Just a thought...

I'm a gun owner, a second amendment rights advocate, and I don't believe in any type of small arm weapons controls.

However...cops most everywhere know that 94% of Americans lack the balls to shoot an armed intruder. Most of the time they hide or flee.

It's a losing argument for our side of the gun control argument to use the concept that a armed citizens make all of us more safe. They're just not that brave on the average

I'm a gun owner and believe in the second amendment and agree completely with what you've written.

further, I believe it is utterly unAmerican that some are fighting for the RIGHT of criminals, illegal aliens and people who are on our terrorist list to be able to easily buy firearms on line and at gun shows.

More than 40% of all gun purchases are made at gun shows.

This past couple of weeks the criminals, illegal aliens and terrorists have been stocking up - all at the invitation of the radical right wing gun nuts.

You have evidence that a significant portion of gun sold recently were #1 sold at gun shows, and #2, sold to criminals, illegal aliens and terrorists?
LINK?

What you have is a talking point, an agenda and shit for brains.

The right is on the side of criminals, illegals, terrorists.

Gun Show Loophole - Coalition to Stop Gun Violence

PolitiFact | Mayor Michael Bloomberg says 40 percent of guns are sold without a background check

Fact Sheet: Gun Show Loophole Arms Criminals « Gun Victims Action Council

Gunshow Undercover - Arizona

If, by chance, you have access to the internet, there are more than 45 MILLION more links. Feel free to read them or not but the fact is, YOU are on the wrong side of history on this.

Americans should be fighting to keep ALL guns out of the hands of illegals, criminals and terrorists and the R is doing just the opposite.

While you're twiddling your thumbs, they're stocking up.
 
So instead of being a story about a poor inncoent farmer protecting himself, it turns out to be a story about a man who shot another, not to protect himself, but because he was pissed off at him.

He shot a man in the back and killed him because he was pissed off at him. He gets three years and a hefty chunk of change for his story???

Why does it not surprise me that crucial elements of this story were deleted and then circulated around to promote a political cause?

Man - you people REALLY need to start checking under the hood and stop swallowing every little thing your cult leaders put on your plate.
So, it looks like we can put your name under the "believes it's morally superior to be murdered by a criminal than to defend yourself with a firearm" column.

Not that there was ever any doubt.

How was a guy you shot in the back a threat to murder you?

You have a right to use reasonable force to defend yourself. NOT to "exact your own style of justice."

Idiots who don't know the difference make a compelling case FOR gun control.
Someone in my house with a weapon IS a threat.
 
Do you live in Great Britian?
Do you have any idea of the number of accidental deaths and suicides here in the USA by gun? And we put up with massacres of young kids. All so you can entertain your fantasy of shooting the robber who is breaking in to your house.

Or is it the fantasy of repealing the invasion of the body snatchers a.k.a. jack booted government thugs coming to take your guns and liberty.

How many invasions you repealed?

How many times has a breakin occured at your house?

How come your fantasies/fears are more important than other peoples realities?
How many times have the police shown up in time to prevent crime?

Since when are the police called before a crime is committed?
There you have it, folks: The reason everyone who wants to legally own a weapon should be allowed to.

The cops' job is to show up after and count the bodies. They have no legal responsibility to protect citizens.
What a dumb thing to say.
Not really. You want the police to protect everyone instead of everyone taking that responsibility for themselves...then you admit they can't do it.
"Citations" have been posted repeatedly - more guns are not an answer unless you want more gun deaths.
All the laws you want will do is disarm the law-abiding.

That will do nothing but make more gun deaths.
 
Do you live in Great Britian?
Do you have any idea of the number of accidental deaths and suicides here in the USA by gun? And we put up with massacres of young kids. All so you can entertain your fantasy of shooting the robber who is breaking in to your house.

Or is it the fantasy of repealing the invasion of the body snatchers a.k.a. jack booted government thugs coming to take your guns and liberty.

How many invasions you repealed?

How many times has a breakin occured at your house?

How come your fantasies/fears are more important than other peoples realities?
Sp[oken like a true libtard socialist.
 
The OP is an ancient email from about ten years ago.

Tony Martin was not sentenced to life.

Mr Martin's conviction for murder, in April 2000, caused a national outcry. It was reduced to manslaughter and the sentence cut to five years on appeal.

His release was delayed until the summer of 2003 because he refused to express any remorse over the death of Mr Barras.


'I don't regret shooting dead teenage burglar', says remorseless farmer Tony Martin | Mail Online


He served 3 years.

As for the burglars, one died. But the others involved served time:



Mr. Martin made out all right:

July 28, 2003 - Mr Martin is released from custody. He sells his story to the Daily Mirror for £100,000.

How interesting that the OP was based on untruths.
:( The poor burgl -- I mean, disadvantaged youths.
 
We don't do much here at USMB, but we sure do demolish the odds when it comes to politically conservative people having their homes broken into and thwarting violent crimes.

Someone should do a study of some kind.

What are you saying, son?
Instance like those I related don't become part of the statistics because they usually go unreported.
I would bet that there are 10 or 20,000 instances/year where firearms prevent a violent crime without a shot being fired.

What I am saying, boy, is that you are full of shit.
"I don't LIKE it!!" is not really a rational basis for deciding something is a lie.

But that seems to be all the left has.
 
What I am saying, boy, is that you are full of shit.

Like I said above, no shots were fired and both instances went unreported.
You can call me what you want, but is there some reason anyone would believe you?

You lie like most people breathe.
e05ddf60574606562061562.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top