Leftist Policy And The Parkland Killings

[PoliticalChic]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

 

[Brain357]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

 

[PoliticalChic]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

You can run, but you can't hide...

So saith the Brown Bomber


Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

 

[Brain357]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

You can run, but you can't hide...

So saith the Brown Bomber


Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Ah the queen of copy and paste. It’s cute how all you can do is repeat yourself. I’ve given you the facts. Here’s one.

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a school shooting problem.

 

[Brain357]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

You can run, but you can't hide...

So saith the Brown Bomber


Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Ah the queen of copy and paste. It’s cute how all you can do is repeat yourself. I’ve given you the facts. Here’s one.

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a school shooting problem.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

You can run, but you can't hide...

So saith the Brown Bomber


Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Ah the queen of copy and paste. It’s cute how all you can do is repeat yourself. I’ve given you the facts. Here’s one.

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a school shooting problem.

So I've forced you to admit that carry permit holders are the most law abiding folks in the country.



Excellent.

 

[Brain357]

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

You can run, but you can't hide...

So saith the Brown Bomber


Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.

Ah the queen of copy and paste. It’s cute how all you can do is repeat yourself. I’ve given you the facts. Here’s one.

Countries with strong gun control don’t have a school shooting problem.

So I've forced you to admit that carry permit holders are the most law abiding folks in the country.



Excellent.

Not at all. You ask an impossible question as I only have a small sampling of the crimes they commit. I however have proven how much violent crime increases with carry laws.

 

[BlindBoo]

Broward County deputies received at least 18 calls warning them about Nikolas Cruz from 2008 to 2017, including concerns that he "planned to shoot up the school" and other threats and acts of violence before he was accused of killing 17 people at a high school.

The warnings, made by concerned people close to Cruz, came in phone calls to the Broward County Sheriff's Office, records show. At least five callers mentioned concern over his access to weapons, according to the documents. None of those warnings led to direct intervention.

Florida school shooting: Sheriff got 18 calls about Nikolas Cruz's violence, threats, guns

Now back to yer regularly scheduled "Obama, Obama, Obama" Mantra.

 

[Brain357]

The US has had 57 times as many school shootings as the other major industrialized nations combined

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/05/21/us/school-shooting-us-versus-world-trnd/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

All those other countries have strong gun control...

 

[protectionist]

No, but apparently they do you.

1. Schools are not run from.the federal level.

2. The point of the program was to minimize race as a criteria for police involvement.

The idea was to not send minorities out into the world with undeserved criminal records earned for minor offenses that were passed over if the perpetrator was white. Not to pass up real criminals.

No evidence that whites were passed over in any way. You present zero. No matter what the idiotic "idea" might have been, it was a clear cut squash of what liberals constantly preach that they want. Gun control by tight background checks.

Here we have gun sellers unable to see the criminal background of gun buyers (ex. Nicholas Cruz), and many dead people as a result. Hang your head in severe shame, for supporting this PP abomination.

 

[daveman]

The book rates number one on Amazon in these categories..

• #1 in School Safety
• #1 in Political Commentary & Opinion
• #1 in Education Administration

....is the one that reveals the role that Obama's Leftist policy played in the slaughter of 17 innocents at the Parkland High School.

1. All the talk about 'background checks' is for naught because Leftist policy made certain that the mass killer at Parkland was spared any blight on his record that would have red-flagged his background, and made him ineligible to purchase the gun.



2. Liberals, the Democrat Obama administration, imposed regulations on schools that forbid police being called when felonious students run amuck.

As a result of the school's acquiescence to the Democrat/ Liberal protocol, Nikolas Cruz had no police record, and was able to pass a background check and purchase the gun that killed 17 innocents.
One more tragedy at the intersection of Liberalism and education.



3. The Obama regulation that schools were forced to abide by, and that police departments were bribed into accepting, allowed the Florida shooter to buy his weapons.

