Lefty HATRED of Sarah exposed.

Excerpts:

November 18, 2009
The Palin Experience
By David Harsanyi

These days, where you fall on the crucial issue of Sarah Palin tells the rest of us all we need to know about your character. You're either A) a scum-sucking, terror-loving elitist or B) a radical, tea bag-loving simpleton.

Yet believe it or not, one can (as I do) admire Palin's charisma and roots, appreciate her dissent on the policy experiments brainy folks in Washington are cooking up and, at the same time, believe she has no business running for president in 2012.

In fact, all you haters out there motivate me to root for her.





RealClearPolitics - The Palin Experience

There, you figured out the evil genius of we Palin 'haters'. We intentionally get under the skin of the right and infuriate them and cause them to rally around Palin and push the Republican party to nominate her in 2012, out of spite, and thus guarantee another term for President Obama.
 
And she's calling it sexist that Newsweek put that picture of her, all MILF'ed up and desecrating the American flag, on their cover. The picture she got paid to pose for.:lol:
 
I love this "The Left Fears Palin" stuff....please run Palin in 2012. Pretty Please....with sugar on top.

The Conservatives need something to talk about

By 2012, you and the rest of the political world would have forgotten about Palin. Right now, she is trying to milk the conservative base for their money with her good ol folksy charm..

Milk them like a cow, Sarah!! Every penny they give to you takes away from the Conservative Party!! Milk 'em for every dime!!

It's been several years since the republican party was 'conservative'.

I am really hoping that the conservatives in the Republican party show us how it is done and strike out on their own.

I doubt that they will.
 
I had no idea we were hiding it

Do you hate Palin? Cuz I was of the opinion that most liberals don't hate Palin, they just disagree with her politics. Like me (and many on the right) with Obama. Don't hate the man, just disagree with his political views.

You apparently weren't here for the hate fest against her during the election.

The main themes were: #1, she's a slut, #2, she's stupid, #3, she's lying and her retarded (that's Ravi's term) son is her daughter's first child, and not her own, #3, she's a pimp (pimpette?) because her daughter got pregnant, #4, she illegally used her influence to get her LOSER brother in law fired from the state police and about a dozen more things which really had nothing to do with her politicis or her abilities as a policy maker.

But do carry on as if that didn't happen.
 
The thought that anyone is afraid of Sarah Palin is a riot.

The only reason shes still in the news is because of her book deal.

Most Americans wouldnt trust her to mow their yard without giving up.

I'm sure you would love to believe that.

I bet if you asked Americans if they trusted her more or less then Obama and the Democrats right now I think you would get a very disappointing result.



Yeah--"None of the above" and "Why am I forced to make that choice" would be very common disappointing results.
 
LEFTY HATRED OF SARAH EXPOSED.

Just watched O'Reilly who with Monica Crowley DECIMATED the continuing and recent Lefty vitriol against Sarah. The focus was on the question : "WHY DO THE LEFTIES QUIVER WITH HATE AT THE VERY THOUGHT OF SARAH PALIN ? "

Answer: FEAR.

The Lefties FEAR Sarah because she stands for the very core values that Lefties despise: She is not an elitist. She appears as an ordinary woman who is NOT a graduate of Harvard, or Yale. Sarah knocked around and got a degree from the University of Idaho.....a happenstance that alone would have driven a hardcore Lefty into Maj Hasan's psychyatric care for Post Traumatic Stress. Sarah rose to national prominence as a Governor of a politically insignificant state. Who is Pro Life, and Pro Gun. Sarah does NOT come across as the polished POLITICIANS do with their doubletalk, and obfuscations. Sarah appears as being open, and honest with her views and lives her life on a down to earth basis.......characteristics opposite the Liberal Lefties ultimate idol, the PC polished Political Charlatan Hussein Obami-Salami and his corrupt spouse who revels in her position as Da First Lady with her hundred plus servants, while Laura Bush had only one, and even Hellary had three.

It did not come as a surprise when some typical Lefty Feminist media pundit came out with the typical scurrilous diatribe against Sarah. And some New York Times columinst called Sarah "a joke". These constant attacks against Sarah at first glance seem perplexing. Why attack a person who no longer has any official politcal standing ? Sarah no loner holds any political office. She had, actually, a very small positive political rating in the election. And, by all calculations, should have been relegated to the political dust bowl after the presidential election ?

Answer: POTENTIAL.

