Kavanaugh/Ford Opinon threads from Saturday, Sept 23, 2018

[ColonelAngus]

Pubs should NOT have delayed the vote.

They will regret it.

It just gives more time for the lying left to trot out more liars.

They want to win. They have no rules.

Wake the fuck up.

Guaranteed, they will manufacture someone else with an equally ambiguous and unverifiable claim that Kavanaugh once looked at them weird and made them feel uncomfortable.

 

[LoneLaugher]

It's a shit show. That is exactly what "conservatives" said they wanted.

Now they whine like little bitches.

 

[LoneLaugher]

You shouldn't.

But you should want to know if what she says is true.

You don't.

Look inward.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They probably dug up a new actress to make new allegations since Ford’s has fallen apart.

I sense it's nothing to do with Ford.....some other shit conjured up at the 11th hour!

They probably found an overdue library book at his childhood home from the school he attended.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

There still is no solid commitment from the Ford camp.

Will she make the hearing, or duck out in the last minute with the Democrats demanding more time and accommodation?

What say you?

This is 100% political. Consider- Feinstein holds the letter for days, Then it is anonymous, then a few ys letter Ford comes out, then she wants to talk. That was nearly 2 weeks ago! If you got a story to tell, tell it. So why is she now balking at talking? 2 possible reasons-one, she doesn’t want to face tough questions about her time at Holton Arms, where she along with her classmates partied their asses off, or two (the one I believe) she is being handled/coached by the Dems so they can drag this on as long as possible going into the midterms. It’s how Dems work, and they are very very good at it.

 

[skye]

Democrats just won't be happy until anarchy reigns in the US.

It definitely looks that way.

DemonRats want total chaos ....and sadly they are getting it!

 

[aaronleland]

She will not. Lying there is just a smidgen more serious than a kid lying to his mama about his homework being done.

I haven't even paid much attention to this whole Kavanaugh affair, but from what I've read neither side has much evidence to support their claims or refute the other's. They can both lie all they want.

Of the people she said were there, all have come forward and made statements under oath saying it didn't happen.

seems pretty convincing to me

From what I have read all of the people she said were there say they "don't recall" the particular party 36 years ago. I'm only 34, and I don't recall parties from 20 years ago. Neither side seems to have a leg to stand on.

 

[deannalw]

It sure would be interesting to watch. The GOP will have to tread very lightly, risking being accused of attacking her.

I'd be very surprised if the person questioning her for the GOP were not a woman.

I'd pole vault over chairs, tables and stern men in suits to punch her in the throat.

 

[Avatar4321]

She will not. Lying there is just a smidgen more serious than a kid lying to his mama about his homework being done.

I haven't even paid much attention to this whole Kavanaugh affair, but from what I've read neither side has much evidence to support their claims or refute the other's. They can both lie all they want.

Of the people she said were there, all have come forward and made statements under oath saying it didn't happen.

seems pretty convincing to me

From what I have read all of the people she said were there say they "don't recall" the particular party 36 years ago. I'm only 34, and I don't recall parties from 20 years ago. Neither side seems to have a leg to stand on.

The latest one says she has never met kavanaugh or been to a party with him.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

....

then every single SC nominee in the future will be subjected to deliberately false allegations.

The standard has to be some form of proof.

Allegations with no evidence cannot stop nominations of any kind, otherwise they will stop all....

Relax. He’s going to get the job, it’s turned into political gamesmanship by the Dems. They want to drag this story as long as they can towards the midterms. Nothing has ever been more obvious.

 

[BlackFlag]

Twitter

Kavanaugh to Give Senate Calendars From 1982 to Back Up Denial

Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh has calendars from the summer of 1982 that he plans to hand over to the Senate Judiciary Committee that do not show a party consistent with the description of his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, according to someone working for his confirmation.

The calendars do not disprove Dr. Blasey’s allegations, Judge Kavanaugh’s team acknowledged. He could have attended a party that he did not list. But his team will argue to the senators that the calendars provide no corroboration for her account of a small gathering at a house where he allegedly pinned her to a bed and tried to remove her clothing.

The calendars show, according to the person working for his confirmation, that he was out of town much of the summer at the beach or away with his parents. When he was at home, the calendars list his basketball games, movie outings, football workouts and college interviews. A few parties are mentioned but include names of friends other than those identified by Dr. Blasey.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...

I mean some of you subversives believe her letter, so you should surely his calanders of what happened EACH DAY from 1982 onward!!!!

Has anyone actually seen this letter besides partisan jackass, senile, China spy employing Cal. Senator?

Lol his high school calendars?

I’m more interested to hear what this second of his victims that’s coming out soon has to say.

You mean they actually FOUND a second whore to say something....Must have paid this one 6 figures, cause Balsy and her 54 JOHNS didn't cost The DNC anything near that...ROTFLMFAO!!!

It’s not rare for a rapist to have multiple victims. Don’t be surprised if a 3rd and 4th step forward.

 

[DOTR]

Liberals confuse the terms “accuser “ and “sainted victim”.

 

[Kondor3]

....

then every single SC nominee in the future will be subjected to deliberately false allegations.

The standard has to be some form of proof.

Allegations with no evidence cannot stop nominations of any kind, otherwise they will stop all....

Blasey-Ford passed an initial polygraph exam on the subject.

Let's have the FBI itself administer the exam to both.

Best two-out-of-three if the subject doesn't like the result.

Then pass the results to the Senate Judiciary Committee as additional matter for consideration in contemplating the whole.

 

[Tilly]

There still is no solid commitment from the Ford camp.

Will she make the hearing, or duck out in the last minute with the Democrats demanding more time and accommodation?

What say you?

Billy billy billy ....I wish you’d included a DK becuase this is probably the only time I’d opt for it

I’m slightly leaning toward no show, but only slightly
.
On the other hand she might turn up if only because not to do so only makes her look more like a liar than she already does.

 

[debbiedowner]

Sure I believe a high school student 36 years still has a calendar, if he kept one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There still is no solid commitment from the Ford camp.

Will she make the hearing, or duck out in the last minute with the Democrats demanding more time and accommodation?

What say you?

I hope she waits until Wednesday night and asks for extension. And then I hope she keeps doing that until about the year 2021.

 

[Tilly]

It sure would be interesting to watch. The GOP will have to tread very lightly, risking being accused of attacking her.

I'd be very surprised if the person questioning her for the GOP were not a woman.

They offered her women specialised in this area to do the questioning, I think she refused.
Optics are everything (in the absence of evidence anyway)

 

[aaronleland]

She will not. Lying there is just a smidgen more serious than a kid lying to his mama about his homework being done.

I haven't even paid much attention to this whole Kavanaugh affair, but from what I've read neither side has much evidence to support their claims or refute the other's. They can both lie all they want.

Of the people she said were there, all have come forward and made statements under oath saying it didn't happen.

seems pretty convincing to me

From what I have read all of the people she said were there say they "don't recall" the particular party 36 years ago. I'm only 34, and I don't recall parties from 20 years ago. Neither side seems to have a leg to stand on.

The latest one says she has never met kavanaugh or been to a party with him.

This one night, just a few years out of high school, I was at this bar in my area. I had high school classmates calling me by name left and right. I couldn't tell you any of their names, and I had only seen them a few years earlier. I may have met Kavanaugh for all I fucking know.

 

[WillowTree]

She will show up on Morning Joe before she will show up to testify!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She will show up on Morning Joe before she will show up to testify!

Good, i hope she does the entire talk show circuit.