Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I asked you a question, bitch!Damn, you truly are a dumb ass motherfucker.
I am not arguing like a liberal, I am a concerned citizen who realizes that we have a corrupt government. I don't trust it and it has not given me a reason to trust it. Again the government will put anything as classified to cover their tracks, Fast and the furious was classified. It's the same old thing peoples lives were at stake because information from fast and the furious was released. Shrillary was right and wrong depending on what was disclosed.Nope.
Not that your "question" has anything to do with what I had just posted.
It's not good to argue like a liberal. You should consider checking that.
But, in any event, I don't trust the unchecked "judgment" of shitbirds like Julian Assange, either.
And if he considers it some significant moral imperative to violate the Espionage Act or the like, then perhaps he ought to be man enough to do so in the open. Challenge it in Court. Face the consequences of his behavior.
Are you (or is anybody else) so sure that Shrillary was wrong when she said that the disclosures put people's lives and our national security at risk? How? Basis?
Was it Assange's right to take those risks? Who granted him that authority and power? I sure as hell didn't.
It's anyone's right to keep track of what the government does, and without people like Assange's it would be impossible to do so.
No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I am not arguing like a liberal, I am a concerned citizen who realizes that we have a corrupt government. I don't trust it and it has not given me a reason to trust it. Again the government will put anything as classified to cover their tracks, Fast and the furious was classified. It's the same old thing peoples lives were at stake because information from fast and the furious was released. Shrillary was right and wrong depending on what was disclosed.
It's anyone's right to keep track of what the government does, and without people like Assange's it would be impossible to do so.
No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
I can understand that. But at least YOU (although we disagree on this point) can formulate a position based on a logical thought process.
It's not that the misdeeds of the government should be allowed to be swept under a rug by the cheesy expedient of calling it "classified."
It's that there are ways to go about revealing such (alleged) governmental misdeeds which either put the whistle blower in a relatively safe and secure position but also protects the legitimate interests of State secrecy OR which at least make the whistle blower accountable for his/her behavior.
If the shit pulled by the self-appointed asshats like Assange had to go unpunished, the government would effectively lose ANY ability to keep necessary secrets -- secret, This is why the self-appointed unauthorized shit-birds like Assange get no respect or credence from me -- and should get no lesser attention from the DoJ.
Make that cockbite accountable.
Can't answer, can you? Because you have an un-defendable position. There is no law you can claim, no incident you can site, that would justify attacking people bringing care to the wounded.No need to sign your posts with the formal "bitch."
Everyone sees you as the motherfucking bitch you are already.
And no, you motherfucking, cockgobbling, jism-guzzling whore, you asked a mindless fake question.
As I then noted, "Damn, you truly are a dumb ass motherfucker."
Now go pound some Fire-AIDS up your colon, you diseased rat twat.
Person's taking no part in hostilities are protected persons, bitch-boy!Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva, 12 August 1949.
Art. 3. In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each Party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:
(1) Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.
(2) The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.
Under no circumstances may they be the target of attack. However, you can clearly see in the video, they are.Art. 16. The wounded and sick, as well as the infirm...shall be the object of particular protection and respect.
As far as military considerations allow, each Party to the conflict shall facilitate the steps taken to search for the killed and wounded...and to protect them against pillage and ill-treatment.
Art. 17. The Parties to the conflict shall endeavour to conclude local agreements for the removal from besieged or encircled areas, of wounded, sick, infirm...and for the passage of ...medical personnel and medical equipment on their way to such areas.
Art. 18. Civilian hospitals organized to give care to the wounded and sick, the infirm and maternity cases, may in no circumstances be the object of attack but shall at all times be respected and protected by the Parties to the conflict.
No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
I can understand that. But at least YOU (although we disagree on this point) can formulate a position based on a logical thought process.
It's not that the misdeeds of the government should be allowed to be swept under a rug by the cheesy expedient of calling it "classified."
It's that there are ways to go about revealing such (alleged) governmental misdeeds which either put the whistle blower in a relatively safe and secure position but also protects the legitimate interests of State secrecy OR which at least make the whistle blower accountable for his/her behavior.
If the shit pulled by the self-appointed asshats like Assange had to go unpunished, the government would effectively lose ANY ability to keep necessary secrets -- secret, This is why the self-appointed unauthorized shit-birds like Assange get no respect or credence from me -- and should get no lesser attention from the DoJ.
Make that cockbite accountable.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
I can understand that. But at least YOU (although we disagree on this point) can formulate a position based on a logical thought process.
It's not that the misdeeds of the government should be allowed to be swept under a rug by the cheesy expedient of calling it "classified."
It's that there are ways to go about revealing such (alleged) governmental misdeeds which either put the whistle blower in a relatively safe and secure position but also protects the legitimate interests of State secrecy OR which at least make the whistle blower accountable for his/her behavior.
If the shit pulled by the self-appointed asshats like Assange had to go unpunished, the government would effectively lose ANY ability to keep necessary secrets -- secret, This is why the self-appointed unauthorized shit-birds like Assange get no respect or credence from me -- and should get no lesser attention from the DoJ.
Make that cockbite accountable.
And everyone who was exposed as criminal by a whistleblower ? Are you just as concerned that they are held accountable- not for just the act but also the cover up ?
I can understand that. But at least YOU (although we disagree on this point) can formulate a position based on a logical thought process.
It's not that the misdeeds of the government should be allowed to be swept under a rug by the cheesy expedient of calling it "classified."
It's that there are ways to go about revealing such (alleged) governmental misdeeds which either put the whistle blower in a relatively safe and secure position but also protects the legitimate interests of State secrecy OR which at least make the whistle blower accountable for his/her behavior.
