Judge orders Rep. Joe Walsh (R) to prove he doesn’t owe back child-support

Discussion in 'Politics' started by J.E.D, Sep 14, 2011.

  1. J.E.D
    Offline

    J.E.D What's tha matta?

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    10,904
    Thanks Received:
    1,774
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,576
    Self-appointed fiscal responsibility hawk and loudmouth, Rep Joe Walsh (R) has been ordered by a judge to prove that he does not owe his ex-wife $100,000 in child support. Looks like the hypocrite's chickens are coming home to roost. :lol::lol::lol:

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    what a scumbag
     
  3. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,576
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,220
    Perhaps he doesn't owe it. Shouldn't we wait to see whether he can prove his case before jumping to conclusions?

    However, he probably is.
     
  4. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,620
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,215
    Who cares and what difference does it make?
     
  5. J.E.D
    Offline

    J.E.D What's tha matta?

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2011
    Messages:
    10,904
    Thanks Received:
    1,774
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,576
    I care because Walsh has been running around bragging about how fiscally responsible he is, while simultaneously criticizing Obama and the Dems for (in his opinion) not being fiscally responsible. It's his own fault for being a loudmouthed hypocrite. You're damn right I'm going to call him out.
     
  6. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Nah, we're only supposed to want proof if it's a democrat. :lol:

    The left and their double standard. :lol:
     
  7. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    So, you have the proof that he hasn't paid? Or are you hanging him because he's a Republican?
     
  8. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
    well, i hope he paid.

    but.. in my experience, ex wives generally don't claim that they weren't paid when they were. it's too easy to prove otherwise with canceled checks and receipts. what you get more of are disputes money which was never paid, about how much the ex should pay for things. they fight over one or the others obligations to share expenses. but they generally don't fight too much about whether daddy has paid when he's written the checks. the major exception is when cash has been given. in that case, the parent who owes the money is going to have a problem anyway since they can't prove they paid.
     
  9. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,127
    Thanks Received:
    9,267
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,419
    I'm surprised there's no mention of a discovery hearing (at which neither party need be present).
    Proof of income and historical income is presented and the lawyers hash it out.

    Silly thread.
     
  10. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
    that doesn't exist in every state or in every type of proceeding.

    and in this particular case, i'm guessing the judge doesn't believe him or she would have said to provide the proof to his wife's lawyer.
     

Share This Page