Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like

[S.J.]

This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.

That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.

 

[HUGGY]

If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.

If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.

Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com

After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.

That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.

You are mentally a cripple. For that I am truly sorry for the people around you. Here in the USA mental disease is recognized but seldom does it rise to any level of relief of guilt. You are still going to be held responsible for what YOU do and say. The involvement you seem to claim as righteous in other people's children's sexual development is really NONE of your concern. You are simply a pervert. You are just as principled as Bill O'Reilly, meaning that you are scum and truly have no such principles.

What I find astonishing is that you can claim any righteousness at all with a straight face. Just like O'Reilly you talk about who is trying to take advantage of the young teens and still have the gall to fantasize about their sexuality.

There are already laws prohibiting what you claim to be so incensed about...got it?...now stay away from young teens.

 

[S.J.]

Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.

That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.

You are mentally a cripple. For that I am truly sorry for the people around you. Here in the USA mental disease is recognized but seldom does it rise to any level of relief of guilt. You are still going to be held responsible for what YOU do and say. The involvement you seem to claim as righteous in other people's children's sexual development is really NONE of your concern. You are simply a pervert. You are just as principled as Bill O'Reilly, meaning that you are scum and truly have no such principles.

What I find astonishing is that you can claim any righteousness at all with a straight face. Just like O'Reilly you talk about who is trying to take advantage of the young teens and still have the gall to fantasize about their sexuality.

There are already laws prohibiting what you claim to be so incensed about...got it?...now stay away from young teens.

Hey fucktard, YOU'RE the one who thinks teachers should be able to show children pornography in the name of "education" and you accuse ME of being a pervert??? Fuck you, you slanderous POS.

 

[I.P.Freely]

I think a bill keeping porn out of schools is a no brainer.

And yet...it doesn't specify porn. Is Huckleberry Finn porn? How about The Cay? Is that porn? Or The Giver?

And don't forget the classic novel of an underage brothel during wartime:

God forbid teenager girls read about her period or a boy she liked. That's some radical shit, for right-wingers that is.

Failed 6th grade English class for refusing to read and do book report on that BORING shit...skipped school the day they forced us to watch that dumb ass movie.

and you have been an anti semite ever since, so no damage done to you missing school

 

[Preacher]

I think a bill keeping porn out of schools is a no brainer.

And yet...it doesn't specify porn. Is Huckleberry Finn porn? How about The Cay? Is that porn? Or The Giver?

And don't forget the classic novel of an underage brothel during wartime:

God forbid teenager girls read about her period or a boy she liked. That's some radical shit, for right-wingers that is.

Failed 6th grade English class for refusing to read and do book report on that BORING shit...skipped school the day they forced us to watch that dumb ass movie.

and you have been an anti semite ever since, so no damage done to you missing school

Its precisely WHY I am a "anti semite" it oughta be Jew hater because Arabs are semites as well and I don't hate them.

 

[HUGGY]

If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.

You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.

I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.

What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.

I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.

That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.

You are mentally a cripple. For that I am truly sorry for the people around you. Here in the USA mental disease is recognized but seldom does it rise to any level of relief of guilt. You are still going to be held responsible for what YOU do and say. The involvement you seem to claim as righteous in other people's children's sexual development is really NONE of your concern. You are simply a pervert. You are just as principled as Bill O'Reilly, meaning that you are scum and truly have no such principles.

What I find astonishing is that you can claim any righteousness at all with a straight face. Just like O'Reilly you talk about who is trying to take advantage of the young teens and still have the gall to fantasize about their sexuality.

There are already laws prohibiting what you claim to be so incensed about...got it?...now stay away from young teens.

Hey fucktard, YOU'RE the one who thinks teachers should be able to show children pornography in the name of "education" and you accuse ME of being a pervert??? Fuck you, you slanderous POS.

No, you are the liar and the pervert. If you believe I have made a post where I think teachers should be able to show children porn then by all means post a link to it. Until you have done THAT you are simply someone that talks out of your asshole. You just make shit up out of thin air. AKA a liar.

 

[I.P.Freely]

Huggy calm down, anyone with pubic hair realises that SJ is a disturb individual who eats his own faeces.

 

[S.J.]

I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.

I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.

Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?

Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.

I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.

You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.

That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.

You are mentally a cripple. For that I am truly sorry for the people around you. Here in the USA mental disease is recognized but seldom does it rise to any level of relief of guilt. You are still going to be held responsible for what YOU do and say. The involvement you seem to claim as righteous in other people's children's sexual development is really NONE of your concern. You are simply a pervert. You are just as principled as Bill O'Reilly, meaning that you are scum and truly have no such principles.

What I find astonishing is that you can claim any righteousness at all with a straight face. Just like O'Reilly you talk about who is trying to take advantage of the young teens and still have the gall to fantasize about their sexuality.

There are already laws prohibiting what you claim to be so incensed about...got it?...now stay away from young teens.

Hey fucktard, YOU'RE the one who thinks teachers should be able to show children pornography in the name of "education" and you accuse ME of being a pervert??? Fuck you, you slanderous POS.

No, you are the liar and the pervert. If you believe I have made a post where I think teachers should be able to show children porn then by all means post a link to it. Until you have done THAT you are simply someone that talks out of your asshole. You just make shit up out of thin air. AKA a liar.

All you have is name calling and flaming. You should take your perversion to the U.K. where it's considered normal. You and IP could live happily ever after together.