Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science

[Mr. Peepers]

Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Interesting... I had a hunch that this was being corporate-funded.

 

[edthecynic]

DENIERGATE! haha

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What Climate Science?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"The scheme includes spending $100,000 for spreading the message in K-12 schools that "the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain..."

OMFG!!!!!

$100,000

Not a typo!

One hundred thousand dollars!

 

[konradv]

"The scheme includes spending $100,000 for spreading the message in K-12 schools that "the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain..."

OMFG!!!!!

$100,000

Not a typo!

One hundred thousand dollars!

That's your defense, "just a little bit of propaganda"?!?!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Interesting... I had a hunch that this was being corporate-funded.

Libertarian thinktank keeps prominent sceptics on its payroll and relies on millions in funding from carbon industry, papers suggest

OMG! The carbon industry!

But Anthony Watts, a weathercaster who runs one of the most prominent anti-science blogs, Watts Up With That?

Anti-science?

The papers indicate that discrediting established climate science remains a core mission of the organisation

Well, when the "established climate science" is a lie, that's a good thing.

 

[Leweman]

Didn't even read the article but at best it would mean you can't believe anybody on either side of the climate change argument. So now what?

 

[Claudette]

Shit.

I thought all those big whig scientist touting Climate Change had already destroyed 150 years worth of true weather data??

At least thats what their e-mails said.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Keep in mind that this propaganda is coming from the Bolshevik British rag, "The Guardian", which is the same bird cage liner that called for the assassination of then-President G.W. Bush several years ago.

The British version of "Pravda" strikes again!

 

[Meister]

"The scheme includes spending $100,000 for spreading the message in K-12 schools that "the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain..."

OMFG!!!!!

$100,000

Not a typo!

One hundred thousand dollars!

Was it tax payers money?

 

[DiamondDave]

"The scheme includes spending $100,000 for spreading the message in K-12 schools that "the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain..."

OMFG!!!!!

$100,000

Not a typo!

One hundred thousand dollars!

That's your defense, "just a little bit of propaganda"?!?!

Propaganda??

The topic of man made climate change is controversial and uncertain...

Blow it out your ass, winger

 

[konradv]

"The scheme includes spending $100,000 for spreading the message in K-12 schools that "the topic of climate change is controversial and uncertain..."

OMFG!!!!!

$100,000

Not a typo!

One hundred thousand dollars!

That's your defense, "just a little bit of propaganda"?!?!

Propaganda??

The topic of man made climate change is controversial and uncertain...

Blow it out your ass, winger

That's what it would be called, if they were AGW proponents. So, we can "blow" together, K?

 

[DiamondDave]

So forced teaching of man-made global warming is ok whether it is funded by the state education system or whatever other source... even if it is completely unproven, controversial, and highly debated...

But a countering point of view is supplied and funded cheaply by an outside group and it is not OK??

Fuck off

 

[Leweman]

Why do liberals fight so hard for man made climate it change when it doesn't exist? It's called nature morons.

 

[skookerasbil]

Climate change..............lmbo.............nobody cares.

Oh.....and how much time did Obama spend on discussing climate change in his recent SOTU speech?


Ummm...........zero. Nobody cares except the 20% or so on the k00k left.


Just go over to the Environment Forum on here...........about 5 or 6 regulars show up in there to promote the bomb throwing and the sceptics who show up in there pwn them continuously.

 

[konradv]

Why do liberals fight so hard for man made climate it change when it doesn't exist? It's called nature morons.

Can you prove it? Logically, if something increases that absorbs energy, eventually that increase in retained energy will lead to increased temps. Your turn.

 

[BlindBoo]

Keep in mind that this propaganda is coming from the Bolshevik British rag, "The Guardian", which is the same bird cage liner that called for the assassination of then-President G.W. Bush several years ago.

The British version of "Pravda" strikes again!

Charlie Brooker apologises for any offence caused by his comments relating to President Bush in his TV column, Screen Burn. The views expressed in this column are not those of the Guardian. Although flippant and tasteless, his closing comments were intended as an ironic joke, not as a call to action - an intention he believed regular readers of his humorous column would understand. He deplores violence of any kind."

The article has now been removed from the Guardian Unlimited website

Screen Burn, The Guide | Culture | The Guardian

 

[skookerasbil]

Why do liberals fight so hard for man made climate it change when it doesn't exist? It's called nature morons.

Can you prove it? Logically, if something increases that absorbs energy, eventually that increase in retained energy will lead to increased temps. Your turn.

Geez.......does this dope ^^ have the political IQ of a handball, or what?

The whole point is the true believers CANT PROVE SHIT..........not the other way around, which is why as the recent Pew poll illustrates.........nobody cares about this shit........

 

[bripat9643]

Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science | Environment | guardian.co.uk

Interesting... I had a hunch that this was being corporate-funded.

ROFL! and I had a hunch that all the warmist nutburger cult members are government funded.

Here's a clue for you: the source of the funding doesn't prove or disprove an argument or the evidence presented. The belief that it does is a classic libturd fallacy.

There is no great secret exposed by your "leaker."

I really laughed when I read the part where they claimed their mole was an "insider," not a "hacker" like the guy who released the Climategate emails.

Warmist cult members are a laugh a minute.

 

[konradv]

Why do liberals fight so hard for man made climate it change when it doesn't exist? It's called nature morons.

Can you prove it? Logically, if something increases that absorbs energy, eventually that increase in retained energy will lead to increased temps. Your turn.

Geez.......does this dope ^^ have the political IQ of a handball, or what?

The whole point is the true believers CANT PROVE SHIT..........not the other way around, which is why as the recent Pew poll illustrates.........nobody cares about this shit.

Not talking politics, that's the deniers' milieu. I'm talking science, something you wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole, preferring polls and misinterpreting stolen emails.