Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH THIS.....The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.The bull shit runs deep with this one...Flynn plead guilty to lying about the FBI about a meeting between him and the RUSSIAN ambassador. A meeting he did as a private citizen discussing sanction relief with the RUSSIANS. That sounds pretty collusionist. Pretty sure I just invented a word there but the point stands.For nothing to do with collusion with Russia or Trump
Mueller has indicted dozens of people, including several high ranking people in the Trump campaign and administration. Which is more then ever was put forth on Benghazi that has ZERO indictments. Yelling fake doesn't make that go away./----/ Benghazi actually happened. Trump Russia Collusion is fake.
Flynn was acting for the PRESIDENT ELECT at that time.. He did nothing wrong under the law.... You wanna cry some and try lying again?
I don't think being the potential National Security Advisor is authorized. It's kind of like when you claim the Secretary of State can't have a private e-mail server.
And as rightwinger pointed out, you don't know what they really got on him considering he did plead GUILTY. Innocent people typically don't say they committed crimes.
If Trump has nothing to hide, what is he afraid of?/----/ "Why won’t Trump testify under oath?" For the same reason your attorney would tell you not to testify under oath in a witch hunt. Too big of a chance of being caught in a process crime.Well, if that is the caseIn an editorial published on RealClearPolitics this morning, Jonathan Turley, a nationally recognized legal scholar and law professor at George Washington University, says that Mueller still has not produced any evidence of Trump-Russian collusion. Here's an excerpt:
After 14 months of investigation (and for the second time in a formal indictment), the Justice Department has stated that it is not alleging any knowing collusion between Trump campaign officials or associates and the Russians. Back in February, Mueller handed down his major indictment of 13 Russians for actively interfering with the 2016 election by spreading false information. Both Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein expressly noted that the evidence involved “unwitting” communications with Russians adopting false identities. This indictment shows that same pattern of clearly concealed identities in seeking to hack and distribute email information from the Democratic campaign and its associates.
When I noted at the time of the February indictment that it was strikingly silent on evidence of collusion, some insisted that the indictment did not cover the hacking operation and that Mueller was likely waiting to indict Trump officials colluding on the theft and distribution of the emails. We are still waiting. While the indictment speaks of both a reporter and a Trump campaign associate unwittingly communicating with the Russians, the indictment does not allege knowing collusion. That does not mean that no one colluded on some level, but after 14 months we have yet to see compelling evidence of collusion by Trump or his campaign. (Ignore the spin — still no evidence of Trump collusion)
If you read the whole article, you'll see that Turley is not completely siding with Trump on the matter. He disagrees with Trump's label of "witch hunt" and believes that in many respects Mueller's investigation is serving a legitimate purpose. But Turley also makes the point that so far Mueller has produced zero evidence that Trump or his top aides colluded with the Russians.
Why won’t Trump testify under oath?
Why won’t Trump just explain why his key people were meeting with the Russians.......you don’t send key people to discuss Russian adoptions
What did Flynn and company trade for lighter sentences?
Much is still unknown
Clinton testified, Nixon testified, Reagan testified
So it comes down to "yes it's illegal but no prosecutor would actually try for conviction?" Why does that seem familiar? Comey was nailed to the wall for this kind of hairsplitting. Not that I disagree, the Logan act would be a stretch but it serves perfectly to make the point. chances are Flynn did commit crimes, most likely in his lobbying work and he plead guilty in exchange testimony. It's how every prosecutor works and illustrates perfectly how Mueller's mandate works./---- It's not so cut and dry: How the Logan Act Does — and Doesn't — WorkThe Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.The bull shit runs deep with this one...Flynn plead guilty to lying about the FBI about a meeting between him and the RUSSIAN ambassador. A meeting he did as a private citizen discussing sanction relief with the RUSSIANS. That sounds pretty collusionist. Pretty sure I just invented a word there but the point stands.For nothing to do with collusion with Russia or Trump
Mueller has indicted dozens of people, including several high ranking people in the Trump campaign and administration. Which is more then ever was put forth on Benghazi that has ZERO indictments. Yelling fake doesn't make that go away.
