Kobes' X rated trial

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by dilloduck, Aug 29, 2004.

  1. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    I thought for sure this guy would walk and still may but the news thats eeks out has made me wonder. Sounds like the victim is going to claim that she said NO to a particular "thing" Kobe did to her face. Rape may have to be redefined here.
     
  2. krisy
    Offline

    krisy Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,919
    Thanks Received:
    112
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +112
    I can't say I have been following this,but it's had not to know what is going on when you watch the news. Fromthe stuff I hear,I thought it would maybe be a difficult case to win. I guess she had other DNA on her underwear and that seemed really bad for the prosecution. I mean,who has sex with another guy after they have been raped? Some expert was on the other day and said that some victims have sex with another man after being raped. Doesn't make sense to me and I think she has some questions to answer. Don't get me wrong though,I definitley can't sya I think he is innocent...not sure what I think.
     
  3. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    It sounds like the prosecution will try to say that the woman said NO to only a certain part of the sex act. Now that's really splittin hairs !---(ooops) :halo:
     
  4. DKSuddeth
    Offline

    DKSuddeth Senior Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2003
    Messages:
    5,175
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    North Texas
    Ratings:
    +62
    well, no really does mean no. unless we're going to try to redefine no in this case. does consent to one act mean consent to any act? If thats the case, look out girls. :fifty:
     
  5. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403

    Exactly--if this what the case turns out to be, it might actually be interesting.

    " I agree to abc but xyz is a no go " Does the right to say no include the responsibilty to precisely define what "no" includes ?
     
  6. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    Not under the criminal law, it isn't.
     
  7. dmp
    Offline

    dmp Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    13,088
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Ratings:
    +741
    Women have all the power over men. A woman can decide 'after' the fact she didn't want it, and claim rape. A woman can moan..."yes..YES....no!! Yess!" and claim rape because during her activity she used 'no'.

    (shrug). Kobe is a victim in this... :)
     
  8. Moi
    Offline

    Moi Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,859
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    The ONLY GOOD place
    Ratings:
    +11
    You have a very incorrect interpretation of the law. But I have the perfect solution though.

    These powerless men should learn to keep it in their pants. That seems to me the best protection against false accusations. Especially for a married man.
     
  9. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    are you recommending that the poor females go without? :wank:
     
  10. Moi
    Offline

    Moi Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,859
    Thanks Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    The ONLY GOOD place
    Ratings:
    +11
    Not at all. I'm recommending that married men have sex with their wives after receiving consent. That unmarried men have sex with whatever women chooses to consent. That men stop using force and threats to get what they want.

    Powerless means being forced to have a penis stuck either in your mouth, vagina or anus. Powerless means going on a date with someone and being violated by a penis or other object, through the use of force, into your mouth, vagina or anus.

    If I seem particularly vulgar my apologies. But powerless isn't the rare occurrence of being accused of rape when you've not done so- that's what the legal system is for. One in four women, some 20 million if you count the national crime statistics, have either been raped or have had it attempted on them. I doubt, no actually I know, one in four men haven't been falsely accused.

    Powerless is having such violations performed on you when you have no ability to stop them- no subsequent legal action can adjudicate that away.
     

Share This Page