Leave it to the liberal media...

txlonghorn

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2009
3,042
400
48
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Because they believe that will harm him with his base, the religious right.
They believe the right is all the same with exactly the same aims; entirely homogenous....

It was actually 28 years ago when he was only 22, and it was described as being "semi-nude" which I would take to mean maybe in a 'jock-strap.' some kind of a wrap or the like.

Sally Quinn brought this up the other night as her only comment on the Bill O'Reilly show, opening her comments by saying "he's a hunk......"
She was excusing his popularity among women who would vote for him, but of course it was so remote and obscure as to be totally irrelevant.
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Let's put it in perspective....you're dealing with people who's maturity level is that of a junior highschool gossipmonger. They cater to listeners/readers who care nothing about this country or what happens to it as long as they can say "we got ours..fuck you"...so once you see it from this perspective it's actually quite normal for them to make this a news item.
 
Good, teh more they expose themselves the better.

Exactly right, a fact that they miss entirely. This is true of their constant lambasting of Fox News for instance. The average liberal (but not necessarily true of the average Democrat) carries their hatred to such a shrill level that it's an invitation for the open minded person to penetrate the filter, and see what is really there. This hurts them instead of helping their side.
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Because they believe that will harm him with his base, the religious right.
They believe the right is all the same with exactly the same aims; entirely homogenous....

It was actually 28 years ago when he was only 22, and it was described as being "semi-nude" which I would take to mean maybe in a 'jock-strap.' some kind of a wrap or the like.

Sally Quinn brought this up the other night as her only comment on the Bill O'Reilly show, opening her comments by saying "he's a hunk......"
She was excusing his popularity among women who would vote for him, but of course it was so remote and obscure as to be totally irrelevant.

the religious right in massachusetts meets in a phone booth
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Because they believe that will harm him with his base, the religious right.
They believe the right is all the same with exactly the same aims; entirely homogenous....

It was actually 28 years ago when he was only 22, and it was described as being "semi-nude" which I would take to mean maybe in a 'jock-strap.' some kind of a wrap or the like.

Sally Quinn brought this up the other night as her only comment on the Bill O'Reilly show, opening her comments by saying "he's a hunk......"
She was excusing his popularity among women who would vote for him, but of course it was so remote and obscure as to be totally irrelevant.

the religious right in massachusetts meets in a phone booth
Exactly ... which shows how misdirected their effort was to bring up a "beefcake" pose in Cosmo. . :razz:
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

That's the left for you. I've heard the pics described as porno, dirty, etc. by various lib idiots. If they'd really bothered to look though they'd know the pics revealed nothing they wouldn't have seen had he been wearing a Speedo. Actually, less because no Speedo 'bulge' can be seen.
 
Yea and how bout that Liberal Rag Boston Globe posting a Coakley victory on their site eight hours before the polls closed? DOH! The Liberal Media doesn't have much credibility left at this point. I think most common sense thinking Americans understand this.
 
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Let's put it in perspective....you're dealing with people who's maturity level is that of a junior highschool gossipmonger. They cater to listeners/readers who care nothing about this country or what happens to it as long as they can say "we got ours..fuck you"...so once you see it from this perspective it's actually quite normal for them to make this a news item.

Is that the same type of comment we heard from YOU and your ilk when Obama was splashed all over the media swimming and gasp shirtless? That then led to photos of him sitting in the Oval Office without a tie and his sleeves rolled up, and the gasping from the right that "no president has ever been that casual, blah blah blah."

Hypocrisy is [always] thy middle name...
 
Good, teh more they expose themselves the better.

Exactly right, a fact that they miss entirely. This is true of their constant lambasting of Fox News for instance. The average liberal (but not necessarily true of the average Democrat) carries their hatred to such a shrill level that it's an invitation for the open minded person to penetrate the filter, and see what is really there. This hurts them instead of helping their side.

Of course the "shrillness" of FoxNews would have nothing to do with that reaction. Nah...
 
Because they believe that will harm him with his base, the religious right.
They believe the right is all the same with exactly the same aims; entirely homogenous....

It was actually 28 years ago when he was only 22, and it was described as being "semi-nude" which I would take to mean maybe in a 'jock-strap.' some kind of a wrap or the like.

