Julian Assange: There's something wrong with Hillary Clinton

trump is the traitor, forever crying over supposed fake news.

julian assange is an enemy of the state, peddling trumpswab news for idiots.
8160184665_4edbcf8bd5.jpg



this CRAP is fit for lining the parrot cage.
 
llary Clinton: Wikileaks a 'tool of Russian intelligence' and Assange does 'bidding of dictator'

The Telegraph October 15, 2017


Hillary Clinton lashed out at Julian Assange on Monday, accusing WikiLeaks of being a "tool of Russian intelligence" while its founder did "the bidding of a dictator".

The former Democratic presidential nominee said the whistle-blowing website worked with Russia to deflect attention away from an infamous tape of Donald Trump bragging about groping women in the run-up to the US election.

The former secretary of state’s devastating election loss to Mr Trump remains raw and she has blamed a number of factors for her election defeat as she promotes her book What Happened.

In an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Monday, she attacked Mr Assange for his alleged role in damaging her candidacy.

"Assange has become a kind of nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator," she said, referring to Russian president Vladimir Putin.

Hillary Clinton: Wikileaks a 'tool of Russian intelligence' and Assange does 'bidding of dictator'
----------
 
Julian Assange: Choosing Between Trump or Clinton is Like Picking Between Cholera or Gonorrhea | Democracy Now!

AMY GOODMAN: Finally, Julian, we cut you off earlier when you were talking about what you felt were the most significant emails that you have released. Is there any last one that you’d like to mention? And also, do you have any thoughts on Donald Trump? I mean, just before we went to air, a CNN poll came out that says Donald Trump is ahead by 5 percentage points of Hillary Clinton. Now, he did just come off of the Republican convention, but many called it the worst convention in history, so it’s not automatic that he should have had this percentage lead. Of course, though, you have the crisis, the disarray, the Democratic Party is in because of these emails that you’ve released.

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, you’re asking me, do I prefer cholera or gonorrhea? Personally, I would prefer neither. Look, I think—you know, we know how politics works in the United States. Whoever—whatever political party gets into government is going to merge with the bureaucracy pretty damn fast. It will be in a position where it has some levers in its hand. And so, as a result, corporate lobbyists will move in to help control those levers. So it doesn’t make much difference in the end. What does make a difference is political accountability, a general deterrence set to stop political organizations behaving in a corrupt manner. That can make a difference, because that changes the perception of what you can do or not do. And so, always—well, almost always, you should choose the principled position, which is to set a disciplinary signal about acting in a corrupt way, and take a philosophical position, which is our institutions can only be as good as our understanding of our institutions.

^^ That's Assange, not the cherry picked collusion bullshit your media is feeding you...
 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.

Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.

julian Assange is bought and paid for by putin, psycho boy
 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.

Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.

julian Assange is bought and paid for by putin, psycho boy

^^^^^ Loon ^^^^^

-Geaux
 
It doesn't matter if Russian's are feeding them information, what matters is that /none/ of the information they've put out has been proven fake. They're showing corruption because that's what they do - anarchists who want to take down corrupt leaders, nothing more. If the information came from criminals, they'd post it, if it came from rapists, they'd post it, and if it comes from the enemies of whatever country, yeah, they'll post it. ANY evidence of corruption that shows up to them, and checks out, is going to be posted - that is what whistleblowers do and why they're considered to be in a "grey" legal area.

Wikileaks is not media, they're an anarchist group, they're active all over the world and are "against" every nation's government in the world - including Putin; a shit ton of the "bad shit" and "corruption" you know about him actually comes from Assange because he wanted to stop Putin from gaining power in Russia. Assange failed there because the Russian people wanted Putin - same as he failed to impress with his personal opinion that Trump was a moron and shouldn't (in fact, "wouldn't be allowed to") be elected, the people didn't heed his advice there either. If you actually pay attention to what Assange says, rather than the carefully cherry picked bullshit the media feeds you, you'll see that he's got no "nation allies," only fellow 'hactivists' who feed him information. It's a bunch of watchdog private investigators who dig up shit, leak shit, and steal shit in a quasi-illegal effort to show the world how horrible everyone in power is. Assange, at best, kind of directs shit in whom he is going to out; I 'might' buy the idea that he sat on some info about Trump because he wanted Trump more than Clinton, but that's as far as that goes and even that is a stretch because Assange doesn't care if /all/ the governments in the nation fail.

They are selectively showing corruption. They didn't show any of the RNC attempts to derail the Trump candidacy or the attempt at changing the convention rules. They only showed things that made Hillary and the Democrats look bad. That's propaganda not corruption.

And much of what the Russian Troll farmers like Mind Wars here posts is false or misleading. Especially the anti-Clinton stuff.

Assange hates Hillary Clinton. Always has. He's deranged on the topic.
 
It doesn't matter if Russian's are feeding them information, what matters is that /none/ of the information they've put out has been proven fake. They're showing corruption because that's what they do - anarchists who want to take down corrupt leaders, nothing more. If the information came from criminals, they'd post it, if it came from rapists, they'd post it, and if it comes from the enemies of whatever country, yeah, they'll post it. ANY evidence of corruption that shows up to them, and checks out, is going to be posted - that is what whistleblowers do and why they're considered to be in a "grey" legal area.

