Judeah and Samaria = West Bank!!

Roudy

Diamond Member
Mar 16, 2012
59,152
17,461
2,180
As San Jose = Saint Hussien. And let's not forget, Dearborn is now known as Al Darbourne. Ha ha ha!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B9sRg_5VeWA]Saint Hussein in California - YouTube[/ame]
 
As San Jose = Saint Hussien. And let's not forget, Dearborn is now known as Al Darbourne. Ha ha ha!

Saint Hussein in California - YouTube
I bet you Sunni man is from saint Hussein, Palestine USA! Ha ha ha
Hopefully, one day his mailing address will be Gitmo, Cuba.
e008c6b4e5883401127976bd3228a4-vi.jpg


ksmjk0.jpg
 
Perhaps someone can tell us how come the West Bank actually had the Hebrew and biblical name of Judeah and Samaria of Ancient Israel, for thousands of years up to the 1960's, which is when Arab invaders decided to change its name to West Bank? Was it to cleanse the name from it's from its Hebrew / Jewish origins?
 
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?




Perhaps someone can tell us how come the West Bank actually had the Hebrew and biblical name of Judeah and Samaria of Ancient Israel, for thousands of years up to the 1960's, which is when Arab invaders decided to change its name to West Bank? Was it to cleanse the name from it's from its Hebrew / Jewish origins?
 
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?




Perhaps someone can tell us how come the West Bank actually had the Hebrew and biblical name of Judeah and Samaria of Ancient Israel, for thousands of years up to the 1960's, which is when Arab invaders decided to change its name to West Bank? Was it to cleanse the name from it's from its Hebrew / Jewish origins?
Yeah, Muslims engaging in ethnic cleansing, changing names of Christian and Hebrew cities to Muslim sounding names, and changing Churches into Mosques? Gee that's so unusual!
 
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?




Perhaps someone can tell us how come the West Bank actually had the Hebrew and biblical name of Judeah and Samaria of Ancient Israel, for thousands of years up to the 1960's, which is when Arab invaders decided to change its name to West Bank? Was it to cleanse the name from it's from its Hebrew / Jewish origins?
Yeah, Muslims engaging in ethnic cleansing, changing names of Christian and Hebrew cities to Muslim sounding names, and changing Churches into Mosques? Gee that's so unusual!
Don't forget the beautiful Haghia Sophia church conquered by invadors and turned into a mosque.

"For almost 500 years the principal mosque of Istanbul, Hagia Sophia served as a model for many other Ottoman mosques, such as the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (Blue Mosque of Istanbul), the Şehzade Mosque, the Süleymaniye Mosque, the Rüstem Pasha Mosque and the Kılıç Ali Paşa Mosque."

Hagia Sophia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?
Yeah, Muslims engaging in ethnic cleansing, changing names of Christian and Hebrew cities to Muslim sounding names, and changing Churches into Mosques? Gee that's so unusual!
Don't forget the beautiful Haghia Sophia church conquered by invadors and turned into a mosque.

"For almost 500 years the principal mosque of Istanbul, Hagia Sophia served as a model for many other Ottoman mosques, such as the Sultan Ahmed Mosque (Blue Mosque of Istanbul), the Şehzade Mosque, the Süleymaniye Mosque, the Rüstem Pasha Mosque and the Kılıç Ali Paşa Mosque."

Hagia Sophia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Let's also remember what they did to the ancient Buddha Statues in Afghanistan. Ah, Islam, the most tolerant, peaceful religion:

Buddhas of Bamiyan
History of Afghanistan
The Buddhas of Bamiyan (Persian: بت های باميان* – but hay-e bamiyan) were two 6th century[1] monumental statues of standing buddhas carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley in the Hazarajat region of central Afghanistan, situated 230 km (140 mi) northwest of Kabul at an altitude of 2,500 meters (8,202 ft). Built in 507 AD, the larger in 554 AD,[1] the statues represented the classic blended style of Gandhara art.[2] They were dynamited and destroyed in March 2001 by the Taliban, on orders from leader Mullah Mohammed Omar,[4] after the Taliban government declared that they were "idols".[5] International opinion strongly condemned the destruction of the Buddhas, which was viewed as an example of the intolerance of the Taliban. Japan and Switzerland, among others, have pledged support for the rebuilding of the statues.[6]

Afghanistan's radical clerics began a campaign to crack down on "un-Islamic" segments of Afghan society. The Taliban soon banned all forms of imagery, music and sports, including television, in accordance with what they considered a strict interpretation of Sharia.[20] Information and Culture Minister Qadratullah Jamal told Associated Press of a decision by 400 religious clerics from across Afghanistan declaring the Buddhist statues against the tenets of Islam. "They came out with a consensus that the statues were against Islam," said Jamal.