“One of the people impacted by this new policy was the murderer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Because of the new reporting (or non-reporting) system, the murderer had 21 incidents at the school that were not referred to the police. The police then were called to his home 39 times. Not once was this person taken to the police station and charged with anything and kept overnight. If just once he had been, he would not have passed his background check and he would never have been able to acquire a legal weapon of any kind.



4. Every time people speak of issues like gun control, they will point to “if we can just save one life.” Here 17 lives were lost because of a failed social policy that has spread throughout the country.

This weekend, students from Parkland fanned out across the country to preach gun control and speak at gun control rallies. Their ignorance of the policies that were put in place by social engineering bureaucrats that directly led to this massacre hovers over them as they preach of false gods.”
How Social Engineering Led to the Parkland Massacre=



5. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received at least 45 calls related to Cruz and his brother dating back to 2008 – including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.

Their inaction reflects the Broward department’s embrace of the school district’s approach to student crime. Even in response to a major crime scene, Sheriff Israel agreed to defer to school officials when “feasible” and employ “the least punitive means of discipline” against the perpetrators. https://www.realclearinvestigations...cipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html



Every time you hear some screed from the Left/Democrats about the evil of the Right, remember Parkland, and know that they are simply lying about something that they are responsible for.

Buncha RWNJ propaganda.

Your acceptance of reality is neither sought nor required. And it damn sure isn't expected.

What reality?

The one that shows short-sighted leftist policies got people killed. Again.

 

[RealDave]

Now please explain the cause of the 289 mass shootings just this year, 2019. Go ahead.
There have been 289 mass shootings in the US so far in 2019 — here's the full list

Gun Free Zones - all of them. Only a liberal wouldn't know that.

Parkland had armed guards assfuck.

 

[daveman]

What reality?

The reality is that gun nutters want to talk about ANYTHING so long as it leads to NO CHANGE

Given the reality of law enforcement's incompetence years before the shooting in regard to warnings about the shooter's behavior, what proposal do you have that would have prevented the shooting?

 

[daveman]

The book rates number one on Amazon in these categories..

• #1 in School Safety
• #1 in Political Commentary & Opinion
• #1 in Education Administration

....is the one that reveals the role that Obama's Leftist policy played in the slaughter of 17 innocents at the Parkland High School.

1. All the talk about 'background checks' is for naught because Leftist policy made certain that the mass killer at Parkland was spared any blight on his record that would have red-flagged his background, and made him ineligible to purchase the gun.



2. Liberals, the Democrat Obama administration, imposed regulations on schools that forbid police being called when felonious students run amuck.

As a result of the school's acquiescence to the Democrat/ Liberal protocol, Nikolas Cruz had no police record, and was able to pass a background check and purchase the gun that killed 17 innocents.
One more tragedy at the intersection of Liberalism and education.



3. The Obama regulation that schools were forced to abide by, and that police departments were bribed into accepting, allowed the Florida shooter to buy his weapons.

“One of the people impacted by this new policy was the murderer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Because of the new reporting (or non-reporting) system, the murderer had 21 incidents at the school that were not referred to the police. The police then were called to his home 39 times. Not once was this person taken to the police station and charged with anything and kept overnight. If just once he had been, he would not have passed his background check and he would never have been able to acquire a legal weapon of any kind.



4. Every time people speak of issues like gun control, they will point to “if we can just save one life.” Here 17 lives were lost because of a failed social policy that has spread throughout the country.

This weekend, students from Parkland fanned out across the country to preach gun control and speak at gun control rallies. Their ignorance of the policies that were put in place by social engineering bureaucrats that directly led to this massacre hovers over them as they preach of false gods.”
How Social Engineering Led to the Parkland Massacre=



5. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received at least 45 calls related to Cruz and his brother dating back to 2008 – including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.

