Julia Ainsley obliterates Sarah Sanders report about the 4000 terrorists coming across the border

[Geaux4it]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

 

[Asclepias]

Before the crazy left starts dancing in the streets over some left wing blog that alleges that some unknown Ansley person "obliterated" the Press Secretary you have to define the term "terrorist. It's likely that among the ten million illegal immigrants that there genuine jihadists and genuine psychopathic criminals and it's possible that there are thousands of illegal immigrants who support the violent overthrow of the United States. There used to be a time when the crazy left embraced numbers like 4,000 terrorists but today it seems that left wing media personalities make more converts by downplaying the effect of illegal immigration.

"Likely" certainly doesnt prove any illegal immigrants support violent overthrow of the US. Youre pissing on your shoe and calling it rain.

We don't need proof

-Geaux

You do if you want a border wall. If you dont provide proof you wont get shit. Thats just the way it is bub.

Thats the way you want it to work, but he just needs to declare the National Emergency and get er done.

-Geaux

Thats exactly what I am hoping he does. That way it will get tied up in court and you rubes will have to prove it with facts.

 

[Asclepias]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

More proof? So far we have zero proof.

 

[Geaux4it]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

More proof? So far we have zero proof.

Where is the proof the illegals who are entering have tried to go through the front door? Where is THEIR proof?

-Geaux

 

[Asclepias]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

More proof? So far we have zero proof.

Where is the proof the illegals who are entering have tried to go through the front door? Where is THEIR proof?

-Geaux

Is that a rhetorical question? If not can you explain what you are talking about?

 

[Geaux4it]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

More proof? So far we have zero proof.

Where is the proof the illegals who are entering have tried to go through the front door? Where is THEIR proof?

-Geaux

Is that a rhetorical question? If not can you explain what you are talking about?

The questions are self explanatory.

-Geaux

 

[Asclepias]

What more proof does anyone need than what is out there. Why should we take all those illegals in who are not abiding with the process?

-Geaux

More proof? So far we have zero proof.

Where is the proof the illegals who are entering have tried to go through the front door? Where is THEIR proof?

-Geaux

Is that a rhetorical question? If not can you explain what you are talking about?

The questions are self explanatory.

-Geaux

The questions dont explain what they have to do with terrorism.

 

[peach174]

The wall is working ,but the established parties don't want it.

Let's not listen to what border patrol and people living near the Mexican border want.
They want the wall in certain areas.
They want more agents and more use of high tech surveillance .
We have been asking this for more than 20 years.
It's time to do it.
I'm glad Trump is demanding it of both parties, they have to stop delaying it.
Everybody is getting sick and tired of party over common sense policies.

How is the wall working when it isn't there?

It's working very well at the Tijuana border.

 

[Rustic]

It will be interesting to see if Trump tries to keep pedaling the lie about the 4000 non-existent terrorists who are coming across our southern border, when the new state department data base produced the actual numbers of suspected terrorists who were apprehended at airports. That number was "six". They weren't even apprehended at the border. Lol! "National emergency" my ass.

Trump's going on national television tomorrow to pedal a bunch of propaganda to his cult base, by bombarding them with the same lies they've been vomiting about the 4000 illegal terrorists. Chris Wallace schooled Sanders on Sunday about the 4000 terrorists that don't exist. Then, Julia Ainsley took her out to the woodshed today with Nicole Wallace and her program and confirmed the actual number. That number of six were people of interest to the state department. Have you ever in your life seen an administration so packed full of scum bag liars? And these are the people we look to to give us accurate reporting and honesty. And they want to talk about the "fake news media". Man, get out of here. These folks are all traitors to this country, because they are all about covering their asses for themselves. People, these folks are the worst of the worst.

Far more illegal aliens get across without getting caught than illegal aliens apprehended... that’s just a fact

 

[mudwhistle]

So the Drumpf administration is run by idiots like we've always thought? They cant fucking read a simple report and see that it wasnt the border?

She was likely pushing a mistaken talking point. Not as mistaken as the talking point the mainstream media pushed about it.

How do you fuck up a talking point that badly? What did the MSM say that was over the top?

By getting the statistical year incorrect. Pretty honest mistake.
MSM would not even consider that gaffe because they wanted to push their own intentionally false narrative.

Bullshit. They deliberately lied to confuse the rubes. They have an army of fact checkers no way they got the year wrong.

Since 4000 was accurate for 2017 they got the year wrong.

So it was accurate, but the statistics for 2018 were not posted yet. Since we are only into the third week of January 2019 and the government has been shut down since before Christmas, the press is using speculation to fact-check Sarah Sanders

 

[bullwinkle]

The wall is working ,but the established parties don't want it.

Let's not listen to what border patrol and people living near the Mexican border want.
They want the wall in certain areas.
They want more agents and more use of high tech surveillance .
We have been asking this for more than 20 years.
It's time to do it.
I'm glad Trump is demanding it of both parties, they have to stop delaying it.
Everybody is getting sick and tired of party over common sense policies.

How is the wall working when it isn't there?

It's working very well at the Tijuana border.

Peach, all seem to agree that there are places a wall (or Peaches or whatever) is effective. It is my understanding that last year about $1.6 bn was allocated and of that about $40 mil was spent on repairs but no new wall parts were installed, so evidently the need is not as great as promoted.