Justice and the Global Warming Scam

[PoliticalChic]

On this day, February 15, in the year 1910, 1910 Irena Sendler born (died May 12, 2008).

A Roman Catholic Polish social worker who helped save an estimated 2500 Jewish children from the Nazis by smuggling them out of the Warsaw Ghetto and giving them false identities. She was captured and nearly tortured to death.

She told a British newspaper that the greatest act of love she witnessed during the war was that of Jewish mothers parting with their children in the hope that they would live.
Irena Sendler: Woman who saved 2500 babies during the Holocaust - Page 2

Now, what does this have to do with "Environment"?

Check this out:

Irena Sendler was a candidate for the 2007 Noble Peace Prize, but the prize was award elsewhere....
snopes.com: Irena Sendler


Know where the prize went?
"The Nobel Peace Prize 2007
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , Al Gore"
The Nobel Peace Prize 2007


Just goes to show: the only places you can find justice is the dictionary and the cemetery.

 

[Old Rocks]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

 

[Old Rocks]

OPINION EUROPEFEBRUARY 10, 2011
The Weather Isn't Getting Weirder
The latest research belies the idea that storms are getting more extreme.

Last week a severe storm froze Dallas under a sheet of ice, just in time to disrupt the plans of the tens of thousands of (American) football fans descending on the city for the Super Bowl. On the other side of the globe, Cyclone Yasi slammed northeastern Australia, destroying homes and crops and displacing hundreds of thousands of people.

Some climate alarmists would have us believe that these storms are yet another baleful consequence of man-made CO2 emissions. In addition to the latest weather events, they also point to recent cyclones in Burma, last winter's fatal chills in Nepal and Bangladesh, December's blizzards in Britain, and every other drought, typhoon and unseasonable heat wave around the world.

But is it true? To answer that question, you need to understand whether recent weather trends are extreme by historical standards. The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project is the latest attempt to find out, using super-computers to generate a dataset of global atmospheric circulation from 1871 to the present.

As it happens, the project's initial findings, published last month, show no evidence of an intensifying weather trend. "In the climate models, the extremes get more extreme as we move into a doubled CO2 world in 100 years," atmospheric scientist Gilbert Compo, one of the researchers on the project, tells me from his office at the University of Colorado, Boulder. "So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871."
- WSJ.com

Man caused global warming has always been a hoax and Fat Albert Gore has gotten rich promoting the hoax.

It is amazing the number of people who have been duped by the BIG LIE.

Your proof of which is?

 

[Old Rocks]

Of which you just demostrated an amazing lack.

 

[Ernie S.]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

Please please PLEEEASE try to use logical thought when you post. FREEZING in the field

 

[Old Rocks]

Lord Monkton isn't a lord, and he is not a scientist. He is a fraud.

Christopher Monckton - SourceWatch

House Of Lords membership claim
Despite the passing of the 1999 House Of Lords Act (which stripped hereditary peers of instant admission to the House Of Lords) Christopher Monckton has claimed that he is "a member of the Upper House of the United Kingdom legislature"[12]. More recently he has claimed that he is a member "without the right to sit or vote"[13]. The House Of Lords themselves state that "Christopher Monckton is not and has never been a Member of the House of Lords. There is no such thing as a 'non-voting' or 'honorary' member."[14]


Nobel Laureate claim
Christopher Monckton claims on the website of the Science and Public Policy Institute that:

His contribution to the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report in 2007 - the correction of a table inserted by IPCC bureaucrats that had overstated tenfold the observed contribution of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets to sea-level rise - earned him the status of Nobel Peace Laureate. His Nobel prize pin, made of gold recovered from a physics experiment, was presented to him by the Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of Rochester, New York, USA -SPPInstitute website[15]

When Christopher Monckton visited Australia in early 2010 he conceeded that it was "it was a joke, a joke" and "never meant to be taken seriously". The Sydney Morning Herald noted that despite this, he had made the same claim with a "straight face" on the Alan Jones show one day prior, and the claim remained on the SPPInstitute website[16] where it can still be found six months later.