The statues were destroyed by dynamite over several weeks, starting on March 2, 2001,[28] carried out in different stages. Initially, the statues were fired at for several days using anti-aircraft guns and artillery. This caused severe damage, but did not obliterate them. During the destruction, Taliban Information Minister Qudratullah Jamal lamented that, "this work of destruction is not as simple as people might think. You can't knock down the statues by shelling as both are carved into a cliff; they are firmly attached to the mountain."[29] Later, the Taliban placed anti-tank mines at the bottom of the niches, so that when fragments of rock broke off from artillery fire, the statues would receive additional destruction from particles that set off the mines. In the end, the Taliban lowered men down the cliff face and placed explosives into holes in the Buddhas.[30] After one of the explosions failed to completely obliterate the face of one of the Buddhas, a rocket was launched which left a hole in the remains of the stone head.[31] On 6 March 2001 The Times quoted Mullah Mohammed Omar as stating, "Muslims should be proud of smashing idols. It has given praise to God that we have destroyed them."[32] During a 13 March interview for Japan's Mainichi Shimbun, Afghan Foreign Minister Wakil Ahmad Mutawakel stated that the destruction was anything but a retaliation against the international community for economic sanctions: "We are destroying the statues in accordance with Islamic law and it is purely a religious issue".
 
Last edited:
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?




Perhaps someone can tell us how come the West Bank actually had the Hebrew and biblical name of Judeah and Samaria of Ancient Israel, for thousands of years up to the 1960's, which is when Arab invaders decided to change its name to West Bank? Was it to cleanse the name from it's from its Hebrew / Jewish origins?
Yeah, Muslims engaging in ethnic cleansing, changing names of Christian and Hebrew cities to Muslim sounding names, and changing Churches into Mosques? Gee that's so unusual!

Don't forget changing the Arabic name of God in the bible from Elaha to Allah in order to better reflect the Quran
 
Are you suggesting the followers of peaceful Islam would do such a thing? Gosh, who woulda thunk it of them?
Yeah, Muslims engaging in ethnic cleansing, changing names of Christian and Hebrew cities to Muslim sounding names, and changing Churches into Mosques? Gee that's so unusual!

Don't forget changing the Arabic name of God in the bible from Elaha to Allah in order to better reflect the Quran
Allah was actually one of the many moon gods that the Meccans worshipped. Mohammad named god Allah to gain his own tribe's allegiance as a political move. That's how the crescent moon became one of the main symbols of Islam. That, and of course the SWORD or DAGGER. to remind everybody how peaceful Mohammad or Islam really is. Heh heh heh!
 
Don't forget the beautiful Haghia Sophia church conquered by invadors and turned into a mosque.
We should as well recall that blingy dome of the crock in Jerusalem is, actually, a byzantine church of St.Mary of Justinian, bastardized by arabs.
I'd prefer just leveling the Dome of CROCK due to its disrespect and for building it right on top of another faith's main holy site. Imagine if Jews or Christians built a big temple smack in the middle of Mecca?
 
The 'Land of Israel' Myth

In Egypt's Eighteenth Dynasty about 1300BC, Habiru nomadic tribesmen were taken to Egypt as forced labor on building projects. During the reign of Ramesses II (1304-1237BC), Moses led twelve tribes--each believed to be descended from a great-grandson of Abraham--back to the Levant.

This became a revered tradition--the Exodus--among the Israelites, Moses's chosen people. While wandering they forged a collective faith and identity, and received Mosaic Law on Mount Sinai.

They then invaded the peaceful land of milk and honey, Canaan, with great slaughter.
map+Middle_East_Levant_map.png


This map of the southern Levant, c.830 BC, shows the multitude of small states that actually ruled the area.
The Philistine and Phoenician city-states, the kingdoms of Aram-Damascus, Ammon, Moab and Edom all existed during the time of David and Solomon, and for a long time after, but an Israeli propaganda map always has to show the wishful thinking of an aggressive state that then, as now, invaded all its neighbours.
Notes From A Small Island: The 'Land of Israel' Myth
 
This became a revered tradition--the Exodus--among the Israelites, Moses's chosen people. While wandering they forged a collective faith and identity, and received Mosaic Law on Mount Sinai. They then invaded the peaceful land of milk and honey, Canaan, with great slaughter.
We know, we know. That humanitarian bull joke is boring.
 
