Obama and the country wether it was vetoed or signed.
 
The republicans put the language in the bill and also put in lauguage in the bill that makes it impossible for it to be used the Way people are claiming.

This was designed to harm Obama and the country wether it was vetoed or signed.

Okay. Then name the Republicans who did it.
 
The republicans put the language in the bill and also put in lauguage in the bill that makes it impossible for it to be used the Way people are claiming.

This was designed to harm Obama and the country wether it was vetoed or signed.

Why don't you just fucking blow me.
 
From Sen. Carl Levin's website:
Carl Levin - United States Senator for Michigan: Newsroom - Press Releases
The bill as passed in the Senate addressed this issue by including language that: (1) left it to the President to adopt procedures to determine who is a foreign al Qaeda terrorist and therefore subject to presumed military detention; (2) required that those procedures not interfere with ongoing intelligence, surveillance, or interrogations by civilian law enforcement; (3) left it to the executive branch to determine whether a military detainee who will be tried is tried by a civilian court or a military court; and (4) gave the Executive Branch broad waiver authority.
Anyone wanna' show me where US Citizens are protected or exempted from this?
 
Last edited:
From Sen. Carl Levin's website:
Carl Levin - United States Senator for Michigan: Newsroom - Press Releases
The bill as passed in the Senate addressed this issue by including language that: (1) left it to the President to adopt procedures to determine who is a foreign al Qaeda terrorist and therefore subject to presumed military detention; (2) required that those procedures not interfere with ongoing intelligence, surveillance, or interrogations by civilian law enforcement; (3) left it to the executive branch to determine whether a military detainee who will be tried is tried by a civilian court or a military court; and (4) gave the Executive Branch broad waiver authority.
Anyone wanna' show me where US Citizens are protected or exempted from this?

Why be concerned about indefinite detainment?

Not long ago, Obama executed a citizen w/o a trial. Being stuck in prison is nothing compared to being executed by being bombed.
 
The republicans put the language in the bill and also put in lauguage in the bill that makes it impossible for it to be used the Way people are claiming.

This was designed to harm Obama and the country wether it was vetoed or signed.

Still gonna get you that spell checker for Christmas ;)

((((hugs TM))))
:D
 

Forum List

Back
Top