 

[Old Rocks]

Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming

IN the past few years, many workers have noted that the combined effect on climate of increases in the concentrations of a large number of trace gases could rival or even exceed that of the increasing concentration of carbon dioxide1–3. These trace gases, principally methane, nitrous oxide and chlorofluorocarbons, are present at concentrations that are two to six orders of magnitude lower than that of carbon dioxide, but are important because, per molecule, they absorb infrared radiation much more strongly than carbon dioxide. Indeed a recent study4 shows that trace gases are responsible for 43% of the increase in radiative forcing from 1980 to 1990 (Fig. 1). An index to compare the contribution of various 'greenhouse' gas emissions to global warming is needed to develop cost-effective strategies for limiting this warming. Estimates of relative contributions to additional greenhouse forcing during particular periods do not fully take into account differences in atmospheric residence times among the important greenhouse gases. Here we extend recent work on halocarbons5,6 by proposing an index of global warming potential for methane, carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide and CFCs relative to that of carbon dioxide. We find, for example, that methane has, per mole, a global warming potential 3.7 times that of carbon dioxide. On this basis, carbon dioxide emissions account for 80% of the contribution to global warming of current greenhouse gas emissions, as compared with 57% of the increase in radiative forcing for the 1980s.

 

[Old Rocks]

Here Gipper, read the real facts if you dare.

The Link Strong Between Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming | Global Climate Change Information

 

[westwall]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

Yeah his little propaganda piece with 35 errors of fact. And I wish we had that much power, if we did he would be in jail for fraud along with the rest of his lackey's. No, they are hoist on their own petard, they lost it, we didn't win it, makes it even more pathetic and is yet more evidence of how dim he really is.

 

[westwall]

Here Gipper, read the real facts if you dare.

The Link Strong Between Carbon Dioxide and Global Warming | Global Climate Change Information

Oak Ridge National Laboratories says you're full of poo....



http://www.ornl.gov/sci/aiche/presentations/AGW_AIChE.pdf

 

[Old Rocks]

No, Arvid Pasto states that. And states on page 32 that a graph that shows obviously no change in the last 30 years, when the graph shows just the opposite. In fact, the graph is that of Dr. Spencer. And shows a definate rise in temperatures in the troposphere.

 

[Ernie S.]

Doesn't all that straw grasping tire you out, Old Rocks?

 

[Old Rocks]

Look at the statement and the graph.

 

[skookerasbil]

OPINION EUROPEFEBRUARY 10, 2011
The Weather Isn't Getting Weirder
The latest research belies the idea that storms are getting more extreme.

Last week a severe storm froze Dallas under a sheet of ice, just in time to disrupt the plans of the tens of thousands of (American) football fans descending on the city for the Super Bowl. On the other side of the globe, Cyclone Yasi slammed northeastern Australia, destroying homes and crops and displacing hundreds of thousands of people.

Some climate alarmists would have us believe that these storms are yet another baleful consequence of man-made CO2 emissions. In addition to the latest weather events, they also point to recent cyclones in Burma, last winter's fatal chills in Nepal and Bangladesh, December's blizzards in Britain, and every other drought, typhoon and unseasonable heat wave around the world.

But is it true? To answer that question, you need to understand whether recent weather trends are extreme by historical standards. The Twentieth Century Reanalysis Project is the latest attempt to find out, using super-computers to generate a dataset of global atmospheric circulation from 1871 to the present.

As it happens, the project's initial findings, published last month, show no evidence of an intensifying weather trend. "In the climate models, the extremes get more extreme as we move into a doubled CO2 world in 100 years," atmospheric scientist Gilbert Compo, one of the researchers on the project, tells me from his office at the University of Colorado, Boulder. "So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871."
- WSJ.com

Man caused global warming has always been a hoax and Fat Albert Gore has gotten rich promoting the hoax.

