Just an Observation.

Liberals destroyed the family structure. Liberals destroyed the moral fiber of the country. Liberals think they have the right to take our money and give it to others. Liberals ignore the laws of this land. Liberals have destroyed our school system. Liberals ran this Government into the ground for 40 years. Liberals taught our enemies if they kill enough of us we will quit. Liberals sold out South Viet Nam ( ohh and FDR sold out Eastern Europe and Nationalist China). Liberals are robbing the Social Security and Interstate funds.

Shall I go on?
DAM! I can get another cup of coffee ... this says it all
ahh thats no fun there is a time to be liberal and a time for conservatism. always one way is pig headed but your right about the extreemes using their prospective " terms of distain" for each other
 
DAM! I can get another cup of coffee ... this says it all
ahh thats no fun there is a time to be liberal and a time for conservatism. always one way is pig headed but your right about the extreemes using their prospective " terms of distain" for each other

where did he mention "respective" terms of disdain.... those were right-wing psycho terms of disdain... and he actually believes that stuff.

Now THAT'S funny...
 
jsanders posted:

Join the cause, stop Barack Obama!

Yes, vote for Ron Paul!
 
Probably they are...


This is some more of what liberals want....


They want a classless society. I mean it is always big oil companys who are stealing from the little guy and if we could just spread the wealth.


They want socialism:
An economic and social system under which essential industries and social services are publicly and cooperatively owned and democratically controlled with a view to equal opportunity and equal benefit for all. Can we say free medical for all?

What do you mean by classless society?
 
Rayboy,


This is what you posted:


Liberals ignore the laws of this land. Which ones?




My answer to which ones? Well for starters how about this one....

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=60641

"You see, the American Library Association, which is the controlling influence over libraries nationwide, views pornography and obscenity as 'intellectual freedom.' Because of this, many libraries in the U.S. allow child pornographers to use their Internet system undetected and unreported. Is it any wonder why child molestation has become so common?"


basically Libraries like to fire people who work there if they call the police on people who like to view child porn. While it is a crime to view child porn Libraians are taught and promoted to keep porn as intellectual freedom.


I guess this means you wouldnt mind if your grandchild was molested while reading a book in a library because heck it is all good!


Then there is this:


"According to the association's own Web page regarding intellectual freedom and censorship, it is not the work of a library to protect children from material that is "legally obscene."


Funny thing about liberals:


"When parent groups have offered to place books in libraries with conservative themes or are critical of the left, the ALA's claims of being First Amendment guardians suddenly look fraudulent. When one parent tried to donate George Grant's book, 'Killer Angel,' a critical biography of Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger, the library sent a letter stating that 'the author's political and social agenda…is not appropriate.' Huh? A biographical book with zero profanity is banned but books that feature the 'F' word a hundred times are sought after with zeal. Go figure," Baldwin wrote."



YEA LIBERALS! They can't take the heat so they pull censorship....Biggest fuckin hypocrites on the planet.

I spend time at least 4 days a week a public college library in a liberal town with an ultra liberal college, and I've seen men getting arrested for looking at porn. Twice in the last week a library worker called in the cops because of porn watchers. I'm only in the library for about 12 hours a week, and I saw 2 incidents, so I'm pretty sure it happens even more frequently.

To say that liberals are at fault for kids getting molested at libraries is simply the stupidest thing I have EVER read on this message board. Conservatives must be ashamed to have proclaim the same title as yourself.

I'm being totally serious. Your comment was the DUMBEST POST EVER
 
The major difference between liberals and conservatives is money. Liberals want to spread the money out so that the poor are less poor and the rich are less rich. No corporate welfare, but we want social welfare.

Conservatives want corporate welfare, but not social welfare. They believe this will stimulate the economy and make everyone more money.

As of right now, the conservative strategy has failed in the last 7 years.
 
The major difference between liberals and conservatives is money. Liberals want to spread the money out so that the poor are less poor and the rich are less rich. No corporate welfare, but we want social welfare.

Conservatives want corporate welfare, but not social welfare. They believe this will stimulate the economy and make everyone more money.

As of right now, the conservative strategy has failed in the last 7 years.

So liberals are socialists is what you're saying. Hasn't Russia already proved how well that system doesn't work?

FYI, here's the wikipedia definiton of socialism
Socialism refers to a group of ideologies and political movements with the goal of a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[1] This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, worker, or community ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments throughout history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

So, why work hard and improve yourself when you know that some dumb schmuck that does work hard is going to have to give his money to you. Seems like a system guaranteed to make everyone underachieve.
 
So liberals are socialists is what you're saying. Hasn't Russia already proved how well that system doesn't work?

FYI, here's the wikipedia definiton of socialism
Socialism refers to a group of ideologies and political movements with the goal of a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community.[1] This control may be either direct—exercised through popular collectives such as workers' councils—or indirect—exercised on behalf of the people by the state. As an economic system, socialism is often characterized by state, worker, or community ownership of the means of production, goals which have been attributed to, and claimed by, a number of political parties and governments throughout history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

So, why work hard and improve yourself when you know that some dumb schmuck that does work hard is going to have to give his money to you. Seems like a system guaranteed to make everyone underachieve.

Conservatives favor corporate socialism.

Libertarians view both ideologies as just different sides of the same coin.
 
So tell me all the terrible things that liberals have done beside found this country.

I wouldn't say that "liberals" - per the meaning of the term today - founded our country. There are different types of liberals.

Our founders were "classical liberals" or economic liberals and closer in meaning to those we now refer to as "conservatives".

New or reform liberalism, also called "social liberals", developed in the late 19th century and these are the types of liberals are who we generally refer today as "liberals" - and who are incrementally turning our country into a socialist/communist state as they encourage government to become more and more intrusive.

Classical liberals believe that the provision of negative rights, that is freedom from coercion alone, constitutes freedom. As a result they see state intervention in the economy as a coercive power that restricts freedom when enforced coercively by law, emphasize laissez-faire economic policy, and oppose the welfare state.

Social liberals argue that freedom from economic as well as physical coercion is necessary for real freedom. They generally favor such positive rights as the right to vote, the right to an education, the right to health care, and the right to a living wage. Some also favor laws against discrimination in housing and employment, laws against pollution of the environment, and the provision of welfare, including unemployment benefit and housing for the homeless, all supported by progressive taxation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
 
So the woman who works at the local school cafeteria and then at night at the grocery store just to make end's meat is lazy?

No, but why should anyone be forced to provide her with a better financial life out of their own wallet?
 
So the woman who works at the local school cafeteria and then at night at the grocery store just to make end's meat is lazy?

What a pompous ass.


Where did I say that, jackass? She's a hard worker and doing better then someone who sits at home waiting for the welfare check that the libs want to hand to everyone.
 
Where did I say that, jackass? She's a hard worker and doing better then someone who sits at home waiting for the welfare check that the libs want to hand to everyone.

Yet she still has to have government aid. Minimum wage is at a whopping $6.25. Even at 40 hours a week, there's no way a single parent household can feed a family of even one child on that salary. Maybe if corporations would be a little more willing to compensate their employees enough, they wouldn't need handouts. So, instead, we are forced to take the money from the corporations and hand it out to everyone, even the ones who aren't working.

Here's an idea, why don't we petition for a higher minimum wage, abolishment of Social Security, and lower taxes for corporations. That way corporations are still paying to help those in need, but deadbeats can't get free handouts.
 
Here's an idea, why don't we petition for a higher minimum wage, abolishment of Social Security, and lower taxes for corporations. That way corporations are still paying to help those in need, but deadbeats can't get free handouts.

This is proof positive that you have no clue why you even support Hillary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top