Sally Quinn brought this up the other night as her only comment on the Bill O'Reilly show, opening her comments by saying "he's a hunk......"
She was excusing his popularity among women who would vote for him, but of course it was so remote and obscure as to be totally irrelevant.

the religious right in massachusetts meets in a phone booth
Exactly ... which shows how misdirected their effort was to bring up a "beefcake" pose in Cosmo. . :razz:

These days, such side shows for political posturing are passe' -- who gives a shit, except of course the people who think they somehow represent what's also in someone's head. Who really gave a shit that Michelle "touched" the Queen of England, or that Barack Obama appeared to be "blowing" to the president of China? Why YOU folks did. Surprise surprise. See how this works, AH? You folks have the memory span of gnats.

Yikes! That was some typo. It should have read "bowing." I could blame it on the fact that my little finger and the one next to it got slammed in my car trunk on Sunday, but I won't. [Chuckling...]
 
Last edited:
To focus on BS like Scott Brown's magazine spread from 20 years ago in Cosmo...

How perfectly irrelevant and blatantly desperate. The liberal media is it's own worst enemy.

Let's put it in perspective....you're dealing with people who's maturity level is that of a junior highschool gossipmonger. They cater to listeners/readers who care nothing about this country or what happens to it as long as they can say "we got ours..fuck you"...so once you see it from this perspective it's actually quite normal for them to make this a news item.

Is that the same type of comment we heard from YOU and your ilk when Obama was splashed all over the media swimming and gasp shirtless? That then led to photos of him sitting in the Oval Office without a tie and his sleeves rolled up, and the gasping from the right that "no president has ever been that casual, blah blah blah."

Hypocrisy is [always] thy middle name...

Nope! And we now know that all it takes to dupe you and YOUR ILK is slick talk, a six-pack set of abs and some terrorists as friends
 
Let's put it in perspective....you're dealing with people who's maturity level is that of a junior highschool gossipmonger. They cater to listeners/readers who care nothing about this country or what happens to it as long as they can say "we got ours..fuck you"...so once you see it from this perspective it's actually quite normal for them to make this a news item.

Is that the same type of comment we heard from YOU and your ilk when Obama was splashed all over the media swimming and gasp shirtless? That then led to photos of him sitting in the Oval Office without a tie and his sleeves rolled up, and the gasping from the right that "no president has ever been that casual, blah blah blah."

Hypocrisy is [always] thy middle name...

Nope! And we now know that all it takes to dupe you and YOUR ILK is slick talk, a six-pack set of abs and some terrorists as friends
And you made her point in the process.:clap2:

We focus on magazine spreads, you guys spread lies about Obama's birth certificate, and say Obama is a terrorist or his friends are terrorist. I especially like the one that Obama is gay.
 
Is that the same type of comment we heard from YOU and your ilk when Obama was splashed all over the media swimming and gasp shirtless? That then led to photos of him sitting in the Oval Office without a tie and his sleeves rolled up, and the gasping from the right that "no president has ever been that casual, blah blah blah."

Hypocrisy is [always] thy middle name...

Nope! And we now know that all it takes to dupe you and YOUR ILK is slick talk, a six-pack set of abs and some terrorists as friends
And you made her point in the process.:clap2:

We focus on magazine spreads, you guys spread lies about Obama's birth certificate, and say Obama is a terrorist or his friends are terrorist. I especially like the one that Obama is gay.
I never said anything about Obama's birth certificate!!! Don't lump me into that fucking crowd!!!
You are known by the company you keep....what group was Ayers a member of and what was their claim to infamy back in the 60's/70's?
 
Because the day has 24 hours and the week seven days, it must be filled with something. The wonder is given all that time many still believe the unbelievable. I am not sure what to make of that. Is media only there to put the proletariats to sleep? It could be that Marx was born too early, had he viewed TV today, he would have given up on Communism, he would have realized that with American Idol, 24, CSI, and Cold Case etc etc his ideas had no chance. His readers are asleep.
 
Last edited:
I love the Boston Globe posting a Coakley victory on their site eight hours before the polls closed. DOH! The Liberal Media loses more & more credibility every day. Shame on you Boston Globe.
 
Is that the same type of comment we heard from YOU and your ilk when Obama was splashed all over the media swimming and gasp shirtless? That then led to photos of him sitting in the Oval Office without a tie and his sleeves rolled up, and the gasping from the right that "no president has ever been that casual, blah blah blah."

Hypocrisy is [always] thy middle name...

Nope! And we now know that all it takes to dupe you and YOUR ILK is slick talk, a six-pack set of abs and some terrorists as friends
And you made her point in the process.:clap2:

We focus on magazine spreads, you guys spread lies about Obama's birth certificate, and say Obama is a terrorist or his friends are terrorist. I especially like the one that Obama is gay.

Interesting way you hide the truths in plain sight among the lies, Lu. You bad. And don't label everyone on the right as 'you guys'. You're smarter than that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top