Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Exactly.
Calling everything I post a logical fallacy isn't an argument. It's a cop-out.
One, two, three logical fallacies.
Exactly.
Calling everything I post a logical fallacy isn't an argument. It's a cop-out.
What argument do you think I'm making? Other than the fact that the OP is illogical, and that what you are saying is illogical? So yes, pointing out that damn near everything you are saying constitutes a fallacy is indeed an argument. Thanks for playing, though.
When the Valdez spill was from 257,000 to 750,000 barrels.
The accident occurred 22 years ago and in the USA no other accident has occurred.
Libertarians hold that neither State nor Fed government should have any say in environmental matters??? So if I want to dump toxic waste down the streets, that's fine???
WTF? I'm thinking I must be misunderstanding your meaning on the part in bold above.
One, two, three logical fallacies.
You really didn't address what I said. You might as well admit you lost while you're behind.
Yes I did. You're babbling on illogically. That's all the addressing needed or deserved. It's amazing that you think illogical arguments deserve being treated like rational arguments.
You aren't making any arguments. You're simply applying an inaccurate pejorative label to any criticism of your claims.
When are you going to describe all these "alternatives" to the pipeline you keep mentioning?
Libertarians hold that neither State nor Fed government should have any say in environmental matters??? So if I want to dump toxic waste down the streets, that's fine???
WTF? I'm thinking I must be misunderstanding your meaning on the part in bold above.
No, that's a crime. Someone owns the property, and dumping toxic waste on someone's property is the worst kind of vandalism. It would also be considered reckless endangerment.
How much more do the Citizens of the United States have to endure to keep the Robber Barons of the energy sector filthy rich?
Wars? Corrupted Environment? Corrupted Political System?
Enough already. We need to use our resources to come up with alternatives..not exploit the old tech.
It isn't 'old tech'. The technology for producing improves all the time, making it more efficient and yes, CLEANER. It is the cheapest to produce and thus cheapest to consume most efficient form of energy currently available.
Nice strawman.
GOP & Libertarians say the power should be in the hands of the state. The governor of Nebraska vehemently opposed it going through his state. So Yes or No: Should his views be ignored? Should the issue be delayed until a consensus is reached with the state?
Or is it screw the power or views of the state, if the GOP wants to invoke federal power to get their way?
There was no strawman and you know it. You said Obama is respecting the wishes of the Republicans. No he isn't and he never has. Obama is a statist and fears giving power to the states. He isn't respecting the concerns of Nebraska or any other state. He is using the State Department to block the pipeline for political purposes. He is anti-oil and anti-business. He keeps begging Congress to pass his "jobs bill", yet his own Speaker of the Senate is the one who keeps blocking it. Obama could bring good paying, long term jobs to Americans with the swipe of his pen if he would allow offshore drilling, drilling in ANWR and building the pipeline......and ease our dependence on foreign oil at the same time. The question is why isn't he?
Hmmm. Apparently you're having a hard time grasping what I write because you're wrong on virtually everything here. Let me try to make this simple (although the evidence seems to be that you will dodge anyway) and see if you are capable of direct answers on a point by point basis.
1. Do Republicans and Libertarians hold that states should have more power?
2. Do they hold they should regulate issues such as environment, rather than the Fed?
3. If the governor of Nebraska says his state doesn't want the pipeline going through, should the Fed exercise its' power to over-ride those wishes?
We'll just start with those three simple questions as i doubt you'll answer even those, directly.
One, two, three logical fallacies.
You really didn't address what I said. You might as well admit you lost while you're behind.
You aren't making any arguments. You're simply applying an inaccurate pejorative label to any criticism of your claims.
When are you going to describe all these "alternatives" to the pipeline you keep mentioning?
Pejorative? If pointing out the fact that your arguments are flawed is "pejorative" than this country is really in crisis. Your arguments lack logical merit. That's not my fault.
Fine. So is building a pipeline through Nebraska (which include thousands of miles of private property) okay if there are citizens who say "Not through MY private property, thank you!".
As that is the case in Nebraska, to such an extent that it would take eminent domain to overcome, it seems your position is that it should definitely not be built.
If you spent half as much time attempting a modicum of coherence in your posts as you do spending time doing goofy font size and color shit to them people might actually be able to have a conversation with you.
Comparing a pipeline to a tanker is invalid.
The title is clear! Which is worse: 1 million barrels spill or 3,000 barrels ?Comparing a pipeline to a tanker is invalid.
If you spent half as much time attempting a modicum of coherence in your posts as you do spending time doing goofy font size and color shit to them people might actually be able to have a conversation with you.
that's why I put him on my ignore list. I'm tired of having my screen cluttered with his shit.
Try it. You'll experience a new found sense of peace coming over you.
The title is clear! Which is worse: 1 million barrels spill or 3,000 barrels ?Comparing a pipeline to a tanker is invalid.
I mean why is there ANY question but I would rather have 3,000 barrels spilling on DRY LAND then ONE MILLION in the ocean!