Wikileaks is not media, they're an anarchist group, they're active all over the world and are "against" every nation's government in the world - including Putin; a shit ton of the "bad shit" and "corruption" you know about him actually comes from Assange because he wanted to stop Putin from gaining power in Russia. Assange failed there because the Russian people wanted Putin - same as he failed to impress with his personal opinion that Trump was a moron and shouldn't (in fact, "wouldn't be allowed to") be elected, the people didn't heed his advice there either. If you actually pay attention to what Assange says, rather than the carefully cherry picked bullshit the media feeds you, you'll see that he's got no "nation allies," only fellow 'hactivists' who feed him information. It's a bunch of watchdog private investigators who dig up shit, leak shit, and steal shit in a quasi-illegal effort to show the world how horrible everyone in power is. Assange, at best, kind of directs shit in whom he is going to out; I 'might' buy the idea that he sat on some info about Trump because he wanted Trump more than Clinton, but that's as far as that goes and even that is a stretch because Assange doesn't care if /all/ the governments in the nation fail.

They are selectively showing corruption. They didn't show any of the RNC attempts to derail the Trump candidacy or the attempt at changing the convention rules. They only showed things that made Hillary and the Democrats look bad. That's propaganda not corruption.

And much of what the Russian Troll farmers like Mind Wars here posts is false or misleading. Especially the anti-Clinton stuff.

Assange hates Hillary Clinton. Always has. He's deranged on the topic.

Clearly you didn't read it all:

Quote - Assange, at best, kind of directs shit in whom he is going to out; I 'might' buy the idea that he sat on some info about Trump because he wanted Trump more than Clinton, but that's as far as that goes and even that is a stretch because Assange doesn't care if /all/ the governments in the nation fail.
 
"What does make a difference is political accountability, a general deterrence set to stop political organizations [MY organization vs your organization = USA] behaving in a 'corrupt' manner. That can make a difference, because that changes the perception of what you can do or not do. And so, always—well, almost always, you should choose the principled position, which is to set a disciplinary signal about acting in a corrupt way, and take a philosophical position, which is our institutions can only be as good as our understanding of our institutions."




:rolleyes: MR CORRUPT CRIMINAL julian assange says a WHOLE LOT of nothing right there ^
 
US calls Assange 'enemy of state'

US Vice-President labelled Mr Assange a "high-tech terrorist" in December 2010 and US congressional leaders have called for him to be charged with espionage.

Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee - both once involved in presidential campaigns - have both urged that Mr Assange be "hunted down".

Mr Assange's US attorney, Michael Ratner, said the designation of WikiLeaks as an "enemy" had serious implications for the WikiLeaks publisher if he were to be extradited to the US, including possible military detention.

US Army private Bradley Manning faces a court martial charged with aiding the enemy - identified as al-Qaeda - by transmitting information that, published by WikiLeaks, became available to the enemy.

Under US law it would most likely have been considered criminal for the US Air Force analyst to communicate classified material to journalists and publishers, but those journalists and publishers would not have been considered the enemy or prosecuted.
 
"What does make a difference is political accountability, a general deterrence set to stop political organizations [MY organization vs your organization = USA] behaving in a 'corrupt' manner. That can make a difference, because that changes the perception of what you can do or not do. And so, always—well, almost always, you should choose the principled position, which is to set a disciplinary signal about acting in a corrupt way, and take a philosophical position, which is our institutions can only be as good as our understanding of our institutions."




:rolleyes: MR CORRUPT CRIMINAL julian assange says a WHOLE LOT of nothing right there ^

... Allow me to break that down for you dear, since you don't seem to understand it.

He's saying that R's and D's are both corrupt assholes controlled by corporations so it doesn't matter if the US elects Clinton or Trump; the corporations will still run the show. He believes that his organization (Wikileaks) is doing the "principled" thing by outing corruption in the hopes that the "threat" of outing might curb it. Rather like you "threaten" criminals with jail time if they steal, or you "threaten" to make someone pay legal fees for frivolous lawsuits. He thinks that corrupt individuals; be they politicians or CEO's/BoD's, will hesitate to do bad shit if they know they're being watched. That's the general idea of watchdog organizations.
 
outing corruption... stop the fucking presses. my corruption is better than your corruption. :uhoh3:
 
US calls Assange 'enemy of state'

US Vice-President labelled Mr Assange a "high-tech terrorist" in December 2010 and US congressional leaders have called for him to be charged with espionage.

Sarah Palin and Mike Huckabee - both once involved in presidential campaigns - have both urged that Mr Assange be "hunted down".

Mr Assange's US attorney, Michael Ratner, said the designation of WikiLeaks as an "enemy" had serious implications for the WikiLeaks publisher if he were to be extradited to the US, including possible military detention.

US Army private Bradley Manning faces a court martial charged with aiding the enemy - identified as al-Qaeda - by transmitting information that, published by WikiLeaks, became available to the enemy.

Under US law it would most likely have been considered criminal for the US Air Force analyst to communicate classified material to journalists and publishers, but those journalists and publishers would not have been considered the enemy or prosecuted.

Actually Manning is a good one to bring up. Obama pardoned him/her because as I already said, whistleblowers are a kind of gray area.
 
it wasn't actually an act of corruption but i didn't agree with it.
 
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange responded to Hillary Clinton’s claim that his organisation was a “subsidiary of Russian intelligence” by asserting that “there’s something wrong” with the former presidential candidate.

Julian Assange: “There’s Something Wrong With Hillary Clinton”



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Clintons and Obama's are the most crooked dirty pos losers . They've mislead people and it is saddening to see so many who dump their hearts into these two losers who see them as nothing but slaves who make them money. Psychological warfare works extremely well on those who have no understanding of it whatsoever which makes them easy, easy victims.


MindWars

Post a link.

Stop lying and just post a link.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top