Orange_Juice
Senior Member
- Jul 24, 2008
- 1,038
- 57
- 48
Rush Limbaugh? Hannity? Are we still talking about Libertarians?
They are, on the domestic side of things, libertarians
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rush Limbaugh? Hannity? Are we still talking about Libertarians?
Neo-Libertarians? I'm getting confused.
They are, on the domestic side of things, libertarians
I'm sorry. I jumped in. what was it "new Anarchists/libertarians"?
I was merely saying substitute neo for new. and yes ?I think there are neo-Libertarians and some Anarchists do appear to be of a libertarian bent or is it the other way around?
too tired to think clearly right now. I gotta get me an almond or two.
ltr
\
d.
Agreement on a few things doesn't make someone a Libertarian.
I never said they were, I said they piggybacked their anti-government message that gained some popularity from them and their ilk, that's all
I have no idea what was meant by "new."
Originally Posted by Kevin_Kennedy:
Yes, it certainly did work. It worked to prolong and worsen the Great Depression by roughly 10 years.
Originally Posted by oj:
At least that's what the new--and I bet short lived--Libertarian/anarchist historians are saying. Doesn't make it true, but that's what those kooks are saying anyway
this was the context
I'm going to have to quote Mike Tyson and say that I doubt it seriously.
About the same level of logic as quoting a Libertarian
I don't understand why they're "new" though.
Sticks and stones may break my bones and so on and so forth.
And holding on to some Utopian anarchist dreams will never save you
That's so true. The Anarchists/libertarians are the new communists. They have an answer to all problems, but its a stupid answer!
And holding on to some Utopian anarchist dreams will never save you