It is amazing the number of people who have been duped by the BIG LIE.

Your proof of which is?

No.......the real question is..........

Where is the proof from Gore? How much does he have? Zero. This is precisely why he has never and will never publically debate anybody on the subject. He doesnt have to...........he's doing quite well with the bamboozling act now. He would be totally exposed if he opened himself up to debate. Brilliance on his part not to go there.


Think about it..........Old Rocks could walk around his workplace telling everybody he has a museum piece gorgan. He could do it for years.......even tape a toy store reptile in his drawers. 50% of the people are going to believe him after awhile but you could be damn sure he'll never drop his Levi's in public. Millions get scammed every day by people who know there are millions to be scammed. Its just a lifestyle for many...........dupe the suckers of the world.

But many of these people are fcukking fakes.........you think its an accident that somebody who advocates for phoney science ends up working in the middle of a fcukking forest for decades where your only fear of exposure is from a fcukking Ent? These people are almost invariably social invalids. Why do you think Gore lost the election in 2000? He's a social oddball, thats why!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

"... Al Gore made enough people aware ..."

No, Rocks, it was the East Anglia memos that made folks aware that it was a scam...

1. "I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting till about 2020. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office press release with Doug's paper that said something like -half the years to 2014 would exceed the warmest year currently on record, 1998!"
Power Line

2. "I seem to be getting an email a week from skeptics saying where's the warming gone. I know the warming is on the decadal scale, but it would be nice to wear their smug grins away."
Ibid.

3. ...pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for. Just over a month ago, on September 28, 2009, Tom Wigley wrote to Phil Jones of the Hadley Centre about his efforts to get the right-sized "blip" in temperatures of the 1940s:

"Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip."
Power Line - Global Warming Bombshell

4. ...the conclusion an observer is likely to draw from the CRU archive is that the climate alarmists are making up the science as they go along and are fitting facts to reach a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively seeking after truth. What they are doing is politics, not science. When I was in law school, this story was told about accountants:
A CEO is going to hire a new accountant and summons a series of candidates. He asks each applicant, "What is two plus two?" The first two candidates answer, "Four." They don't get the job. The third responds, "What do you want it to be?" He gets hired. The climate alarmists' attitude toward data appears to me much the same as that fictional accountant's attitude toward arithmetic.
Power Line - The Alarmists Do "Science": A Case Study



Rocks, much thanks, but....without you, I'd have to go back to knitting!

 

[skookerasbil]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

"... Al Gore made enough people aware ..."

No, Rocks, it was the East Anglia memos that made folks aware that it was a scam...

1. "I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting till about 2020. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office press release with Doug's paper that said something like -half the years to 2014 would exceed the warmest year currently on record, 1998!"
Power Line

2. "I seem to be getting an email a week from skeptics saying where's the warming gone. I know the warming is on the decadal scale, but it would be nice to wear their smug grins away."
Ibid.

3. ...pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for. Just over a month ago, on September 28, 2009, Tom Wigley wrote to Phil Jones of the Hadley Centre about his efforts to get the right-sized "blip" in temperatures of the 1940s:

"Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip."
Power Line - Global Warming Bombshell

4. ...the conclusion an observer is likely to draw from the CRU archive is that the climate alarmists are making up the science as they go along and are fitting facts to reach a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively seeking after truth. What they are doing is politics, not science. When I was in law school, this story was told about accountants:
A CEO is going to hire a new accountant and summons a series of candidates. He asks each applicant, "What is two plus two?" The first two candidates answer, "Four." They don't get the job. The third responds, "What do you want it to be?" He gets hired. The climate alarmists' attitude toward data appears to me much the same as that fictional accountant's attitude toward arithmetic.
Power Line - The Alarmists Do "Science": A Case Study



Rocks, much thanks, but....without you, I'd have to go back to knitting!

Indeed........and every retiring member of the IPCC says its a model of corruption.

 

[Old Rocks]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

"... Al Gore made enough people aware ..."