Flynn was acting for the PRESIDENT ELECT at that time.. He did nothing wrong under the law.... You wanna cry some and try lying again?
I don't think being the potential National Security Advisor is authorized. It's kind of like when you claim the Secretary of State can't have a private e-mail server.
And as rightwinger pointed out, you don't know what they really got on him considering he did plead GUILTY. Innocent people typically don't say they committed crimes.
How the Logan Act Works (or Doesn't)
A couple major problems arise when it comes to enforcing the Logan Act these days. One is free speech. It's hard to keep a U.S. citizen, whether authorized by the government to act in an official capacity or not, from exercising it.
"The Supreme Court has basically relegated content-based restrictions, or restrictions on what a person can say, to the dustbin of permissible legislation because it equates them with censorship," University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck tells the Atlantic.
Another sticking point is that, the way politics works today, it's virtually impossible to keep everybody away from the policy party. U.S. foreign policy, after all, doesn't happen in a vacuum. A lot of people have a lot of varying interests, be they economic, political, religious or whatever.
Sure, keep on trying. Skating around the fact that you are thinking going after the GRU is a witch hunt. And claiming the entire AMERICAN justice department is involved in some ridiculous conspiracy. Glad you make so clear were your loyalty is.NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH THIS.....The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.The bull shit runs deep with this one...Flynn plead guilty to lying about the FBI about a meeting between him and the RUSSIAN ambassador. A meeting he did as a private citizen discussing sanction relief with the RUSSIANS. That sounds pretty collusionist. Pretty sure I just invented a word there but the point stands.For nothing to do with collusion with Russia or Trump
Mueller has indicted dozens of people, including several high ranking people in the Trump campaign and administration. Which is more then ever was put forth on Benghazi that has ZERO indictments. Yelling fake doesn't make that go away.
Flynn was acting for the PRESIDENT ELECT at that time.. He did nothing wrong under the law.... You wanna cry some and try lying again?
I don't think being the potential National Security Advisor is authorized. It's kind of like when you claim the Secretary of State can't have a private e-mail server.
And as rightwinger pointed out, you don't know what they really got on him considering he did plead GUILTY. Innocent people typically don't say they committed crimes.
Gawd you look stupid.. Again the judge has told them to produce all evidence and escopitory evidence they have.. They have not produced as of Friday... Guess whats going to happen on Monday when they fail to produce? It gets tossed with prejudice....
Then the real fun begins as we charge Mueller and his cabal with prosecutorial misconduct...
Going after the GRU is a diversion from the witchhunt, moron. Going after the Trump administration is the witchhunt.Sure, keep on trying. Skating around the fact that you are thinking going after the GRU is a witch hunt. And claiming the entire AMERICAN justice department is involved in some ridiculous conspiracy. Glad you make so clear were your loyalty is.NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH THIS.....The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.The bull shit runs deep with this one...Flynn plead guilty to lying about the FBI about a meeting between him and the RUSSIAN ambassador. A meeting he did as a private citizen discussing sanction relief with the RUSSIANS. That sounds pretty collusionist. Pretty sure I just invented a word there but the point stands.For nothing to do with collusion with Russia or Trump
Flynn was acting for the PRESIDENT ELECT at that time.. He did nothing wrong under the law.... You wanna cry some and try lying again?
I don't think being the potential National Security Advisor is authorized. It's kind of like when you claim the Secretary of State can't have a private e-mail server.
And as rightwinger pointed out, you don't know what they really got on him considering he did plead GUILTY. Innocent people typically don't say they committed crimes.
Gawd you look stupid.. Again the judge has told them to produce all evidence and escopitory evidence they have.. They have not produced as of Friday... Guess whats going to happen on Monday when they fail to produce? It gets tossed with prejudice....
Then the real fun begins as we charge Mueller and his cabal with prosecutorial misconduct...
