Judge may dismiss Stormy's frivolous suit against Trump.

[koshergrl]

First Amendment, yo.

Judge nails it...and this is why the left is losing their minds over the fact that we are putting CONSTITUTIONAL JUDGES in place.

Not just in the Supreme Court, either.

"The question is whether the tweet by the president is protected communication or political hyperbole and non-defamatory on its face," U.S. District Judge James Otero said at a hearing on Monday.

"Otero cited certain protections from defamation Trump would have under the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of free-speech rights.

"He's a public official, he's president of the United States, so it doesn't get much higher than that," Otero said. "It's free speech by a public official on a matter of public concern."

Ouch. As I keep saying, the left is anti free speech. Per usual, they take the term "freedom of speech" and apply it to "lies about officials" "false criminal accusations" and "racketeering"....and then claim anybody who objects to those things is squashing their *free speech*. No, free speech is not criminal endeavor. They are different things.

Anyway, all these cretins are going down. Stormy's attorney is in hiding as we speak, and so is Ford.

U.S. judge suggests he may dismiss Stormy Daniels lawsuit against Trump

 

[Penelope]

You Trump would be well to remember that, freedom of speech and the press.

 

[koshergrl]

You Trump would be well to remember that, freedom of speech and the press.

Freedom of the press only applies to the press.
Not to criminals who are pretending to be *free press*.

And he's done nothing to interfere with their freedom, anyway. Freedom of the press doesn't mean the freedom to print lies, or harass, or lie about the president. Freedom of the press doesn't mean that they have unfettered access to his person for the purpose of harranguing and threatening him....while working with the enemies of our country, and taking money, for the purpose of creating and printing complete falsehoods.

 

[koshergrl]

And free speech is protected.
Libel, however, is a crime. So is consorting with the enemies of our people and our country for the purpose of destroying it, and them.

The left doesn't ever want us to place judges who will actually uphold the law, and the constitution. They are HORRIFIED of the law, because they are criminals. That is why they only want corrupt judges in places of power.

 

[BlindBoo]

Freedom of the press doesn't mean the freedom to print lies, or harass, or lie about the president.

Worked for Faux News between 2009 and 2017.

But as is typical for most all Chicken Shit Bullies, they can dish it out but they sure can't take it. This is especially true for the Trumpublicans. It's one of their defining characteristics.

 

[The Original Tree]

Avenatti already moved on to his next false accusation representing some drunken black out whore who can't remember where Kavanaugh exposed himself to her at, and neither can her classmates.

She only knew it was Kavanaugh after Avenatti convinced her that it was after 6 straight days of Assessing and Refining her Fake Allegation.

Failed Race Car Driver Turned Sleezeball Lawyer

 

[The Original Tree]

You Trump would be well to remember that, freedom of speech and the press.

Nobody can remember Nuthin No More.

Not even what year, or house you got raped in by Michael Avenatti.

 

[g5000]

Trump recently lost his battle against the First Amendment. He can no longer block people from following his Twitter account.

 

[DrLove]

Don't count your chickens yet

Otero stopped short of issuing a formal ruling on the request to dismiss the lawsuit. Michael Avenatti, an attorney for Daniels, told reporters outside court he expected Otero to make a ruling within days, and that he would appeal if the case were dismissed.

 

[g5000]

First Amendment, yo.

Judge nails it...

Trump unblocks more Twitter users after U.S. court ruling

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday unblocked some additional Twitter users after a federal judge in May said preventing people from following him violated individuals constitutional rights.

 

[The Original Tree]

Does anyone even know what the lawsuit is about?

She got paid to strip at a bachelor party at Trump Tower, and had to sign a nondisclosure agreement to get her money.

She ran out of money and wanted to get out of the non disclosure agreement which she had already violated prior to the court date.

She is libel for damages, and as far as I can tell, that is what the case was about. Her trying to weasel out of her agreement after she violated to avoid liability.

 

[The Original Tree]

First Amendment, yo.

Judge nails it...

Trump unblocks more Twitter users after U.S. court ruling

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday unblocked some additional Twitter users after a federal judge in May said preventing people from following him violated individuals constitutional rights.

So apparently you are opposed to your choice of your friends and followers on Social Media now?

Are you going to sue USMB for having an IGNORE button because everyone has you on IGNORE?

Exactly how is selecting which people are allowed to follow you on Social Media, blocking others on your accounts or blocking phone numbers on your cell phone, an attack on The 1st Amendment?

You mean The Blocking Feature on Twitter, Facebook and other Social Media Accounts is now illegal?

That ruling no doubt handed down by a Libtard Activist will get overturned, just like all your other bullshit Anti Freedom Anti American Ruling handed down my your Marxist Masters.

 

[koshergrl]

Trump recently lost his battle against the First Amendment. He can no longer block people from following his Twitter account.

So it must be a violation of the First Amendment for Twitter to block people from Twitter.

We agree.

 

[g5000]

First Amendment, yo.

Judge nails it...

Trump unblocks more Twitter users after U.S. court ruling

U.S. President Donald Trump on Tuesday unblocked some additional Twitter users after a federal judge in May said preventing people from following him violated individuals constitutional rights.

So apparently you are opposed to your choice of your friends and followers on Social Media now?

Are you going to sue USMB for having an IGNORE button because everyone has you on IGNORE?

Exactly how is selecting which people are allowed to follow you on Social Media, blocking others on your accounts or blocking phone numbers on your cell phone, an attack on The 1st Amendment?

You mean The Blocking Feature on Twitter, Facebook and other Social Media Accounts is now illegal?

That ruling no doubt handed down by a Libtard Activist will get overturned, just like all your other bullshit Anti Freedom Anti American Ruling handed down my your Marxist Masters.

False analogy, retard.

You should have read the link, dipshit. But of course you didn't. It is longer than a tweet.

 

[g5000]

Trump recently lost his battle against the First Amendment. He can no longer block people from following his Twitter account.

So it must be a violation of the First Amendment for Twitter to block people from Twitter.

We agree.

Nice try. But you can't libel or slander people on Twitter or in a newspaper or on the radio or television or any other media.

Idiot.