Left wing Pope calls sexual victims satan

[ding]

Existence is proof. Try studying it.

How is existence proof of an invisible being pulling all the strings?

You would have to study it to understand it. I have already explained it to you dozens of times.

No you haven't. You have nothing that ties existence to an invisible being that nobody can see.

Sure I do. I have our experiences creating things and logic.

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

 

[Taz]

So no scientific proof, just your word. Got it.

Everything around you is proof. You just reject it because there is no proof that you will accept.

You can't tie all your "proof" to an invisible superbeing in another dimension.

If you believe God exists in another dimension then why are you demanding proof?

Why not have some proof? You seem to have a problem with real proof.

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

 

[Taz]

How is existence proof of an invisible being pulling all the strings?

You would have to study it to understand it. I have already explained it to you dozens of times.

No you haven't. You have nothing that ties existence to an invisible being that nobody can see.

Sure I do. I have our experiences creating things and logic.

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

 

[ding]

Everything around you is proof. You just reject it because there is no proof that you will accept.

You can't tie all your "proof" to an invisible superbeing in another dimension.

If you believe God exists in another dimension then why are you demanding proof?

Why not have some proof? You seem to have a problem with real proof.

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

 

[ding]

You would have to study it to understand it. I have already explained it to you dozens of times.

No you haven't. You have nothing that ties existence to an invisible being that nobody can see.

Sure I do. I have our experiences creating things and logic.

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

 

[Taz]

You can't tie all your "proof" to an invisible superbeing in another dimension.

If you believe God exists in another dimension then why are you demanding proof?

Why not have some proof? You seem to have a problem with real proof.

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

 

[Taz]

No you haven't. You have nothing that ties existence to an invisible being that nobody can see.

Sure I do. I have our experiences creating things and logic.

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

 

[ding]

If you believe God exists in another dimension then why are you demanding proof?

Why not have some proof? You seem to have a problem with real proof.

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

What else would you call someone who expects to find evidence from another dimension in this dimension?

Intelligent people know that’s not possible.

 

[ding]

Sure I do. I have our experiences creating things and logic.

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

 

[Taz]

Why not have some proof? You seem to have a problem with real proof.

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

What else would you call someone who expects to find evidence from another dimension in this dimension?

Intelligent people know that’s not possible.

You'd have to find the other dimension first, which you haven't.

 

[Taz]

How does that lead you to an invisible being?

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

 

[ding]

I've explained it to you a dozen times. You tell me what I said.

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

I say it is evidence that can be used to prove the existence of a creator just as our creations are evidence. You'd have to study creation to figure out the rest. So there is way more to it than that. That's the part you can't tell me anything about.

 

[ding]

What proof would you expect from another dimension, Einstein?

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

What else would you call someone who expects to find evidence from another dimension in this dimension?

Intelligent people know that’s not possible.

You'd have to find the other dimension first, which you haven't.

You already acknowledged that God is a being from another dimension, dummy.

Do you even read what you write?

 

[ding]

Taz acknowledging he expects to find evidence that exists in another dimension in this dimension

 

[Taz]

Nothing of consequence.

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

I say it is evidence that can be used to prove the existence of a creator just as our creations are evidence. You'd have to study creation to figure out the rest. So there is way more to it than that. That's the part you can't tell me anything about.

You can't prove a creator with existence or the universe because you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Plus, it makes no sense.

 

[ding]

I didn’t think you could.

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

I say it is evidence that can be used to prove the existence of a creator just as our creations are evidence. You'd have to study creation to figure out the rest. So there is way more to it than that. That's the part you can't tell me anything about.

You can't prove a creator with existence or the universe because you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Plus, it makes no sense.

No. You can't tell me what I have told you about it.

Maybe you have some short term memory loss.

 

[Taz]

Something real, otherwise it's all fartsmoke.

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

What else would you call someone who expects to find evidence from another dimension in this dimension?

Intelligent people know that’s not possible.

You'd have to find the other dimension first, which you haven't.

You already acknowledged that God is a being from another dimension, dummy.

Do you even read what you write?

God would have to be in another dimension because it sure ain't in this one!

 

[Taz]

Because you never gave me anything concrete.

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

I say it is evidence that can be used to prove the existence of a creator just as our creations are evidence. You'd have to study creation to figure out the rest. So there is way more to it than that. That's the part you can't tell me anything about.

You can't prove a creator with existence or the universe because you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Plus, it makes no sense.

No. You can't tell me what I have told you about it.

Maybe you have some short term memory loss.

If it mattered, I'd remember it. Please try again.

 

[ding]

Something from another dimension?

Are you stupid or something?

So you have nothing except name calling. Got it.

What else would you call someone who expects to find evidence from another dimension in this dimension?

Intelligent people know that’s not possible.

You'd have to find the other dimension first, which you haven't.

You already acknowledged that God is a being from another dimension, dummy.

Do you even read what you write?

God would have to be in another dimension because it sure ain't in this one!

And you expect to find direct evidence of a being from another dimension in this dimension, dummy?

 

[ding]

It doesn’t matter what I gave you. It only matters that you can’t tell me what it was.

You say the universe/existence is proof of your god through your own experience and logic. Which isn't any real kind of proof.

I say it is evidence that can be used to prove the existence of a creator just as our creations are evidence. You'd have to study creation to figure out the rest. So there is way more to it than that. That's the part you can't tell me anything about.

You can't prove a creator with existence or the universe because you have no idea what the fuck you're talking about. Plus, it makes no sense.

No. You can't tell me what I have told you about it.

Maybe you have some short term memory loss.

If it mattered, I'd remember it. Please try again.

Why? That would be illogical. What are you stupid?