No, Rocks, it was the East Anglia memos that made folks aware that it was a scam...

1. "I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting till about 2020. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office press release with Doug's paper that said something like -half the years to 2014 would exceed the warmest year currently on record, 1998!"
Power Line

2. "I seem to be getting an email a week from skeptics saying where's the warming gone. I know the warming is on the decadal scale, but it would be nice to wear their smug grins away."
Ibid.

3. ...pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for. Just over a month ago, on September 28, 2009, Tom Wigley wrote to Phil Jones of the Hadley Centre about his efforts to get the right-sized "blip" in temperatures of the 1940s:

"Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip."
Power Line - Global Warming Bombshell

4. ...the conclusion an observer is likely to draw from the CRU archive is that the climate alarmists are making up the science as they go along and are fitting facts to reach a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively seeking after truth. What they are doing is politics, not science. When I was in law school, this story was told about accountants:
A CEO is going to hire a new accountant and summons a series of candidates. He asks each applicant, "What is two plus two?" The first two candidates answer, "Four." They don't get the job. The third responds, "What do you want it to be?" He gets hired. The climate alarmists' attitude toward data appears to me much the same as that fictional accountant's attitude toward arithmetic.
Power Line - The Alarmists Do "Science": A Case Study



Rocks, much thanks, but....without you, I'd have to go back to knitting!

So, PC, you also have your little tin hat on.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following groups say the danger of human-caused climate change is a … FACT:

U.S. Agency for International Development
United States Department of Agriculture
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
National Institute of Standards and Technology
United States Department of Defense
United States Department of Energy
National Institutes of Health
United States Department of State
United States Department of Transportation
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Aeronautics & Space Administration
National Science Foundation
Smithsonian Institution
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Council
African Academy of Sciences
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of Canada
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Académie des Sciences, France
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina of Germany
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy
Indian National Science Academy
Science Council of Japan
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Madagascar’s National Academy of Arts, Letters and Sciences
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of New Zealand
Polish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
l’Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Academy of Science of South Africa
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
The Royal Society of the United Kingdom
National Academy of Sciences, United States
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Science
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Physics
American Medical Association
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Society of Agronomy
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Botanical Society of America
Crop Science Society of America
Ecological Society of America
Federation of American Scientists
Geological Society of America
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Society of American Foresters
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Engineers Australia
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
Geological Society of Australia
British Antarctic Survey
Institute of Biology, UK
Royal Meteorological Society, UK
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization
The Democratic Party of America.


Climate Change – Have a look at the following lists. Which side are you on?

 

[Meister]

your an old record, roxie....and you refuse to follow the money.
but, i will say that you are faithful to your religion.

 

[Meister]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

You have not one shred of proof for you to state this.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I would like to state that Al Gore made enough people aware through his movie that we changed the trajectory of the warming of the earth from mankind's activities. However, people like you have prevented any such thing from happening.

Now I have lived for nearly seven decades, so I will not see all that you are going to see if you live as long as I have. But I have already seen far more affects from the warming than I, or the people who were telling us about this in the mid 60s, every thought we would see at this point. Will I ever see people like you admit that you were wrong? No, for you will find someone else to scapegoat for your politizition of a scientific problem.

This year we have seen the affects of the climate change that we are experiancing on food prices. This will get worse, especially for those in the third world. The unrest you see now in the Middle East will be very small in comparison to what we will see in a few years as hundreds of millions find themselves in a starvation situation.

"... Al Gore made enough people aware ..."

No, Rocks, it was the East Anglia memos that made folks aware that it was a scam...

1. "I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting till about 2020. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office press release with Doug's paper that said something like -half the years to 2014 would exceed the warmest year currently on record, 1998!"
Power Line

2. "I seem to be getting an email a week from skeptics saying where's the warming gone. I know the warming is on the decadal scale, but it would be nice to wear their smug grins away."
Ibid.