Their inaction reflects the Broward department’s embrace of the school district’s approach to student crime. Even in response to a major crime scene, Sheriff Israel agreed to defer to school officials when “feasible” and employ “the least punitive means of discipline” against the perpetrators. https://www.realclearinvestigations...cipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html



Every time you hear some screed from the Left/Democrats about the evil of the Right, remember Parkland, and know that they are simply lying about something that they are responsible for.

Buncha RWNJ propaganda.

You can always be counted on for the most vapid, least substantive post of the day.

The biggest difference between my post and yours?

Mine is true.

Stamping your feet and pouting isn't a compelling argument, Skippy.

 

[daveman]

I saw Mark Glaze, former executive director of Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, and later Everytown for Gun Safety, on Tucker Carlson’s show, discussing the school shootings.
Glaze made all of the well-known arguments for gun control….and then Carlson asked him if he thought the Promise Program contributed to the horrifying incident.

He said he was unaware of the program, had never heard of it.
Just like most Liberals/Democrats.

This anti-gun, anti-NRA, anti-Bill of Rights spokesperson, unaware of the single greatest contributor to Nikolas Cruz’s ability to slaughter 17 human beings.


If you are a Democrat, a Liberal, a gun-control supporter….I’m betting that you are, also, unaware.
And I’ll bet that you are unaware of the fact that the actions of Barack Obama played a far greater role in the massacre than the NRA.
It's a fact.





Here's how that happened.
While puzzling over why black students had a graduation rate of only 61 percent compared to 81 percent for white students, and as a result, a lower college admission rate, it was determined that it was largely because of their arrest rates.
Another fact was revealed: “black students made up two-thirds of all suspensions during the 2011-2012 school year despite comprising only 40 percent of the student body.”
Obama Program May Have Helped Nikolas Cruz Slip Through the Cracks



Using the usual Liberal divining rod, and looking for ways to hide.....er, correct the behavior that led to suspensions and arrests,…. These deep thinkers deduced that it must be racial bias leading to the arrests.

Using the power, status and treasury of government….”President Obama’s program rewarded local governments with grants if they kept school arrests down.’
And he threatened to charge them with racism if they didn't!!!




Get it?

Schools no longer suspended miscreants, and police….like the Broward Sheriff’s Department, no longer arrested those eligible.
Nikolas Cruz committed numerous acts that made him eligible for suspension and arrest…in a sane world.

But he wasn’t arrested, because of the Obama program.




You didn’t know this….did you?

Did you know that The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

Well, c'mon, it's not like leftists ever consider the consequences of their actions beyond the immediate warm-fuzzy they get.

Yes like letting people legally buy weapons for mass killing. What could go wrong?

If it weren't for the Obama Admin's policy, Cruz would not have been able to legally purchase a firearm.

Thank you for proving OP's point.

 

[daveman]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

Countries with strong gun control don’t have regular mass shootings.

Can you really be this stupid?????


. “Obama In Paris: Mass Shootings Don’t Happen In Other Countries…. The only problem with his answer was that he was standing in Paris, where a mass shooting conducted by Islamic State terrorists had just taken place, killing over 100 people.”
Obama In Paris: Mass Shootings Don’t Happen In Other Countries | Breitbart



“'Children's bodies are everywhere': NINETEEN people are killed in Crimean school massacre after student walks into canteen and opens fire –“ Crimea shooting: NINETEEN people are killed in school massacre | Daily Mail Online



You must be a 'Brain' in the same way normal folks call some 'Einstein.'

I notice your examples are years old. We often have these things weekly. You too stupid to see the difference?

Mother Jones, noted NRA propaganda mouthpiece, has some stats you might find interesting.

 

[daveman]

Just as Hussein removed all the troops from Iraq so that ISIS would have no resistance, Liberals make certain that mass killers are not blocked in any way, with their gun-free zones.



"Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows"
According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, from the 1950’s through July 10th of 2016, 98.4 percent of mass shootings have occurred on gun-free zones, with just 1.6 percent occurring where citizens are allowed to have firearms with them."
Over 98% of mass shootings occurred on gun-free zones, research shows


When will you Leftists take responsibility for the killings?

