Koch Bros. vs. Libertarians (Cato takeover?)

Synthaholic

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2010
71,522
51,308
3,605
*
v7d8W.png



Cato Goes to War

The Koch brothers have launched an extraordinary campaign to take control of America’s most respected libertarian think tank. Will they destroy it?



On Friday afternoon, as the Washington offices of the Cato Institute were emptying out for the weekend, the libertarian think tank’s president sent an e-mail to all staff. The subject was the Koch brothers crisis.

“Catoites,” wrote Ed Crane, “You are all probably aware by now of the unfortunate development with Charles and David Koch. They are in the process of trying to take over the Cato Institute and, in my opinion, reduce it to a partisan adjunct to Americans for Prosperity, the activist GOP group they control.”

His fellow Catoites were waiting for this. On Thursday morning, the Washington Post published news of a lawsuit the Kochs had filed against the 35-year-old libertarian think tank, claiming that they could buy the controlling shares held by the late co-founder and chairman William Niskanen. A “Save Cato” page materialized on Facebook; Cato staffers, on their public pages, were telling friends to join. On Friday, before he sent out the e-mail, Crane summoned some of his top scholars for a special briefing on the Koch crisis. Attendees described it as a “war meeting,” with Crane pledging to stay on and fight the lawsuit as long as it could be fought. This was basically what Crane would say in his all-Cato e-mail.

“Cato is the gold standard of libertarian organizations around the world,” wrote Crane. “We are respected and admired for our commitment to libertarian principles, integrity, independence and non-partisanship. That respect encompasses traditional liberals and conservatives. That would all end with a Koch takeover, despite Charles Koch's protestations to the contrary.”

How did this happen, and why should anyone outside of the libertarian sphere care about it? The first question has a complicated answer. The second question answers itself.

Charles and David Koch have been putting some of their hard-won oil wealth into libertarian causes since the 1970s. A lot of the money has gone to theoretical, academic research—Cato, the Mercatus Institute, internship programs for college students. Charles Koch had helped to found Cato in 1977, but in 1991, he bolted; the think tank wasn’t producing his kind of results. David joined Cato as Charles left, becoming a minority partner, present but not really policing the think tank’s work.


More at the link.
 
Last edited:
Cato is only the most respected "libertarian" think tank among non-libertarians. Regardless it's a rather interesting situation. The court documents show how Murray Rothbard, who went on to create the Ludwig von Mises Institute with Lew Rockwell, was an original shareholder in Cato and was ultimately purged by Ed Crane and the Kochs. It's alleged by some who were close to Rothbard that his shares were illegally taken from him, and, if true, must now pass to Lew Rockwell.
 
We don't need a "washington based think tank" anyway.
 
Cato is bought and paid for by the Kochs, pretty always has been, especially since the purge of Rothbard. It has sought to paint an acceptable-to-the-inside-the-beltway-crowd face on Libertarianism and has done a disservice to that spectrum of political thought.
 
With the Paul movement reaching about 20% of the electorate, and probably more, I think it's hit a point of critical mass where any of these so-called think tanks that are really just meant to hijack and manipulate political thought, have become irrelevant.

We don't need Cato to do our thinking for us.
 
Huffington used to be a conservative blog. Breitbart even worked there. Who took over Huffington while we weren't looking? Personally I don't give a crap but it shows the difference between the right and the left. What's the problem? Can't the Kotch brothers and Cato iron it out without George Soros and his tax exempt Media Matters and the ignorant biased left wing, with much too much time on their hands, getting involved?
 
Control freaks looking to buy control of conservative politics. Of course they could be easily stymied if tea party supporters would just refuse to allow them, not going to happen.
 
Control freaks looking to buy control of conservative politics. Of course they could be easily stymied if tea party supporters would just refuse to allow them, not going to happen.

Donnie, you're out of your element. You don't have a clue what you're saying.
 
Control freaks looking to buy control of conservative politics. Of course they could be easily stymied if tea party supporters would just refuse to allow them, not going to happen.
The Kochs own the tea party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top