Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A lot of people will argue that the US constitution extends rights to anyone in our country, which is a big reason Gitmo exists.
Bad guys are expected to be bad guys. Good guys are expected to be good guys. Things get pretty fuzzy when the good guys do bad things.
This is code for "The good guys should not harm the bad guys, it ain't fair" HahahahahaA lot of people will argue that the US constitution extends rights to anyone in our country, which is a big reason Gitmo exists.
Bad guys are expected to be bad guys. Good guys are expected to be good guys. Things get pretty fuzzy when the good guys do bad things.
No, it's code for we shouldn't become like terrorists.This is code for "The good guys should not harm the bad guys, it ain't fair" Hahahahaha
Terrorists have violated International law by torturing and murdering civilians.
Actually I think we are showing considerable restraint with all the ones who were actually picked up On battle fields in Iraq and Afghanistan, who were taking up arms against us, and not wearing uniforms.
The GC is very clear on that, We could have shot every one of them if we wanted. Before we ever sent them to Gitmo or anywhere else.
Maybe I am reading the GC wrong but it sure seems to say that to me.
Criminals should be tried by a legal court, not by general rant. Blair, for instance, is to my mind a war criminal, but he must be considered innocent until tried. The American authorities have very evidently violated international law by torturing and murdering civilians, and the zionist 'authorities' make it their normal custom - but until they can be brought before a court it is difficult to pinpoint individual guilt. I can't for the life of me see, though, why we should take the word of these apparent criminals that other people are to be treated as criminals without trial.
Are you for real?
What do you think the Germans did with French resistance fighters they captured Brainiac?What uniform were you proposing they should have worn, and what was the uniform worn by the French Resistance?
Where does the GC say you need evidence?All populations have the right to use arms against criminals waging aggressive war, surely? And how much evidence do we have that the people illegally locked up were even bearing arms?
Sure and that is why I said Actually picked up on a battlefield. I guess you just skipped over that part.In many cases, people just seem to have been grabbed to make up numbers.
Problem being we don't know if they were picked up on the battlefield taking up arms against us...IMO, if we don't KNOW then we are no better than them. A nation of laws is an important concept.Actually I think we are showing considerable restraint with all the ones who were actually picked up On battle fields in Iraq and Afghanistan, who were taking up arms against us, and not wearing uniforms.
The GC is very clear on that, We could have shot every one of them if we wanted. Before we ever sent them to Gitmo or anywhere else.
Maybe I am reading the GC wrong but it sure seems to say that to me.
A nation of laws is an important concept.
Originally Posted by Ravi
A nation of laws is an important concept.
It is far more important than a concept. It basically seperates us from the unsavory barbarians we are battling. That distinction has been rather clouded for the past few years.
Criminals should be tried by a legal court, not by general rant. Blair, for instance, is to my mind a war criminal, but he must be considered innocent until tried. The American authorities have very evidently violated international law by torturing and murdering civilians, and the zionist 'authorities' make it their normal custom - but until they can be brought before a court it is difficult to pinpoint individual guilt. I can't for the life of me see, though, why we should take the word of these apparent criminals that other people are to be treated as criminals without trial.
If you kept up with that thread you'd have discovered that not only are cities not required to enforce federal immigration law, but also they aren't allowed to in some cases. Only recently has Congress passed legislation to allow them to assist the Feds, but it does not compel them to...a different case all together.This from someone who does not care about the lack of enforcement of Immigration laws.
What do you think the Germans did with French resistance fighters they captured Brainiac?
Where does the GC say you need evidence?
Sure and that is why I said Actually picked up on a battlefield. I guess you just skipped over that part.
If you kept up with that thread you'd have discovered that not only are cities not required to enforce federal immigration law, but also they aren't allowed to in some cases. Only recently has Congress passed legislation to allow them to assist the Feds, but it does not compel them to...a different case all together.
No - it was not what I meant. Lots of people are in your concentration camp simply because someone with power didn't like them. If you doubt this, see them charged before a proper court or release them.