Was it a gun free zone in TX when that guy gunned down all that law enforcement?

Are you referring to the five officers killed after Obama encourages hatred of police?



Or this?

"Obama Met With Ferguson Activists – Said He’s Concerned They “Stay on Course”
President Obama met with Ferguson protest leaders on November 5th, the day after the midterm elections. The meeting was not onhis daily schedule. He was concerned that the protesters“stay on course.”

What does that mean?" Obama Met With Ferguson Activists - Said He's Concerned They "Stay on Course" - The Gateway Pundit



“stay on course.”

What does that mean?"

Total Cost of Ferguson Riots




Obama and Democrat policy -.> chaos and murder

Those gunned down in TX. Was that a gun free zone? Why do you want law enforcement killed regularly? It is rare in countries with strong gun control.

Do you think LEO are bound by "gun-free zone" signs?

That's just tremendously stupid.

 

[daveman]

The book rates number one on Amazon in these categories..

• #1 in School Safety
• #1 in Political Commentary & Opinion
• #1 in Education Administration

....is the one that reveals the role that Obama's Leftist policy played in the slaughter of 17 innocents at the Parkland High School.

1. All the talk about 'background checks' is for naught because Leftist policy made certain that the mass killer at Parkland was spared any blight on his record that would have red-flagged his background, and made him ineligible to purchase the gun.



2. Liberals, the Democrat Obama administration, imposed regulations on schools that forbid police being called when felonious students run amuck.

As a result of the school's acquiescence to the Democrat/ Liberal protocol, Nikolas Cruz had no police record, and was able to pass a background check and purchase the gun that killed 17 innocents.
One more tragedy at the intersection of Liberalism and education.



3. The Obama regulation that schools were forced to abide by, and that police departments were bribed into accepting, allowed the Florida shooter to buy his weapons.

“One of the people impacted by this new policy was the murderer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Because of the new reporting (or non-reporting) system, the murderer had 21 incidents at the school that were not referred to the police. The police then were called to his home 39 times. Not once was this person taken to the police station and charged with anything and kept overnight. If just once he had been, he would not have passed his background check and he would never have been able to acquire a legal weapon of any kind.



4. Every time people speak of issues like gun control, they will point to “if we can just save one life.” Here 17 lives were lost because of a failed social policy that has spread throughout the country.

This weekend, students from Parkland fanned out across the country to preach gun control and speak at gun control rallies. Their ignorance of the policies that were put in place by social engineering bureaucrats that directly led to this massacre hovers over them as they preach of false gods.”
How Social Engineering Led to the Parkland Massacre=



5. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received at least 45 calls related to Cruz and his brother dating back to 2008 – including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.

Their inaction reflects the Broward department’s embrace of the school district’s approach to student crime. Even in response to a major crime scene, Sheriff Israel agreed to defer to school officials when “feasible” and employ “the least punitive means of discipline” against the perpetrators. https://www.realclearinvestigations...cipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html



Every time you hear some screed from the Left/Democrats about the evil of the Right, remember Parkland, and know that they are simply lying about something that they are responsible for.

There was an armed guard at the school. He was afraid to go in. I bet he was a Republican.

Remember when the nuts told us if there was just one hero with a gun? Now it needs to be a damn army. Hell with kids lives, sell guns.

Remember when irrational gun-phobics told us criminals would obey gun laws?

Now they tell us there needs to be even more laws.

 

[daveman]

The book rates number one on Amazon in these categories..

• #1 in School Safety
• #1 in Political Commentary & Opinion
• #1 in Education Administration

....is the one that reveals the role that Obama's Leftist policy played in the slaughter of 17 innocents at the Parkland High School.

1. All the talk about 'background checks' is for naught because Leftist policy made certain that the mass killer at Parkland was spared any blight on his record that would have red-flagged his background, and made him ineligible to purchase the gun.



