Julia Assange, like Bin Laden, is a false flag

katsung47

VIP Member
Nov 22, 2011
1,066
44
71
Bin Laden and Julian Assange, False flag and living plant (12/7/2010)

On 12/4, I wrote an article "Wiki-Leaks is another false flag" and posted it in APFN. One hour later, I was surprised to find the topic was replied by Julian Assange. I don't think it was Assange himself did it. He is on the run. Most likely it is the work of his handler - the Feds. The purpose is to link me to a would be "criminal". Assange is a living plant like Bin Laden. Here is the topic:


Wiki-Leaks is another false flag ?kathaksung, Sat Dec 4 09:27

* Thats not all, Netanyahu said.... ?Percy, Sat Dec 4 18:52

o Julian Assange answers your questions ?Julian Assange, Sat Dec 4 10:24

APFN - Wiki-Leaks is another false flag

Bin Laden is a living plant.

In 1990, Soviet bloc collapsed. US intelligence turned its resource which used to deal with Soviet bloc to the new target - Mid-east countries which are rich in natural resource. Bin Laden, an asset of the CIA in Afghanistan war(against Russian), was revived in this new project as a false flag - Islamic extremist. He went to Sudan first in 1991.

The Sudanese offered to arrest Bin Laden and extradite him to Saudi Arabia .

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize

Saudi and US didn't take the offer with various excuse because Bin Laden is a living plant they deployed there.

In 1995, Bin Laden tried to set up a connection with Saddam but was refused.

Exhaustive review finds no link between Saddam, al Qaida

A September 2006 report by the Senate Intelligence Committee concluded that Saddam was "distrustful of al Qaida and viewed Islamic extremists as a threat to his regime, refusing all requests from al Qaida to provide material or operational support."

The Senate report, citing an FBI debriefing of a senior Iraqi spy, Faruq Hijazi , said that Saddam turned down a request for assistance by bin Laden which he made at a 1995 meeting in Sudan with an Iraqi operative.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20080310/wl_mcclatchy/2875005

Sudan may have felt the danger to accomodate Bin Laden. In May 1996, the Sudanese asked bin Laden to leave. He went to Afghan and stay there until now.

In August 1998, Sudan and Afghanistan were bombed by US missiles.

In 2001, after 911, Afghan, facing US invasion, made an offer but failed.

Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
* Taliban demand evidence of Bin Laden's guilt

guardian.co.uk, Sunday 14 October 2001 22.19 BST

Political Forum, Live Political Chat and Blogs discussing political and social issues.

In Bin Laden's recent 20 years, the countries he went or tried to go, have something in common: They all have rich natural resources. Sudan and Iraq have oil. Afghan has rich mine. '

Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential
DUBAI | Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14pm
Afghanistan to develop $3 trillion in mining potential | Reuters

He didn't go to Yemen, Somali or Syria for his "revolution" because they are resource poor countries, not in US interest list. He didn't go to Saudi or Kuwait. Because they are US allies. He only went to Sudan, Afghan, or Iraq (intended to) because these three countries were not controlled by US at that time. As a living plant, he gave US the excuse to activate attack on these three countries. (Even Saddam realized that Bin Laden was a dangerous living plant and rejected him, Iraq at last was invaded with an unexisted WMD)

Julian Assange is another false flag and living plant. The target is not to control natural resource but to control the free speech kindom - the Internet. If you have noticed that in last month, the events come with the Wiki-leaks' third leaking. '

The 19 Senators Who Voted To Censor The Internet
from the free-speech-isn't-free dept

The 19 Senators Who Voted To Censor The Internet | Techdirt

US Government seizure of the internet has begun; DHS takes over 76 websites

Learn more: US Government seizure of the internet has begun; DHS takes over 76 websites

WIKILEAKS will leak 250.000 documents sunday nov 28
Sat Nov 27, 2010

APFN - WIKILEAKS will leak 250.000 documents sunday nov 28

What will be their next step? Feds will upgrade the secret level of the leaking document to their puppet Assange. That will finally justify the legitimate of control of the Internet. When you saw that Wiki-Leaks is moving from this server to that, this web site to other, do you realize all these sites could be potential victims of the next wave of Internet censorship and seizure? Assange does same thing Bin Laden has done.

I always say that I am the most wanted of the Feds. Though I am always under the surveillance of the Feds, to set up an internet communication with a "criminal" could justify their action and turn an unreasonable search into a reasonable one. On 12/5, (next day that Assange post reply to my article) A working van of "Direct TV" parked at my front door. Technician installed something in my neighbor's house. (we share one roof and the wall) I think that they were installing detective instrument. My neighbor has had a dish satellite antenna already.
 
Assange isn't 'on the run', you delusional freak. He's out on bail, in the UK. The whole of the UK knows exactly where he is.

Twit.
 
Assange isn't 'on the run', you delusional freak. He's out on bail, in the UK. The whole of the UK knows exactly where he is.

Twit.

How did you manage to narrow it down to one thing to point out as being stupid in the OP?

Well, I stopped reading when he lied about Assange. But you are correct.... cuz Osama's dead.... and the OP thinks he's a 'living plant'. He's a dead plant... seaweed. :lol:
 
julia2.jpg
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Here is what I wrote 14 months ago. I would say I correctly pointed out their purpose. Now US government even doesn't cover up their intention to wage a war on Iran.

Wikileaks is false-flag operation :)
#4 by kathaksung » Dec 06, 2010 8:38 pm



Wiki-Leaks is another false flag

1. It doesn't leak any important secret of dirty insiders of US government.

2. It provokes Iran and other Arab countries. (News that Saudi king asking US to attack Iran)

3. Feds let Assange go and release un-important documents like what Feds do to Bin Laden. Assange and Bin Laden won't be arrested until their mission being done.

4. This time the likely purpose is to justify war on Iran.

Quote, "WikiLeaks: Iran 'obtains North Korea missiles which can strike Europe'

Iran has obtained ballistic missiles from North Korea that could be used to strike Western Europe, the leaked files suggest.
By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent 29 Nov 2010 "

Wikileaks is false-flag operation :) : Conspiracy Theories • Rational Skepticism Forum
"
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Assange isn't 'on the run', you delusional freak. He's out on bail, in the UK. The whole of the UK knows exactly where he is.

Twit.

Please watch the date I wrote the article. It was Dec. 7, 2010. At that time, no body knew where Julian Assange was. The Interpol was looking for him. Assange reported to British police on Dec. 7th 2010, after my posting.

Here is a news of Dec.3rd 2010:

WikiLeaks: new diplomatic cables contain UFO details, Julian Assange says

By Andrew Hough
11:00PM GMT 03 Dec 2010

The Swedish authorities are also seeking Mr Assange over a charge of rape and sexual assault. Interpol has issued an international warrant for his arrest.

British police requested more information about the penalties Mr Assange could face if convicted, according to a statement on the Swedish Prosecution Authority's website.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...-contain-UFO-details-says-Julian-Assange.html

Do more research, less shout abusing.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top