3. ...pro-global warming scientists fudge data to get the results they are looking for. Just over a month ago, on September 28, 2009, Tom Wigley wrote to Phil Jones of the Hadley Centre about his efforts to get the right-sized "blip" in temperatures of the 1940s:

"Phil, Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip. If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I'm sure you know). So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC, then this would be significant for the global mean -- but we'd still have to explain the land blip."
Power Line - Global Warming Bombshell

4. ...the conclusion an observer is likely to draw from the CRU archive is that the climate alarmists are making up the science as they go along and are fitting facts to reach a predetermined conclusion rather than objectively seeking after truth. What they are doing is politics, not science. When I was in law school, this story was told about accountants:
A CEO is going to hire a new accountant and summons a series of candidates. He asks each applicant, "What is two plus two?" The first two candidates answer, "Four." They don't get the job. The third responds, "What do you want it to be?" He gets hired. The climate alarmists' attitude toward data appears to me much the same as that fictional accountant's attitude toward arithmetic.
Power Line - The Alarmists Do "Science": A Case Study



Rocks, much thanks, but....without you, I'd have to go back to knitting!

So, PC, you also have your little tin hat on.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following groups say the danger of human-caused climate change is a … FACT:

U.S. Agency for International Development
United States Department of Agriculture
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
National Institute of Standards and Technology
United States Department of Defense
United States Department of Energy
National Institutes of Health
United States Department of State
United States Department of Transportation
U.S. Geological Survey
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
National Center for Atmospheric Research
National Aeronautics & Space Administration
National Science Foundation
Smithsonian Institution
International Arctic Science Committee
Arctic Council
African Academy of Sciences
Australian Academy of Sciences
Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium for Sciences and the Arts
Academia Brasileira de Ciéncias
Cameroon Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of Canada
Caribbean Academy of Sciences
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Académie des Sciences, France
Ghana Academy of Arts and Sciences
Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina of Germany
Indonesian Academy of Sciences
Royal Irish Academy
Accademia nazionale delle scienze of Italy
Indian National Science Academy
Science Council of Japan
Kenya National Academy of Sciences
Madagascar’s National Academy of Arts, Letters and Sciences
Academy of Sciences Malaysia
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias
Nigerian Academy of Sciences
Royal Society of New Zealand
Polish Academy of Sciences
Russian Academy of Sciences
l’Académie des Sciences et Techniques du Sénégal
Academy of Science of South Africa
Sudan Academy of Sciences
Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Tanzania Academy of Sciences
Turkish Academy of Sciences
Uganda National Academy of Sciences
The Royal Society of the United Kingdom
National Academy of Sciences, United States
Zambia Academy of Sciences
Zimbabwe Academy of Science
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association for the Advancement of Science
American Association of Wildlife Veterinarians
American Astronomical Society
American Chemical Society
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Geophysical Union
American Institute of Physics
American Medical Association
American Meteorological Society
American Physical Society
American Public Health Association
American Quaternary Association
American Institute of Biological Sciences
American Society of Agronomy
American Society for Microbiology
American Society of Plant Biologists
American Statistical Association
Association of Ecosystem Research Centers
Botanical Society of America
Crop Science Society of America
Ecological Society of America
Federation of American Scientists
Geological Society of America
National Association of Geoscience Teachers
Natural Science Collections Alliance
Organization of Biological Field Stations
Society of American Foresters
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
Society of Systematic Biologists
Soil Science Society of America
Australian Coral Reef Society
Australian Medical Association
Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
Engineers Australia
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies
Geological Society of Australia
British Antarctic Survey
Institute of Biology, UK
Royal Meteorological Society, UK
Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society
European Federation of Geologists
European Geosciences Union
European Physical Society
European Science Foundation
International Association for Great Lakes Research
International Union for Quaternary Research
International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
World Federation of Public Health Associations
World Health Organization
World Meteorological Organization
The Democratic Party of America.


Climate Change – Have a look at the following lists. Which side are you on?

Oh, man...the award for comic relief is this one:
"Zimbabwe Academy of Science"