Sarah Palin is a CLEAVER exposing the HYPOCRITICAL Lefty Feminists with their Lefty Agenda. Let's not minimize the fact that the LEFTY FEMINISTS have a big say in the control of the Dem Party. MOST of the voters in the Dem Party are women.They despise Sarah on the ABORTION ISSUE. Sarah has FIVE KIDS, and one is with the Downs Syndrome......a big NO! NO! NO ! for the LEFTY feminists. The HYPOCRITICAL LEFTY FEMINISTS have the IMPOSSIBLE TASK of explaining away the fact that any rational person would question: "Why aren't these FEMINIST HYPOCRITES in a continuous state of multiple orgasms at the very thought that HELLARY and SARAH would be the TWO FEMALES running for the Presidency of America ?!?!?!?"

Clearly, Sarah Palin's POTENTIAL is an obvious threat because of her indisputable STAR QUALITY that seems to be lacking, at least at the present, in the Republican Party. Polls are showing that the Political Charlatan Hussein Obami-Salami's rating are slipping as his true Marxist/Socialistic Agenda is being revealed. Obami's Muslim protective PC stance, Foreign Policy dithering, obfuscations, and a total lack of transparency as exemplified by the blatant "behind the doors" Pelosi's congressional shenanigans are driving the Independents in droves away from the chances of this Marxist Charlatan's re-election.

Like it or not, Sarah Palin and her pronouncements against Big Govt, and Big Govt Intrusion, hypocritical PC, etc, is the most OBVIOUS threat to the hysterically frantic Dems. On the O'Reilly Fair & Balanced show, Colmes made a valiant attempt at defending the current slurs against Sarah by echoing the Lefty sentiment that Sarah "is a joke". He made a big show of rejecting the term depicting Sarah as a "joke". Instead, Colmes showed the Lefty's disdain by referring to Sarah simply as an inconsequential source of "amusement". O'Reilly deftly skewered Colmes by cornering him with the question (paraphrased): "Does it make sense to pour out such a torrent of hatred against something pleasurable as 'amusement' ?" "Why so much hatred against a Ferris Wheel ? "

The Lefties invariably attack Sarah by voicing the criticisms of their newly found allies: The McCain Losers. The hypocrisy of the "McCain Losers" is easily explained. These mamby pamby Republicans lost their bid for the Presidency. They hypocritically subverted Sarah's criticisms of their ineffective strategy during the election and are covering their rectums. That is why they are now joining up with their sleazy erstwhile opponents. True to their most obvious trait, the Lefty Dems are resorting to their hypocrisy by lying that they are actually PRAYING that Sarah Palin would be the Republican Nominee for the Presidency of the United States.

These Professional Lefty Hypocrites PRAYING for Sarah's Republican Nomination ?!?!? SURE.....Their unstoppable torrent of vitriol against Sarah is incontrovertible, indisputable PROOF of their HYSTERICAL FEAR of Sarah Palin and her POTENTIAL.

Truly the rantings of a madman.

Quentin, Yours is the typical Libtard's meaningless response.

Do you really think that anyone is interested in some OBVIOUS FOOL'S opinion that isn't backed up by some valid reasons or FACTS ?

Your unsubstantiated opinion has all the tout ensemble of a fart in a hurricane.
 
First of all palin's an idiot politically. And her rise to fame is only that she was supported by mccain as his v.p. palin herself does not have the political skill, tact, or wisdom quite frankly to obtain the presidency


15 posts and not one properly constructed sentence. Impressive.
 
Did David Frum really say this about Sarah Palin? Apparently so, and on PBS:

This is a woman who has got into a position of leadership by sending very powerful sexual signals. And we see that in the way that men like her much more than women do.

With this line of attack, David seems to be channeling his inner Andrew Sullivan.

(By the way, when I saw her campaign in N.H., I was surrounded by moms with strollers.)

She's Sending, but He Ain't Receivin' - Mark Steyn - The Corner on National Review Online

I also read this morning that the Newsweek photo may not have been legal. I'm not sure if they didn't get Runner's World's ok, or Palin's, but somebody is suing. I hope they win.
 
First of all palin's an idiot politically. And her rise to fame is only that she was supported by mccain as his v.p. palin herself does not have the political skill, tact, or wisdom quite frankly to obtain the presidency


15 posts and not one properly constructed sentence. Impressive.

And the more educated Libtard political idiots are just as idiotic.
 
And she's calling it sexist that Newsweek put that picture of her, all MILF'ed up and desecrating the American flag, on their cover. The picture she got paid to pose for.:lol:

Bless your little partisan heart, you're really not very smart are ya?

The photo was taken for Runner's World - a sports magazine. The Newsweek cover was out of context and sexist.... and if that's what you call descrating the flag, I assume you are also equally as insulted when anti-war protestors burn it, or Code Pink denegrate it too, right?

Palin (not she, she has a name) got paid by Runner's World - not by Newsweek. If Newsweek ran it without consent then, not only was it sexist, it was also illegal.

Do feel free to ignore fact in favor of stupid partisan whines.
 

Forum List

Back
Top