Kennedy rips Santorum 3 years later

Bonnie said:
I think if he were to run in NJ he'd have a pretty good shot sadly!!

I'll have to cede that one to you, Bonnie. Kennedy probably would have a pretty good shot at serving in the Senate from any one of those liberal East and West Coast states. They are pretty hung up on the Kennedy mystique, but the Democrat Party today is not the same party that John Kennedy served as president, and Teddy is not John by a long shot. The only thing they share politically is the Kennedy name.
 
Adam's Apple said:
I'll have to cede that one to you, Bonnie. Kennedy probably would have a pretty good shot at serving in the Senate from any one of those liberal East and West Coast states. They are pretty hung up on the Kennedy mystique, but the Democrat Party today is not the same party that John Kennedy served as president, and Teddy is not John by a long shot. The only thing they share politically is the Kennedy name.

I was thinking how both his brothers had so much more class and would never have behaved like he has over the years.
 
musicman said:
Well, thank goodness you've arrived, then. Please, by all means, save us from our folly. But, you might want to CHECK THE SPELLING ON YOUR NAME FIRST.





My God, man - look at his voting record! His entire life has been an ode to the advancement of leftist tyranny! If Kennedy can't be called a liberal, who can??!!





I imagine it is - to those infected with the sickness of liberalism. The elimination of any and all restraints on human behavior, the breakdown of the family, the scuttling of education, the hateful and murderous lie known as the sexual revolution (along with its offspring: a national policy on abortion - with its accompanying slaughter of 40 million innocents, the legitimization of dangerous and destructive behaviors like homosexuality, and the generalized cheapening of human dignity and life), and the insidious, nonstop attacks on the very concept of self-government, are symptomatic of a disease brought about by liberalism - a disease which will ultimately lay waste to this nation unless the ideology is finally and completely put to death.





And, as we're doing. So, what's your problem?





Right. I gotcha. Conservatives should take the high road, and sit in stoic silence while liberals - who still enjoy a commanding position of dominance in the arena of information and culture - use that pulpit to disseminate an endless stream of self-serving lies and distortion. Brilliant, Ploi! What would have been your strategy on D-Day - throw rocks at the Germans?






Please provide a link citing ONE such instance. You can't, because President Bush never did any such thing.





You are woefully misinformed, my friend. Take a stroll past the career graveyard, and ponder the rotting corpses of Dan Rather and Terry McAuliffe. This is what comes of presenting baldfaced lies as facts. The liberals don't hold an absolute monopoly on information any more; it's a new day in America!

________________________________________________________________

....and the guru's silence is deafening.....
 
GotZoom said:
....and the guru's silence is deafening.....

A word to the wise: don't mess with Musicman. He's got brains and is in command of a considerable inventory of facts. When he gets done taking you apart, you'll feel like a ribbon shred.
 
ploitical-guru said:
People, people you are all missing the point here. No matter how much of a drunken hic kennedy might be (he doesn't deserve to call himself a liberal) tocall a society "sick" and blaim liberals for it is quite offensive. While this country has freedom of speech people have the right to voice agitation at something somebody else said, as kennedy did. The truth of the matter is that while it may have been 3 years ago it still happened and kennedy has every right to be pissed off tue or false (and he believes it to be false) stop jumping down liberals' throats, if liberals are really always jumping down conservatives' throats as conservatives claim then you are only stooping to a liberal's level. From what I have seen conservatives are the ones alwayys digging up ancient dirt from the past. After all in the 2004 election Bush was the first to sling mud (at Kerry's military record for example) and he did this long before Kerry pointed out anything about Bush's past such as that he went AWOL, is a proven ex cocaine-addict (We can only hope about the ex part) ex-alcoholic (same thing about the ex) and that he bankrupted nine companies before he ever lead one to be successful.


Liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is the point. Not missed at all. Rick Santorum hit the nail on the head when he blamed liberalism for creating a culture of sleeze and degeneracy in our society. Liberalism has for years been pushing "free speech" for all the pornographers and child molestors while at the same time it seeks to stifle the expression of decency and religious morals. Liberalism promotes degeneracy in the form of free love, homosexuality, "family planning" through abortion, excusing people for their sick, bad, and borderline behaviors as they lower the standards of decency everywhere, etc.

As I doubt you will be able to answer musicman coherently after he sliced and diced your post apart, I'd just suggest you go buy and read the book by Michael Savage called -you guessed it- "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" and maybe you can educate yourself about the destructive nature of today's liberalism - of which Ted Kennedy is such a "shining" example.
 
Adam's Apple said:
A word to the wise: don't mess with Musicman. He's got brains and is in command of a considerable inventory of facts. When he gets done taking you apart, you'll feel like a ribbon shred.

