Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
By definition, Assange is not a traitor.rethuglicans look to traitors for all their news...
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.
Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.
Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.
julian Assange is bought and paid for by putin, psycho boy
It doesn't matter if Russian's are feeding them information, what matters is that /none/ of the information they've put out has been proven fake. They're showing corruption because that's what they do - anarchists who want to take down corrupt leaders, nothing more. If the information came from criminals, they'd post it, if it came from rapists, they'd post it, and if it comes from the enemies of whatever country, yeah, they'll post it. ANY evidence of corruption that shows up to them, and checks out, is going to be posted - that is what whistleblowers do and why they're considered to be in a "grey" legal area.
Wikileaks is not media, they're an anarchist group, they're active all over the world and are "against" every nation's government in the world - including Putin; a shit ton of the "bad shit" and "corruption" you know about him actually comes from Assange because he wanted to stop Putin from gaining power in Russia. Assange failed there because the Russian people wanted Putin - same as he failed to impress with his personal opinion that Trump was a moron and shouldn't (in fact, "wouldn't be allowed to") be elected, the people didn't heed his advice there either. If you actually pay attention to what Assange says, rather than the carefully cherry picked bullshit the media feeds you, you'll see that he's got no "nation allies," only fellow 'hactivists' who feed him information. It's a bunch of watchdog private investigators who dig up shit, leak shit, and steal shit in a quasi-illegal effort to show the world how horrible everyone in power is. Assange, at best, kind of directs shit in whom he is going to out; I 'might' buy the idea that he sat on some info about Trump because he wanted Trump more than Clinton, but that's as far as that goes and even that is a stretch because Assange doesn't care if /all/ the governments in the nation fail.
It doesn't matter if Russian's are feeding them information, what matters is that /none/ of the information they've put out has been proven fake. They're showing corruption because that's what they do - anarchists who want to take down corrupt leaders, nothing more. If the information came from criminals, they'd post it, if it came from rapists, they'd post it, and if it comes from the enemies of whatever country, yeah, they'll post it. ANY evidence of corruption that shows up to them, and checks out, is going to be posted - that is what whistleblowers do and why they're considered to be in a "grey" legal area.
Wikileaks is not media, they're an anarchist group, they're active all over the world and are "against" every nation's government in the world - including Putin; a shit ton of the "bad shit" and "corruption" you know about him actually comes from Assange because he wanted to stop Putin from gaining power in Russia. Assange failed there because the Russian people wanted Putin - same as he failed to impress with his personal opinion that Trump was a moron and shouldn't (in fact, "wouldn't be allowed to") be elected, the people didn't heed his advice there either. If you actually pay attention to what Assange says, rather than the carefully cherry picked bullshit the media feeds you, you'll see that he's got no "nation allies," only fellow 'hactivists' who feed him information. It's a bunch of watchdog private investigators who dig up shit, leak shit, and steal shit in a quasi-illegal effort to show the world how horrible everyone in power is. Assange, at best, kind of directs shit in whom he is going to out; I 'might' buy the idea that he sat on some info about Trump because he wanted Trump more than Clinton, but that's as far as that goes and even that is a stretch because Assange doesn't care if /all/ the governments in the nation fail.
They are selectively showing corruption. They didn't show any of the RNC attempts to derail the Trump candidacy or the attempt at changing the convention rules. They only showed things that made Hillary and the Democrats look bad. That's propaganda not corruption.
And much of what the Russian Troll farmers like Mind Wars here posts is false or misleading. Especially the anti-Clinton stuff.
Assange hates Hillary Clinton. Always has. He's deranged on the topic.
"What does make a difference is political accountability, a general deterrence set to stoppolitical organizations[MY organization vs your organization = USA] behaving in a 'corrupt' manner. That can make a difference, because that changes the perception of what you can do or not do. And so, always—well, almost always, you should choose the principled position, which is to set a disciplinary signal about acting in a corrupt way, and take a philosophical position, which is our institutions can only be as good as our understanding of our institutions."
MR CORRUPT CRIMINAL julian assange says a WHOLE LOT of nothing right there ^
US calls Assange 'enemy of state'
US Vice-President labelled Mr Assange a "high-tech terrorist" in December 2010 and US congressional leaders have called for him to be charged with espionage.
Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee - both once involved in presidential campaigns - have both urged that Mr Assange be "hunted down".
Mr Assange's US attorney, Michael Ratner, said the designation of WikiLeaks as an "enemy" had serious implications for the WikiLeaks publisher if he were to be extradited to the US, including possible military detention.
US Army private Bradley Manning faces a court martial charged with aiding the enemy - identified as al-Qaeda - by transmitting information that, published by WikiLeaks, became available to the enemy.
Under US law it would most likely have been considered criminal for the US Air Force analyst to communicate classified material to journalists and publishers, but those journalists and publishers would not have been considered the enemy or prosecuted.
outing corruption... stop the fucking presses. my corruption is better than your corruption.
Assange is correct, there is plenty wrong with the old battle ax
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.
Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.
She does drinks out of her own Colostomy bag, if that isn’t wrong I don’t know what is. LolAssange is correct, there is plenty wrong with the old battle ax
Don't be stupid. You don't have proof and neither does the idiot OP.
Prove it or STFU