Laws and tyranny

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Si modo, Aug 3, 2012.

  1. Vidi
    Offline

    Vidi CDZ prohibited

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,869
    Thanks Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Ratings:
    +343
    Actually no. It is his chosen name on this board. It is either true or false, but not open to interpretation, thus objective.

    Now if one were to same that someones name was fitting to their personality, THAT would be subjective as it is a matter of opinion.
     
  2. FA_Q2
    Offline

    FA_Q2 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    15,807
    Thanks Received:
    2,319
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +5,356
    I conceded the right as given was subjective. What I was saying is that the right is subjective but the laws that support that right are objective to the right. See my example.
     
  3. Vidi
    Offline

    Vidi CDZ prohibited

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,869
    Thanks Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Ratings:
    +343
    Fair enough. I can accept that condition as stated.
     
  4. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,301
    Thanks Received:
    5,694
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,763
    When fascism comes to America, it will be carrying a protest sign and screeching, "It's for the children!!"
     
  5. ItsjustmeIthink
    Offline

    ItsjustmeIthink Social Capitalist

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2012
    Messages:
    531
    Thanks Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    'MERICA!
    Ratings:
    +58

    Ehhh, I think I get it.I don't think i understood right til you phrased it like that.That is, If you're saying that the killer has no right to intervene in an otherwise natural cycle of life.Liike, if a person was left to their on volition then they would either die from killing themselves or an age-related death etc etc etc; but an indivdual killing said person would be a disruption in an otherwise natural life cycle? Similar to how government regulations can interfere with capitalism's otherwise natural "boom&bust" cycle? The context of the other post seemed, to me, like you were saying that when someone kills another person, then that person is having their life stolen from them
    Was thinking "to take one's life" was a play on words.
    .
    ..
    ...
    ....
    Sorry.
     
  6. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    43,208
    Thanks Received:
    6,584
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Fairfax, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +10,583
    To the first part, I agree.

    To the second part, effectively the government IS seizing that business. It's using its authority to cease selling the product that IS its business. And, as one of our principles of this country is the assumption of innocence, the business has to spend money to keep the government from allowing it to operate when no law was broken?

    That's pretty fucked up - many civil rights violations going on.
     
  7. Vidi
    Offline

    Vidi CDZ prohibited

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    2,869
    Thanks Received:
    342
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Minneapolis, MN
    Ratings:
    +343
    As the validity of the Hypothesis is based the objective/subjective condition, semantics are absolutely necessary.
     
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2012
  8. Si modo
    Offline

    Si modo Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    43,208
    Thanks Received:
    6,584
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Fairfax, Virginia
    Ratings:
    +10,583
    No it's not. Just stop.

    I've already explicitly described exactly what the point of my OP is a few times now.

    You are going way off topic at this point.

    Please take it to another thread.
     
  9. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,851
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,867
    :) Depends on the Person and the circumstances.
     
  10. Intense
    Offline

    Intense Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    44,909
    Thanks Received:
    5,851
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +5,867
    Just a reminder. The object inside the CDZ is constructive argument, void of put downs, insults, threats, general flames and baiting. Yeah, we all need to adjust. Bottom line, the more we stick to that, the less we will be removing Posts. There have been some really positive changes here. :)
     

Share This Page