:beer:

High praise indeed, sir - coming from such a wise and decent bloke as yourself. Thank you!
 
musicman said:
Well, thank goodness you've arrived, then. Please, by all means, save us from our folly. But, you might want to CHECK THE SPELLING ON YOUR NAME FIRST.

Oh no, maybe it's not a misspelling, and he's really a member of the PLO. It would explain some of the sentiments.

And btw, Guru, President Bush did not attack Kerry's military record. The SwiftBoat Vets did (and I'm glad they did). As I recall, Bush steered clear of even mentioning Kerry's service.
 
Bonnie said:
It's going to be Forester aginst Corzine.........Some great choice.. a liberal.... or a liberal :wtf:

Yuck. I didnt like forester. Didnt know much about anything he stood for but his ads just irritated me.
 
Abbey Normal said:
And btw, Guru, President Bush did not attack Kerry's military record. The SwiftBoat Vets did (and I'm glad they did). As I recall, Bush steered clear of even mentioning Kerry's service.

Very true. President Bush wanted to focus on the issue. It's Kerry who made his service an issue. And then those who served with him told the truth about what happened. Heaven forbid the people who served with him tell the truth.

I can't believe people are still going to be going on about Bush being AWOL. He honorably served. Get over it. He served in the national guard. Had enough points for a full discharge early. Its a non issue. Get over it.
 
Avatar4321 said:
What was wrong about what he said though? Nothing. Kennedy is just shocked that someone said it. Catholic Priests are part of the culture of the land they are in. It's a fact. and when the culture is sick it affects everyone.

But I am not sure Kennedy is sober yet, or atleast whether he has any cognitive skills when he is sober anyway. Santurom didn't say the people of Boston were the problem. He said that cultural and political liberalism is the problem and it's effected the people in Boston. According to Santurom the people of Boston are the victims. They are the victims of liberals like Kennedy and Kerry.

So in reality it's stuck up self righteous politicians like Kenney who are without morals and corrupt to the core that are corrupting the people. And I dont know anyone who could repeatedly get elected Senator after killing a woman and not be corrupt.

Ted Kennedy is possibley the most corrupt politician in the senate next to Hildabeast Clinton, Anybody remember july 19 1969... need I say more. Ted Kennedy is slime but I have to object to what Santorum said on the premise that individuals are responsible for their own actions, we cant blame murder on tv or sex scandals on playboy, we have to hold the individuals responsible otherwise the idea of law and order fades away. I also dont like it when people generalize about a certain area, not everbody in those areas has a degenerate lifestyle and there are actually (although they are rare) people in that area (massachusets) that dont like Kerry and Kennedy. Besides "cultural liberalism" is just a fancy way of saying gay people.
 
xandy123 said:
Ted Kennedy is possibley the most corrupt politician in the senate next to Hildabeast Clinton, Anybody remember july 19 1969... need I say more. Ted Kennedy is slime but I have to object to what Santorum said on the premise that individuals are responsible for their own actions, we cant blame murder on tv or sex scandals on playboy, we have to hold the individuals responsible otherwise the idea of law and order fades away. I also dont like it when people generalize about a certain area, not everbody in those areas has a degenerate lifestyle and there are actually (although they are rare) people in that area (massachusets) that dont like Kerry and Kennedy. Besides "cultural liberalism" is just a fancy way of saying gay people.

I agre with most of what you said. People are responsible for their own actions and I don't really agree with Santorum on this as a whole, here comes the but....For Kennedy to be singling out this comment which was essentially Mr Santorum's opinion adds up to nothing more than a blatant attempt at grabbing the spotlight in coming to Boston's rescue which is just self serving. I think we agree on that point. There is a bit of truth to what Santorum was poiting out in that the media for the most part espouses moral relativism for everyone but whomever they don't agree with that week. We are all in part influenced by our culture some more than others. Priests should be held to a higher standard which is where I part company with Mr Santorum, but for the media to pick and choose who they think should be held responsible for bad behavior is just as opportunistic as Kenedy.
 
ScreamingEagle said:
Liberalism is a mental disorder.

That is the point. Not missed at all. Rick Santorum hit the nail on the head when he blamed liberalism for creating a culture of sleeze and degeneracy in our society. Liberalism has for years been pushing "free speech" for all the pornographers and child molestors while at the same time it seeks to stifle the expression of decency and religious morals. Liberalism promotes degeneracy in the form of free love, homosexuality, "family planning" through abortion, excusing people for their sick, bad, and borderline behaviors as they lower the standards of decency everywhere, etc.

As I doubt you will be able to answer musicman coherently after he sliced and diced your post apart, I'd just suggest you go buy and read the book by Michael Savage called -you guessed it- "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder" and maybe you can educate yourself about the destructive nature of today's liberalism - of which Ted Kennedy is such a "shining" example.

Tsk tsk ....trying to introduce the truth into a thread with Kennedy's name in it .......
 

Forum List

Back
Top