Kick Him In The Balls

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Notice the evolution of print to television in the following anecdotes. The first one took place before television:

truman2.jpg

When President Harry Truman picked up his "Washington Post" early on December 6, 1950, to read a review of his daughter Margaret Truman's singing performance, he was livid. Though conceding that Miss Truman was "extremely attractive," Paul Hume, the "Post's" music critic, stated bluntly that "Miss Truman cannot sing very well" and "has not improved" over the years. The president wrote the following letter to the 34-year old Hume, whom he compared to the columnist Westbrook Pegler ("a rat," in Truman's view).

In the good old days, President Truman, the last good Democrat, meant every word in his written response:

Mr Hume:

I've just read your lousy review of Margaret's concert. I've come to the conclusion that you are an "eight ulcer man on four ulcer pay."

It seems to me that you are a frustrated old man who wishes he could have been successful. When you write such poppy-cock as was in the back section of the paper you work for it shows conclusively that you're off the beam and at least four of your ulcers are at work.

Some day I hope to meet you. When that happens you'll need a new nose, a lot of beefsteak for black eyes, and perhaps a supporter below!

Pegler, a gutter snipe, is a gentleman alongside you. I hope you'll accept that statement as a worse insult than a reflection on your ancestry.

H.S.T.​


The second anecdote took place in television’s pimply-face teenage years:

Before politically incorrect speech became a crime, Left-leaning journalists went bonkers when Spiro T. Agnew called a reporter a fat Jap. Spiro T. was already vice president; so talking heads could not do more than piss and moan about Agnew’s humor aimed at a journalist.

The third anectidite took place after television became Godzilla eating those candidates TV objects to:

The media crucified George Allan because he referred to S. R. Sidarth as macaca. It was harmless, but fair play, because Sidarth was engaging in video tracking.




The final anecdote is The Donald daring to make fun of Saint Megyn:



Bottom line: Television’s media mouths are angry because they no longer have the influence to bring down a candidate that insults somebody with a single word, let alone a paragraph. The Donald gave them enough material to bring down George Washington, yet electronic mouths cannot topple him.

My point: Trump refusing to crawl off with his tail between his legs has talking heads foaming at the mouth. Not because of anything Trump said or stands for, but because they see the media’s might to crown the Republican candidate slipping away.

Let’s all pray that Trump does not go all soft and soggy when he finally believes he has a real chance of getting the nominating —— and winning the general election. Nothing would be more painful than to see The Donald playing nice with the people who would do anything to bury him.
 
The man is a complete moron, IMO. :D He's nothing more than a celebrity. He stands for getting more votes for Hilary! Lol. He's a complete disaster for the Republican party. The cracks are already showing.
 
The man is a complete moron, IMO. :D He's nothing more than a celebrity. He stands for getting more votes for Hilary! Lol.
To ChrisL: Is there anybody on the political scene who cannot get more votes than Gruppenführer Clinton?
He's a complete disaster for the Republican party. The cracks are already showing.
To ChrisL: You have that backwards. The Republican party has been a disaster since they nominated Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. Bush 1 & 2 were not much better. Trump winning as a Republican will keep the party on life support for as long as he governs as a true conservative who flat refuses to rollover for one iota of the Democrat party’s Socialist ideology.

I assume you are getting your opinion of Trump from the media. Let me point out that the cracks in the media are chasms. Rachel Alexander is the most recent critic to cite the decline of print journalism:


An Insider’s Look Behind the Mainstream Media’s Crumbling Facade of Power
Rachel Alexander
Sep 14, 2015

Rachel Alexander - An Insider’s Look Behind the Mainstream Media’s Crumbling Facade of Power

Print has always been about advertising dollars. Television more so because there is a helluva lot more money in TV than there ever was in print. Note that people purchase newspapers and magazines, while television’s entire source of revenue comes from tax deductible advertising dollars. That should tell you who they work for.

By comparison, the best-known print journalists never came close to the astronomical salaries paid to on-camera journalists-propagandists.

To me, deciding which one is more contemptible bounces back and forth between journalists and politicians. Unfortunately, television journalists just happen to be ahead of politicians in the minds of too many Americans these days. A free people should hold both in contempt. Remember that the media knew what the Chicago sewer rat was when he was a state senator, but they helped elect him twice. In light of the things their choice did to the country, which group is the most contemptible? Journalists or politicians.

Finally, I hope that I am not giving you the impression that I prefer politicians over journalists because I cheer for Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. I do so because either one is better than the Republicans the media is pushing, and they might actually defend the country.
 
The man is a complete moron, IMO. :D He's nothing more than a celebrity. He stands for getting more votes for Hilary! Lol.
To ChrisL: Is there anybody on the political scene who cannot get more votes than Gruppenführer Clinton?
He's a complete disaster for the Republican party. The cracks are already showing.
To ChrisL: You have that backwards. The Republican party has been a disaster since they nominated Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. Bush 1 & 2 were not much better. Trump winning as a Republican will keep the party on life support for as long as he governs as a true conservative who flat refuses to rollover for one iota of the Democrat party’s Socialist ideology.

I assume you are getting your opinion of Trump from the media. Let me point out that the cracks in the media are chasms. Rachel Alexander is the most recent critic to cite the decline of print journalism:


An Insider’s Look Behind the Mainstream Media’s Crumbling Facade of Power
Rachel Alexander
Sep 14, 2015

Rachel Alexander - An Insider’s Look Behind the Mainstream Media’s Crumbling Facade of Power

Print has always been about advertising dollars. Television more so because there is a helluva lot more money in TV than there ever was in print. Note that people purchase newspapers and magazines, while television’s entire source of revenue comes from tax deductible advertising dollars. That should tell you who they work for.

By comparison, the best-known print journalists never came close to the astronomical salaries paid to on-camera journalists-propagandists.

To me, deciding which one is more contemptible bounces back and forth between journalists and politicians. Unfortunately, television journalists just happen to be ahead of politicians in the minds of too many Americans these days. A free people should hold both in contempt. Remember that the media knew what the Chicago sewer rat was when he was a state senator, but they helped elect him twice. In light of the things their choice did to the country, which group is the most contemptible? Journalists or politicians.

Finally, I hope that I am not giving you the impression that I prefer politicians over journalists because I cheer for Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. I do so because either one is better than the Republicans the media is pushing, and they might actually defend the country.

You assume wrong. I get my impressions from my own observations and his actions and words.
 

Forum List

Back
Top