2. Liberals, the Democrat Obama administration, imposed regulations on schools that forbid police being called when felonious students run amuck.

As a result of the school's acquiescence to the Democrat/ Liberal protocol, Nikolas Cruz had no police record, and was able to pass a background check and purchase the gun that killed 17 innocents.
One more tragedy at the intersection of Liberalism and education.



3. The Obama regulation that schools were forced to abide by, and that police departments were bribed into accepting, allowed the Florida shooter to buy his weapons.

“One of the people impacted by this new policy was the murderer at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Because of the new reporting (or non-reporting) system, the murderer had 21 incidents at the school that were not referred to the police. The police then were called to his home 39 times. Not once was this person taken to the police station and charged with anything and kept overnight. If just once he had been, he would not have passed his background check and he would never have been able to acquire a legal weapon of any kind.



4. Every time people speak of issues like gun control, they will point to “if we can just save one life.” Here 17 lives were lost because of a failed social policy that has spread throughout the country.

This weekend, students from Parkland fanned out across the country to preach gun control and speak at gun control rallies. Their ignorance of the policies that were put in place by social engineering bureaucrats that directly led to this massacre hovers over them as they preach of false gods.”
How Social Engineering Led to the Parkland Massacre=



5. The Broward County Sheriff’s Office received at least 45 calls related to Cruz and his brother dating back to 2008 – including a February 2016 call from a neighbor warning he made a threat on Instagram to "shoot up" the high school, and another last November advising he was collecting guns and knives and appeared to be "a school shooter in the making." Though deputies visited Cruz at his home, they did not try to recover his weapons, despite requests from relatives who feared he planned to use them on his classmates.

Their inaction reflects the Broward department’s embrace of the school district’s approach to student crime. Even in response to a major crime scene, Sheriff Israel agreed to defer to school officials when “feasible” and employ “the least punitive means of discipline” against the perpetrators. https://www.realclearinvestigations...cipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html



Every time you hear some screed from the Left/Democrats about the evil of the Right, remember Parkland, and know that they are simply lying about something that they are responsible for.

There was an armed guard at the school. He was afraid to go in. I bet he was a Republican.

Remember when the nuts told us if there was just one hero with a gun? Now it needs to be a damn army. Hell with kids lives, sell guns.

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)

VPC: Concealed Carry Killers

Really? They count suicide as "non-self-defense".

This trash is dismissed.

 

[daveman]

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/danvergano/more-guns-more-crime


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Nonsense.

Let's check with the CDC.

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5214.pdf


The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws or combinations of laws reviewed on violent outcomes.

Geez that is old. We hardly had concealed carry then. Now we see what is happening:

Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Let's try again.....I know that mathematics may be a prob for Liberals...but I wrote this:

Gun laws are only aimed at the most law-abiding folks in the nation.

1. Permit holders are extremely law abiding. They would lose their permits for any weapons-related infraction. It doesn’t happen
   1. Example: “Of the 51,078 permits that have been issued by the state since the law took effect in 2007, 44 permit holders have been charged with a crime while using a firearm through late October, according to records provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office.”
   2. http://www.kansas.com/news/article1103132.html

http://www.kansas.com/2012/11/17/2572467/few-crimes-committed-by-concealed.html ( .00086%)



I asked you if you can document these folks as less law abiding....

...and so far, you can't.



Try again: how many permit holders are there (it is over 17 million).....and how many of same are found guilty as you have suggested..


Then, divide those guilty by the total number.....see if you can beat the figure I provided, ( .00086%) you dunce.



Shall I wait, of continue on with a happy and fruitful life?

Yes do the math, this is a big increase:


Right-to-carry handgun laws trigger a 13% to 15% increase in violent crime a decade after the typical state adopts them, suggests a new statistical analysis of 33 US states.

Except that study is false.