Julian Assange, info terrorist or government transparency hero?

They aren't legit classified documents, so who gives a shit who gives them to the media. Giving guns to drug gangs isn't classified, except for the informants we might use.

The act itself isn't classified, especially after the entire plan is exposed for killing a US agent.

Oh, the irony dumbfuck. :lol:

Your messiah and Holder are hiding F&F documents from Congress in the name of "national security" and White House secret correspondence....to cover up their crimes.

Covering up crimes, is not legal. So you just indicted Obamination, idiot.

Which is why the govt needs to be careful what it calls national security. If every time they fuck up they hide behind that as an excuse, then they have gone past their mandate and deserve what they get...

He is not my hero..

And isn't it funny that if by some quirk of fate Assange did find these Fast and Furious documents, and published them online, you'd give him congressional medal of honor..
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

It might be illegal but it has been done.
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...

Different program done under the working knowledge of the Mexican Government. obama's program was not.
 
Ahh, the fucking moron shows up.

The Bush program tracked the guns sent across the border, whereas ATF agents under Obamination were told to let the guns walk without being tracked.

Idiots like you should be locked away because you come here every day telling lies based on ignorance or being a scumbag that ignores the facts.

Oh, I don't recall any investigation by Pelosi and Reid on what Bush did with his gun programs.....:eusa_whistle:

It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...
 
You don't want to use F&F as your example because whistle blowers did contact Congress which set in motion the court case and lawsuits against Holder.

Eventually Holder and Obamination are going to take it up the ass in 2013 over this F&F bullshit either as an impeached POTUS or as citizens waiting for the FBI to arrest them at their private homes for crimes against the US and Mexico.

It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

It might be illegal but it has been done.
 
Ahh, the fucking moron shows up.

The Bush program tracked the guns sent across the border, whereas ATF agents under Obamination were told to let the guns walk without being tracked.

Idiots like you should be locked away because you come here every day telling lies based on ignorance or being a scumbag that ignores the facts.

Oh, I don't recall any investigation by Pelosi and Reid on what Bush did with his gun programs.....:eusa_whistle:

It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...

an insane loon calling me a moron is pretty funny.

you're simply a liar. and a hypocrite. you are so full of hatred that you can't even write the president's name. it's obama since spelling it seems to be a problem for you.

like i said.. .you have zero credibility

but feel free to keep on sucking up cheap booze and ranting and raving from the comfort of your basement.

and if a crime had been committed, loony toon, don't you think the teatards in the House would have already drafted articles of impeachment?
 
Like I said, you're a dumb piece of shit.

Yeah, Obamination just claimed Executive Privilege for the hell of it after Congres demanded all the documents Holder has been hiding for over a year....but that is all explained away in your fucked up head because Obamination said a year earlier he had no clue about F&F. :badgrin:

Shut the fuck up, nutjob.

Ahh, the fucking moron shows up.

The Bush program tracked the guns sent across the border, whereas ATF agents under Obamination were told to let the guns walk without being tracked.

Idiots like you should be locked away because you come here every day telling lies based on ignorance or being a scumbag that ignores the facts.

Oh, I don't recall any investigation by Pelosi and Reid on what Bush did with his gun programs.....:eusa_whistle:

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...

an insane loon calling me a moron is pretty funny.

you're simply a liar. and a hypocrite. you are so full of hatred that you can't even write the president's name. it's obama since spelling it seems to be a problem for you.

like i said.. .you have zero credibility

but feel free to keep on sucking up cheap booze and ranting and raving from the comfort of your basement.

and if a crime had been committed, loony toon, don't you think the teatards in the House would have already drafted articles of impeachment?
 
Ahh, the fucking moron shows up.

The Bush program tracked the guns sent across the border, whereas ATF agents under Obamination were told to let the guns walk without being tracked.

Idiots like you should be locked away because you come here every day telling lies based on ignorance or being a scumbag that ignores the facts.

Oh, I don't recall any investigation by Pelosi and Reid on what Bush did with his gun programs.....:eusa_whistle:

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...

an insane loon calling me a moron is pretty funny.

you're simply a liar. and a hypocrite. you are so full of hatred that you can't even write the president's name. it's obama since spelling it seems to be a problem for you.

like i said.. .you have zero credibility

but feel free to keep on sucking up cheap booze and ranting and raving from the comfort of your basement.

and if a crime had been committed, loony toon, don't you think the teatards in the House would have already drafted articles of impeachment?

Over two thousand felonies were committed if you only charge one person int hat case. Add just one person and there were many involved....Add two thousand more. Obama hasnt been thrown under the bus because no one is in jail.,

But defend this corruption. It comes as an expectation from democrats.
 
Julian Assange - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A lot of mixed emotions about Assange/WikiLeaks. I read the entire link above & have formed an opinion. I would be interested in hearing your opinions about Assange & WikiLeaks.

Assange is innocent until proven guilty; he is entitled to a fair and impartial investigation. The question is: can that occur in such a charged political and emotional climate.

Many on the right seem more interested in Assange being made an ‘example of’ rather than due process.

Is there a venue where objective, documented evidence can be presented and examined in a fair and equally objective manner – at this point it would seem not.
 
Julian Assange - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A lot of mixed emotions about Assange/WikiLeaks. I read the entire link above & have formed an opinion. I would be interested in hearing your opinions about Assange & WikiLeaks.

Assange is innocent until proven guilty; he is entitled to a fair and impartial investigation. The question is: can that occur in such a charged political and emotional climate.

Many on the right seem more interested in Assange being made an ‘example of’ rather than due process.

Is there a venue where objective, documented evidence can be presented and examined in a fair and equally objective manner – at this point it would seem not.

