Just wait a while there may be hostages after all

[BlindBoo]

You are little more that a Peoples Temple drone defending Jim Jones. You have utterly no respect for reality or truth, and utter virtually anything in defense of your little tin god.

{
NBC’s chief foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell told Meet the Press host David Gregory Sunday that the Obama administration’s original account of the terrorist attack in Benghazi was in fact a coverup.

The Obama administration, including then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton were trying to conceal the existence of a covert Central Intelligence Agency base at the same diplomatic outpost where Ambassador Christopher Stevens was murdered.
- See more at: http://rare.us/story/andrea-mitchell-original-benghazi-story-was-a-coverup/#sthash.6flogx2y.dpuf}

Jim Jones Drone? Really?

The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs.

Mr. Abu Khattala had become well known in Benghazi for his role in the killing of a rebel general, and then for declaring that his fellow Islamists were insufficiently committed to theocracy. He made no secret of his readiness to use violence against Western interests. One of his allies, the leader of Benghazi’s most overtly anti-Western militia, Ansar al-Shariah, boasted a few months before the attack that his fighters could “flatten” the American Mission. Surveillance of the American compound appears to have been underway at least 12 hours before the assault started.

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

It's the same link to the Times article you posted.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Jim Jones Drone? Really?

Yeah, it's unfair to the Peoples Temple cult members, they were far more rational and in touch with reality than you.

The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs.

Mr. Abu Khattala had become well known in Benghazi for his role in the killing of a rebel general, and then for declaring that his fellow Islamists were insufficiently committed to theocracy. He made no secret of his readiness to use violence against Western interests. One of his allies, the leader of Benghazi’s most overtly anti-Western militia, Ansar al-Shariah, boasted a few months before the attack that his fighters could “flatten” the American Mission. Surveillance of the American compound appears to have been underway at least 12 hours before the assault started.

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

It's the same link to the Times article you posted.

Again, the attack was planned, as even the Times had to admit. Of course the video, along with the usual Jooo hatred, was used to inflame the Muslims, as cartoons and TV shows, including South Park (no doubt one of your primary news sources) have been used.

Al Qaeda did what Al Qaeda does, used a small core contingent to inflame the ignorant and bigoted average Muslim on the street.

 

[BlindBoo]

Jim Jones Drone? Really?

Yeah, it's unfair to the Peoples Temple cult members, they were far more rational and in touch with reality than you.

The investigation by The Times shows that the reality in Benghazi was different, and murkier, than either of those story lines suggests. Benghazi was not infiltrated by Al Qaeda, but nonetheless contained grave local threats to American interests. The attack does not appear to have been meticulously planned, but neither was it spontaneous or without warning signs.

Mr. Abu Khattala had become well known in Benghazi for his role in the killing of a rebel general, and then for declaring that his fellow Islamists were insufficiently committed to theocracy. He made no secret of his readiness to use violence against Western interests. One of his allies, the leader of Benghazi’s most overtly anti-Western militia, Ansar al-Shariah, boasted a few months before the attack that his fighters could “flatten” the American Mission. Surveillance of the American compound appears to have been underway at least 12 hours before the assault started.

The violence, though, also had spontaneous elements. Anger at the video motivated the initial attack. Dozens of people joined in, some of them provoked by the video and others responding to fast-spreading false rumors that guards inside the American compound had shot Libyan protesters. Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack, according to more than a dozen Libyan witnesses as well as many American officials who have viewed the footage from security cameras.

It's the same link to the Times article you posted.

Again, the attack was planned, as even the Times had to admit. Of course the video, along with the usual Jooo hatred, was used to inflame the Muslims, as cartoons and TV shows, including South Park (no doubt one of your primary news sources) have been used.

Al Qaeda did what Al Qaeda does, used a small core contingent to inflame the ignorant and bigoted average Muslim on the street.

The attacks on our embassy by al Qaeda in Kenya and Tanzania were planned coordinated attacks that killed hundred in the initial explosions and building collapse. The death of the two diplomats appears to be caused by the Mod action, or as the NYTs' states " Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack

Say aren't you off message when you admit that the video played a role in the attack? Your pseudo-con masters will be very displeased with you.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The attacks on our embassy by al Qaeda in Kenya and Tanzania were planned coordinated attacks that killed hundred in the initial explosions and building collapse. The death of the two diplomats appears to be caused by the Mod action, or as the NYTs' states " Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack

Say aren't you off message when you admit that the video played a role in the attack? Your pseudo-con masters will be very displeased with you.

Boo, you are a partisan. You take the party line and seek sources that support the conclusion the party instructed you to make.

I work differently. I take the facts and draw the conclusion that the facts lead to. You really wouldn't understand.

