Less nukes? sure!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Rambunctious, Apr 11, 2010.

  1. Rambunctious
    Online

    Rambunctious Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,620
    Thanks Received:
    818
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,995
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    Every time someone (sincerely) asks why Iran feels they NEED nuclear-weapons, I've often-thought....all an Iranian needs to do is point to IRAQ....as an example of what happens when you DON'T have nukes/WMDs.

    It'd be (exactly) the same as askin' some "conservative" John-Wayne-fan/Texan why HE needs a hand-gun.

    (...Or, is that too-much consistency, for the average-"conservative"??????)​
     
  3. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    What a fucking spammer. You don't even know what it is you are commenting on.

    What a waste your posts are.
     
  4. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    Yeah....you read the entire-article.

    Sure.

    :rolleyes:
     
  5. rightwinger
    Offline

    rightwinger Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    120,549
    Thanks Received:
    19,880
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    NJ & MD
    Ratings:
    +45,540
    Give me a dozen nukes and the ability to strike with precision and I will be happy
     
  6. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    What 'article'? Your spam post? How might that spam post relate to the OP? Do tell.
     
  7. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    ....And, safe.

    (....At least, from Porky Limbaugh's base; i.e. the RNC.)
     
  8. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    Hyper-text-challenged, are you????

    :rolleyes:
     
  9. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    41,538
    Thanks Received:
    6,382
    Trophy Points:
    1,810
    Location:
    St. Eligius
    Ratings:
    +8,703
    Funny...such a simple question, yet the spammer can't answer it. No surprise.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. fyrenza
    Offline

    fyrenza Ariel Looney Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,086
    Thanks Received:
    377
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    south Texas
    Ratings:
    +378
    I believe the prob wasn't in whether the poster READ what was at that link,

    but more a matter of questioning the validity of the opinions expressed therein.

    You know, my logical/reasoning side screams NOOOOOOO! to nukes for Iran,

    but my emotional/barbaric side says, HELL, YEAH! Give 'em ALL nukes, and by this time, next month, we won't have to worry about ANY of 'em!

    <sigh>

    The jury's still out.
     

Share This Page