Keystone pipeline update.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by grunt11b, Feb 4, 2012.

  1. grunt11b
    Offline

    grunt11b VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    4,649
    Thanks Received:
    500
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    In Reality
    Ratings:
    +501
    Not sure if it's been posted, if so just merge please. It might be all for not, but at least it will get democrats actions on record during the middle of this campaign season. Either they want to create jobs, or they want to demogogue it, their jobs will be on the line depending on their choice.
    Republicans Prepare For Next Round In Keystone Pipeline Fight | Fox News
     
  2. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    You mean the.....

    [​IMG] . [​IMG] . [​IMG] . [​IMG] . [​IMG]

    [​IMG] . [​IMG] . [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,221
    Thanks Received:
    2,043
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,846
    Jobs are a positive factor I still don't know why environmentalists WANT 1 million barrels of oil in sloshing around in a tanker tossed on waves with possible crew errors or equipment failure pouring out destroying 100,000s of wildlife, 1,000s of miles of ocean every day!

    Why do they think a pipeline carrying ONLY 325 barrels in one mile of pipe at a time
    would be harmful?
    Can any one say EXXON VALDEZ???
     
  5. Ed Spacer
    Offline

    Ed Spacer BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,986
    Thanks Received:
    208
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    georgia
    Ratings:
    +208
    Who cares about the goddamned wildlife,jobs and resources here more important,environmentalists suck dick.
     
  6. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,221
    Thanks Received:
    2,043
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,846
    MY point was simple...
    If environmentalists so concerned about 325 barrels of oil spilling in ONE mile of pipe wouldn't you think that they would be MORE concerned about 1 million barrels spilling because the pipeline wasn't built and the oil shipped to China???
     
  7. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    Hey.....to-each, his-own......whatever gets you thru-the-night.

    :eusa_whistle:
     
  8. Mr. Shaman
    Offline

    Mr. Shaman Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2010
    Messages:
    23,892
    Thanks Received:
    817
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +819
    There are no spills, now!

    How 'bout we (just) let Canada figure-it-out.

    This Nation has no obligation to make Life more-convenient for the oil-boys in Texas....and, they have no Divine Right to all the oil in Canada.​
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2012
  9. Conservative
    Offline

    Conservative Type 40

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2011
    Messages:
    17,082
    Thanks Received:
    2,026
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +2,030
    [​IMG]
     
  10. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,221
    Thanks Received:
    2,043
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,846
    DUH!!!
    So idiots block a pipeline that at the most spill 325 barrels in one mile so as to
    ship 1 million barrels in ONE tanker each day!
    RIGHT NOW which if existed would spill more oil?
    I mean is it THAT difficult to admit that 1 million barrel spill WILL be worse then
    a 325 BARREL spill?
    Because that's the fundamental point here.. YOU can't even agree that there will be MORE risk over a larger area with a 1 million oil tanker (Even with Exxon Valdez experience)?

    AND Canada WILL solve a problem THAT will be our problem if EXXON Valez is duplicated! There is a much greater chance that will happen then the physical impossibility of 1 million barrels spilling out of one mile of pipe!

    I mean this is such a classic illustration that you are so totally OFF base defending
    a one million barrel per day tanker against a 325 barrel pipeline??

    YOU are solid proof of how detached from reality people like you have become!
     

Share This Page