{"I will tell you this, by witness testimony and a year and a half of interviewing everyone that was in the ground by the way, either by an FBI investigator or the committee: It was very clear to the individuals on the ground that this was an Al Qaeda-led event. And they had pretty fairly descriptive events early on that lead those folks on the ground, doing the fighting, to the conclusion that this was a pre-planned, organized terrorist event," Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., told Fox News in a November interview.

"Not a video, that whole part was debunked time and time again," Rogers added of the attack which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, "which just leads to questions of why the administration hung with that narrative for so long when all the folks who participated on the ground saw something different."}

House Intelligence chair: Benghazi attack 'Al Qaeda-led event' | Fox News

Al Qaeda are evil, but not dumb. Creating flash mobs is one of their specialties. Inflaming mobs is done with all sorts of devices, using an obscure video on YouTube is precisely the sort of tactic Al Qaeda uses.

The attack was highly planned and tightly executed, including inflaming the flash mobs.

To further this, despite the NY Times attempt to whitewash the Obama/Clinton cascade of lies, notice that the actual video had virtually NO traffic to it;


{m the data we have, it’s hard for us to reach the conclusion that the consulate attack was motivated by the movie. Nothing in the immediate picture – surrounding the attack in Libya -- suggests that,” Jeff Chapman, chief executive with Agincourt Solutions told Fox News.

Chapman says his analysts reviewed postings in Libya, including those from Benghazi, over a three-day period beginning on Sept. 11.

After identifying a geographic area and isolating a time frame, Chapman says his analysts can then “vacuum” up all of the social media postings, which are then analyzed in the original language using mathematical models. The firm previously has done work for government agencies and Fortune 500 companies.}

Analysis of social media in Libya finds no reference to anti-Islam film on day of attack | Fox News

Thus, the only way that the flash mobs COULD be inflamed was through Al Qaeda agitators relating incendiary tales of the video, not from the video itself.

 

[BlindBoo]

The attacks on our embassy by al Qaeda in Kenya and Tanzania were planned coordinated attacks that killed hundred in the initial explosions and building collapse. The death of the two diplomats appears to be caused by the Mod action, or as the NYTs' states " Looters and arsonists, without any sign of a plan, were the ones who ravaged the compound after the initial attack

Say aren't you off message when you admit that the video played a role in the attack? Your pseudo-con masters will be very displeased with you.

Boo, you are a partisan. You take the party line and seek sources that support the conclusion the party instructed you to make.

I work differently. I take the facts and draw the conclusion that the facts lead to. You really wouldn't understand.

{"I will tell you this, by witness testimony and a year and a half of interviewing everyone that was in the ground by the way, either by an FBI investigator or the committee: It was very clear to the individuals on the ground that this was an Al Qaeda-led event. And they had pretty fairly descriptive events early on that lead those folks on the ground, doing the fighting, to the conclusion that this was a pre-planned, organized terrorist event," Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich., told Fox News in a November interview.

"Not a video, that whole part was debunked time and time again," Rogers added of the attack which killed Ambassador Chris Stevens, Foreign Service officer Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, "which just leads to questions of why the administration hung with that narrative for so long when all the folks who participated on the ground saw something different."}

House Intelligence chair: Benghazi attack 'Al Qaeda-led event' | Fox News

Al Qaeda are evil, but not dumb. Creating flash mobs is one of their specialties. Inflaming mobs is done with all sorts of devices, using an obscure video on YouTube is precisely the sort of tactic Al Qaeda uses.

The attack was highly planned and tightly executed, including inflaming the flash mobs.

To further this, despite the NY Times attempt to whitewash the Obama/Clinton cascade of lies, notice that the actual video had virtually NO traffic to it;


{m the data we have, it’s hard for us to reach the conclusion that the consulate attack was motivated by the movie. Nothing in the immediate picture – surrounding the attack in Libya -- suggests that,” Jeff Chapman, chief executive with Agincourt Solutions told Fox News.

Chapman says his analysts reviewed postings in Libya, including those from Benghazi, over a three-day period beginning on Sept. 11.

After identifying a geographic area and isolating a time frame, Chapman says his analysts can then “vacuum” up all of the social media postings, which are then analyzed in the original language using mathematical models. The firm previously has done work for government agencies and Fortune 500 companies.}

Analysis of social media in Libya finds no reference to anti-Islam film on day of attack | Fox News

Thus, the only way that the flash mobs COULD be inflamed was through Al Qaeda agitators relating incendiary tales of the video, not from the video itself.

They used the video to inflame the masses? Like was done in Cairo? The difference is Cairo doesn't have armed militia in every neighborhood, which is probably a good thing for the Americans inside the Embassy there.

 

[Uncensored2008]

They used the video to inflame the masses? Like was done in Cairo? The difference is Cairo doesn't have armed militia in every neighborhood, which is probably a good thing for the Americans inside the Embassy there.

The Muslim Brotherhood (Al Qaeda) was already in charge in Egypt at that time. And there were PLENTY of armed people, but since Obama had helped put Al Qaeda in charge, there was no need to attack.