Kathianne...look what I found!

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Powerman, May 3, 2006.

  1. Powerman
    Offline

    Powerman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,499
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +39
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I may be wrong, but I'm assuming you are harkening back to the idea of mother or baby in utero?
    http://www.usmessageboard.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27451&page=2&pp=15&highlight=mother+vatican'
    If so, I believe I made it clear then that the church's teachings to the best of my knowledge were for the mother to make the choice, if able. I don't see all that much new, just AP trying to show that Church is still in middle ages, nothing new there at all.

    Interesting isn't it, that suddenly Benedict is the 'enlightened one?'
     
  3. Powerman
    Offline

    Powerman Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,499
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +39
    My point here is that they are talking about the doctrine of double effect as influencing their decision.

    You said that this was just some nonsense that Thomas wrote a long time ago that the Church didn't pay any attention to.
     

Share This Page