L.A. Times: Violent Movies Don’t Cause Violence, but Guns Do

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wehrwolfen, Feb 16, 2013.

  1. Wehrwolfen
    Offline

    Wehrwolfen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,752
    Thanks Received:
    338
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +338
    L.A. Times: Violent Movies Don’t Cause Violence, but Guns Do​


    Understanding the fractured mind of a gun-ban fetishist.​



    by Howard Nemerov
    February 16, 2013

    Betsy Sharkey of the Los Angeles Times penned an op/ed claiming that violent movies don’t make people violent, but instead are a “positive force.” Her diatribe highlights the mental disturbance that’s the result of hoplophobia. Here’s some analysis of her points.

    “A good deal of movie violence is designed as a way for us to experience it vicariously.”​

    Why does she need to “vicariously” experience violence? If she were writing about XXX-rated movies, we would call it pornography, which purportedly offers viewers vicarious stimulation, too. According to a Psychology Today author: “pornography not only arouses, it tutors our imagination.” In this way, pornography “shapes male expectations” and “splits men’s consciousness,” destroying their ability to relate to real women.

    Now we’re supposed to believe that violence-pornography doesn’t affect people’s minds, while sex-pornography does. Welcome to the split consciousness at the LA Times.

    Here’s more evidence of a “split consciousness.” Sharkey acknowledges violence “has been with us since the dawn of mankind.” Violence preceded guns, too. Imagine a woman with a stick facing off with a large male. Now replace that stick with a pistol. It’s no wonder that rape increased in Britain and Australia after they enacted massive gun bans.

    Another point of Sharkey’s is just as revealing: The thought of filmmakers making their movies “less gruesome” is, to her, “the scariest proposition of all.”

    Why shouldn’t this be considered addiction? Addicts live in fear of losing access to their drug(s) of choice, upon which they’ve come to depend. The Medical Dictionary notes: “Using drugs repeatedly over time changes brain structure and function in fundamental and long-lasting ways.” [emphasis added]

    Evidence suggests that those long-lasting brain changes are responsible for the distortions of cognitive and emotional functioning that characterize addicts, particularly the compulsion to use drugs.

    Why shouldn’t watching violent movies cause similar results? This concept is widely accepted by researchers. Here’s the conclusion from a group of authors representing the Universities of Arizona, California, Iowa State, Michigan, North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin:

    Research on violent television and films, video games, and music reveals unequivocal evidence that media violence increases the likelihood of aggressive and violent behavior in both immediate and long-term contexts.

    I’m not a psychologist, nor am I diagnosing anybody here. But responsible journalists should always reflect on how to best serve society, considering the power we’ve been given to influence public discourse.

    In that vein, we must ponder: If an author is addicted to the vicarious thrills she experiences from watching violence-pornography, then her brain function may have altered to the point that whatever she avers as truth must be examined. Furthermore, if such mental illness exists, then it’s socially irresponsible for the Times to continue allowing her to publicly praise violence-pornography as a “positive force,” because such enabling behavior not only damages the author’s chances of recovery, but it fosters an environment wherein more get led into addiction. If a major media organization says it’s okay, such rationalization can convince an impressionable person balanced between conscience and social pressure.

    The comment by “fhk22553” was particularly noteworthy:

    “Isn’t it amazing that we are asked to believe that a stationary billboard with simply a picture of an ugly (Joe) Camel on it , will make a young adult want to run out and buy a carton of cigarettes , yet , somehow that same young adult will be totally un-affected by watching a 90 minute film with a dozen people either blown-up , shot , or sliced and diced …. How does that work ? ….Is it magic , or just another case of Liberal Logic-101 …. What’s your best guess ?” [sic]


    [Excerpt]

    Read more:
    The PJ Tatler » L.A. Times: Violent Movies Don?t Cause Violence, but Guns Do
     
  2. TheSeventhTiger
    Offline

    TheSeventhTiger BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,132
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Naples,Marco Area
    Ratings:
    +180
    How about a 35yr old women scorned on PMS week? will she need a license to walk the streets or dine at taco bell?
     
  3. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    8,657
    Thanks Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,492
    Maybe we need background checks for movie tickets.
     
  4. TheSeventhTiger
    Offline

    TheSeventhTiger BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,132
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Naples,Marco Area
    Ratings:
    +180
    I wonder when someone will mention the sale of nail guns. people do get killed by them, I remember a story of a guy getting shot by one. he was getting his hair cut while construction was going on in the next store. a nail went thru the wall into him. I think he died. what a way to go.
     
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist "Remain Calm People!" Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    20,901
    Thanks Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Location:
    Trinity Site
    Ratings:
    +5,094
    Hollywood spends Billions on Movies, TV shows and Commercials because they know no one watches them.


    Wait what? :confused:
     
  6. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,412
    Thanks Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +450
    People cause gun violence.

    There.
     
  7. TheSeventhTiger
    Offline

    TheSeventhTiger BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2013
    Messages:
    3,132
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Naples,Marco Area
    Ratings:
    +180
    90% of commercials suck, they should show them to the worst criminals in jail just to torture them. especially those geico and progressive commercials.
     
  8. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist "Remain Calm People!" Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    20,901
    Thanks Received:
    4,438
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Location:
    Trinity Site
    Ratings:
    +5,094
    A Marketing Guy will tell you those are good commercials just because we remember them.

    It's like that Ad Busters PSA from a while ago:

     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 18, 2014
  9. Samson
    Offline

    Samson Póg Mo Thóin Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    27,306
    Thanks Received:
    3,738
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    A Higher Plain
    Ratings:
    +4,135
    pornography, which purportedly offers viewers vicarious stimulation, too. According to a Psychology Today author: “pornography not only arouses, it tutors our imagination.” In this way, pornography “shapes male expectations” and “splits men’s consciousness,” destroying their ability to relate to real women

    :eusa_eh:

    The REAL problem is women do not watch ENOUGH porn.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,412
    Thanks Received:
    444
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +450
    Ohhh, ok.

    Off to xvideos~
     

Share This Page