If the shit pulled by the self-appointed asshats like Assange had to go unpunished, the government would effectively lose ANY ability to keep necessary secrets -- secret, This is why the self-appointed unauthorized shit-birds like Assange get no respect or credence from me -- and should get no lesser attention from the DoJ.
Make that cockbite accountable.
And everyone who was exposed as criminal by a whistleblower ? Are you just as concerned that they are held accountable- not for just the act but also the cover up ?
You sweep with a very very broad brush, and your question becomes unfocused because of it.
Assange's re-distribution of classified material is a criminal act. The whistle-blower is the one who reveals it to Assange -- or the whistle-blowers are the ones who do so.
THEY may have a "reason" for doing so. The nominal "reason" may be noble and all that good stuff. Perhaps not.
But when a shit-bird like Assange just makes it an unedited mass document dump, he couldn't be any more clear that he is indifferent to consequences. If deaths are caused by his improper disclosures, what's that to him? If America's security is compromised in ANY way, what's that to hm?
If the criminal acts of some people are revealed based on the unlawful disclosure, then maybe it's proper to go after those alleged law-breakers. Or, perhaps, prosecutors who are an arm of the government in some ways may feel duty bound not to proceed for reasons to which you and I might not be privy.
Either way, though, the call is NOT Assanges' to make.
And everyone who was exposed as criminal by a whistleblower ? Are you just as concerned that they are held accountable- not for just the act but also the cover up ?
You sweep with a very very broad brush, and your question becomes unfocused because of it.
Assange's re-distribution of classified material is a criminal act. The whistle-blower is the one who reveals it to Assange -- or the whistle-blowers are the ones who do so.
THEY may have a "reason" for doing so. The nominal "reason" may be noble and all that good stuff. Perhaps not.
But when a shit-bird like Assange just makes it an unedited mass document dump, he couldn't be any more clear that he is indifferent to consequences. If deaths are caused by his improper disclosures, what's that to him? If America's security is compromised in ANY way, what's that to hm?
If the criminal acts of some people are revealed based on the unlawful disclosure, then maybe it's proper to go after those alleged law-breakers. Or, perhaps, prosecutors who are an arm of the government in some ways may feel duty bound not to proceed for reasons to which you and I might not be privy.
Either way, though, the call is NOT Assanges' to make.
Maybe he should have disclosed it in the form of a TV mini-series so Americans could understand it. Maybe some subtitles along with it so people would know how to interpret it.
Got forbid we get hit with a load of raw facts.
Oh do you? I have a hell of a problem with losing 2/3 of the American population due to a war Assange's pantywaist endeavors throw in our lap.I am not arguing like a liberal, I am a concerned citizen who realizes that we have a corrupt government. I don't trust it and it has not given me a reason to trust it. Again the government will put anything as classified to cover their tracks, Fast and the furious was classified. It's the same old thing peoples lives were at stake because information from fast and the furious was released. Shrillary was right and wrong depending on what was disclosed.
It's anyone's right to keep track of what the government does, and without people like Assange's it would be impossible to do so.
No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
Oh do you? I have a hell of a problem with losing 2/3 of the American population due to a war Assange's pantywaist endeavors throw in our lap.No. When you come back with silly shit like "you really trust the government" in response to what I had posted and trusting government has nothing to do with what I had said, then you ARE indeed arguing exactly like a liberal.
I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
The people have a right to know what its government is doing in their name. Especially, if what its doing, is illegal.Despite the efforts of some misguided trollish ignorant dip shits to praise that scum bag, Julian Assange, the reality is:
Assange was busy making decisions that were not his to make, breaking laws to do it and overtly indifferent to who could get hurt as a consequence of his illegal and unauthorized behavior.
I do hope he gets captured and that the DoJ prosecutes him to the fullest extent of the law.
Despite the efforts of some misguided trollish ignorant dip shits to praise that scum bag, Julian Assange, the reality is:
Assange was busy making decisions that were not his to make, breaking laws to do it and overtly indifferent to who could get hurt as a consequence of his illegal and unauthorized behavior.
I do hope he gets captured and that the DOJ prosecutes him to the fullest extent of the law.
Despite the efforts of some misguided trollish ignorant dip shits to praise that scum bag, Julian Assange, the reality is:
Assange was busy making decisions that were not his to make, breaking laws to do it and overtly indifferent to who could get hurt as a consequence of his illegal and unauthorized behavior.
I do hope he gets captured and that the DOJ prosecutes him to the fullest extent of the law.
How is it illegal for informing the people about truth of matters? I bet Oliver North would be a major republican today had he informed the people about the dubious activities the US government was involved in during the Iran/Iraq war.
As per running: I wish Julian Assange would make appearances in courts and defend himself. While the man made has gotten into some personal acts he should have known better to avoid, I still think Julian Assange is been hunted because of Wikileaks.
You will see there are military compromises Assange handed over to terrorists in his "expose" of "evil" American government when the traitor's trial brings it out. His betrayal of our information got our informants in Afghanistan murdered. Those indeed were military classified secrets being passed out by a traitor in our military. You have been misled, and there's nothing I can do about it except tell what little I know of this from reading things in the press that have been omitted and shut down until the trial brings it back to the light of day.Oh do you? I have a hell of a problem with losing 2/3 of the American population due to a war Assange's pantywaist endeavors throw in our lap.I wasn't trying to be silly, I was being very sincere I have more problem with the government keeping secrets than those secrets being revealed.
I never said military secrets. those are separate from government secrets such as what Assang leaked out.