Assange is presumed innocent in the eyes of the law until and unless proved guilty in a court of law. It is false and ignorant to claim NOW that he "is" innocent.

That aside, he's a fucking scum bag who has already acknowledged his role in disseminating classified materials.

Fuck him and this bullshit hypocrisy from all the liberal Democrat hacks, like Adam_Clayton.
 
Ahh, the fucking moron shows up.

The Bush program tracked the guns sent across the border, whereas ATF agents under Obamination were told to let the guns walk without being tracked.

Idiots like you should be locked away because you come here every day telling lies based on ignorance or being a scumbag that ignores the facts.

Oh, I don't recall any investigation by Pelosi and Reid on what Bush did with his gun programs.....:eusa_whistle:

an insane loon calling me a moron is pretty funny.

you're simply a liar. and a hypocrite. you are so full of hatred that you can't even write the president's name. it's obama since spelling it seems to be a problem for you.

like i said.. .you have zero credibility

but feel free to keep on sucking up cheap booze and ranting and raving from the comfort of your basement.

and if a crime had been committed, loony toon, don't you think the teatards in the House would have already drafted articles of impeachment?

Over two thousand felonies were committed if you only charge one person int hat case. Add just one person and there were many involved....Add two thousand more. Obama hasnt been thrown under the bus because no one is in jail.,

But defend this corruption. It comes as an expectation from democrats.

We can all play at being the partisan hack if you like. No wonder your country is stuffed. you're more concerned about cheap shots than making things better...
 
an insane loon calling me a moron is pretty funny.

you're simply a liar. and a hypocrite. you are so full of hatred that you can't even write the president's name. it's obama since spelling it seems to be a problem for you.

like i said.. .you have zero credibility

but feel free to keep on sucking up cheap booze and ranting and raving from the comfort of your basement.

and if a crime had been committed, loony toon, don't you think the teatards in the House would have already drafted articles of impeachment?

Over two thousand felonies were committed if you only charge one person int hat case. Add just one person and there were many involved....Add two thousand more. Obama hasnt been thrown under the bus because no one is in jail.,

But defend this corruption. It comes as an expectation from democrats.

We can all play at being the partisan hack if you like. No wonder your country is stuffed. you're more concerned about cheap shots than making things better...

No cheap shots there ....all factual.............It is a felony to transfer a firearm to a known felon. It occurred 2000 times. it gets much worse when intent is proven, that wont come out until people do jail time. This was funded by congress, slipped in by a democrat.

Know your facts before mouthing off.
 
You don't want to use F&F as your example because whistle blowers did contact Congress which set in motion the court case and lawsuits against Holder.

Eventually Holder and Obamination are going to take it up the ass in 2013 over this F&F bullshit either as an impeached POTUS or as citizens waiting for the FBI to arrest them at their private homes for crimes against the US and Mexico.

It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

It might be illegal but it has been done.

Oh but I do. I think it broke the news before it made it too congress.
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

It might be illegal but it has been done.

Which is exactly why we need whistleblowers. We aren't even close to knowing the whole truth about the financial disaster. Everyone's is paid off and too afraid to talk.
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

what criminal act?

was it criminal when bush ran the same program?

your credibility is zero...
Aiding criminals is a criminal act.
Bush didn't do it.
Classifying information to avoid accounting for a criminal act to Congress is illegal and grounds for impeachment.
Blaming Bush for a criminal act you did and he didn't do should get you 20 years of slammer time.
 
It is ILLEGAL to call something classified just to cover up a criminal act.

Obamination and Holder don't have a pot to pee in regarding F&F because Congress, which pays for the program, has the freakin security clearance to know EVERY DETAIL of the plans. So nobody can tell Congress members read into a program that they can't see the details of that program under Executive Privilege or whatever.....especially when Obamination a year before claimed he didn't know about it.

It might be illegal but it has been done.

Which is exactly why we need whistleblowers. We aren't even close to knowing the whole truth about the financial disaster. Everyone's is paid off and too afraid to talk.
A person who kills our informants in Afghanistan is not a whistleblower. He is an enemy of the people of the United States of America who lost part of our financial sector on 9/11 due to Muslim hatred that was partly responsible for the murder of 7,000,000 jews in WWII, as they inspired Hitler on getting rid of the European population of Jews to obtain wealth the Jewish people had accumulated by sacrifice and refusal to squander money on licentious pursuits to pay for his political ambitions.
 
It might be illegal but it has been done.

Which is exactly why we need whistleblowers. We aren't even close to knowing the whole truth about the financial disaster. Everyone's is paid off and too afraid to talk.
A person who kills our informants in Afghanistan is not a whistleblower. He is an enemy of the people of the United States of America who lost part of our financial sector on 9/11 due to Muslim hatred that was partly responsible for the murder of 7,000,000 jews in WWII, as they inspired Hitler on getting rid of the European population of Jews to obtain wealth the Jewish people had accumulated by sacrifice and refusal to squander money on licentious pursuits to pay for his political ambitions.

Draw long bows much?
 
It might be illegal but it has been done.

Which is exactly why we need whistleblowers. We aren't even close to knowing the whole truth about the financial disaster. Everyone's is paid off and too afraid to talk.
A person who kills our informants in Afghanistan is not a whistleblower. He is an enemy of the people of the United States of America who lost part of our financial sector on 9/11 due to Muslim hatred that was partly responsible for the murder of 7,000,000 jews in WWII, as they inspired Hitler on getting rid of the European population of Jews to obtain wealth the Jewish people had accumulated by sacrifice and refusal to squander money on licentious pursuits to pay for his political ambitions.

Since you mentioned Germany and Hitler, it's sad that their wasn't any whistle blowers back then that could have stopped Hitler. But their were probably some Germans who thought those people were traitors also.
 

Forum List

Back
Top