Yep...
Mark Levin's Landmark Legal Foundationhas filed a detailed Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court) Brief in support of the State of Arizona and its recently enacted law requiring suspected illegal aliens to produce proof of their legal immigration status, in accorda.
The Document <pdf file
The Section that Deals with Mexico, and their intrusion (Allowed Brief by the Courts) is rather interesting.
Lanmark states that it is against Diplomatic Protocol through 'exertion of Diplomatic pressure on the Court' I think is right on target.
Mexico should tend to their own affairs. What I see is Mexico being pissed that the Arizona Law will cut off the funnel of money gotten illegally back to Mexico.
Now try the reverse of this IN Mexico? Ain't happening. You'll land in JAIL being an illegal for a couple of years.
I wish Mark and Landmark Legal well in this endeavour. It's about time more rose up to this invasion. Because when you get right down to it?
That's what it is.
Mark Levin's Landmark Legal Foundationhas filed a detailed Amicus Curiae (Friend of the Court) Brief in support of the State of Arizona and its recently enacted law requiring suspected illegal aliens to produce proof of their legal immigration status, in accorda.
The Document <pdf file
The Section that Deals with Mexico, and their intrusion (Allowed Brief by the Courts) is rather interesting.
Lanmark states that it is against Diplomatic Protocol through 'exertion of Diplomatic pressure on the Court' I think is right on target.
Mexico should tend to their own affairs. What I see is Mexico being pissed that the Arizona Law will cut off the funnel of money gotten illegally back to Mexico.
Now try the reverse of this IN Mexico? Ain't happening. You'll land in JAIL being an illegal for a couple of years.
I wish Mark and Landmark Legal well in this endeavour. It's about time more rose up to this invasion. Because when you get right down to it?
That's what it is.