The 'Land of Israel' Myth

In Egypt's Eighteenth Dynasty about 1300BC, Habiru nomadic tribesmen were taken to Egypt as forced labor on building projects. During the reign of Ramesses II (1304-1237BC), Moses led twelve tribes--each believed to be descended from a great-grandson of Abraham--back to the Levant.

This became a revered tradition--the Exodus--among the Israelites, Moses's chosen people. While wandering they forged a collective faith and identity, and received Mosaic Law on Mount Sinai.

They then invaded the peaceful land of milk and honey, Canaan, with great slaughter.
map+Middle_East_Levant_map.png


This map of the southern Levant, c.830 BC, shows the multitude of small states that actually ruled the area.
The Philistine and Phoenician city-states, the kingdoms of Aram-Damascus, Ammon, Moab and Edom all existed during the time of David and Solomon, and for a long time after, but an Israeli propaganda map always has to show the wishful thinking of an aggressive state that then, as now, invaded all its neighbours.
Notes From A Small Island: The 'Land of Israel' Myth
Meh, since when does a bullshit blog from the Philippines count? Or are you terrorist worshippers getting that desperate?

From your link:

"Reports from Siargao Island, Philippines, plus posts about Israel when they do something outrageously criminal."

Wow, sounds pretty legitimate, doesn't it? Ha ha ha ha!
 
The two separate nations of Israel in the north with capital at Samaria, and Judah in the south with capital at Jerusalem, went downhill at separate rates.

Israel went into paganism first and God allowed them to be taken captive in two separate waves by the Assyrians.

The Israelites never returned.

I'm sorry, I'll read that again....

The Israelites never returned.

Judah worshipped God a little longer, but God sent the Babylonians to take them into captivity about 120 years after Israel. Some Jews returned after 70 years to rebuild Jerusalem.

But enough remained in Mesopotamia for Flavius Josephus, the Jewish historian, to say, 700 years later, about 100AD: "The ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers."

Around 200 BC some of the returned Jews lived as an autonomous people in the land of Israel, referred to, by most, as Judea, which at that time was controlled by the Seleucid king of Syria. The Jewish people paid taxes to Syria and accepted its legal authority, and by and large were free to follow their own faith, maintain their own jobs, and engage in trade.

By 175 BC Antiochus IV Epiphanes ascended to the Seleucid throne. At first little changed, but under his reign, the Temple in Jerusalem was looted, Jews were massacred, and Judaism was effectively outlawed. In 167 BC Antiochus ordered an altar to Zeus erected in the Temple.
The king may have been intervening in an internal civil war between the traditionalist Jews in the country and the Hellenized elite Jews in Jerusalem. These competed violently over who would be the High Priest, with traditionalists with Hebrew/Aramaic like Onias overthrown by Hellenizers with Greek names like Jason and Menelaus. As the conflict escalated, Antiochus took the side of the Hellenizers by prohibiting the religious practices the traditionalists had rallied around. This may explain why the king, in a total departure from Seleucid practice in all other places and times, banned the traditional religion of a whole people.
from my previous link
 
The two separate nations of Israel in the north with capital at Samaria, and Judah in the south with capital at Jerusalem, went downhill at separate rates.

Israel went into paganism first and God allowed them to be taken captive in two separate waves by the Assyrians.

The Israelites never returned.

I'm sorry, I'll read that again....

The Israelites never returned.

Judah worshipped God a little longer, but God sent the Babylonians to take them into captivity about 120 years after Israel. Some Jews returned after 70 years to rebuild Jerusalem.

But enough remained in Mesopotamia for Flavius Josephus, the Jewish historian, to say, 700 years later, about 100AD: "The ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers."

Around 200 BC some of the returned Jews lived as an autonomous people in the land of Israel, referred to, by most, as Judea, which at that time was controlled by the Seleucid king of Syria. The Jewish people paid taxes to Syria and accepted its legal authority, and by and large were free to follow their own faith, maintain their own jobs, and engage in trade.

By 175 BC Antiochus IV Epiphanes ascended to the Seleucid throne. At first little changed, but under his reign, the Temple in Jerusalem was looted, Jews were massacred, and Judaism was effectively outlawed. In 167 BC Antiochus ordered an altar to Zeus erected in the Temple.
The king may have been intervening in an internal civil war between the traditionalist Jews in the country and the Hellenized elite Jews in Jerusalem. These competed violently over who would be the High Priest, with traditionalists with Hebrew/Aramaic like Onias overthrown by Hellenizers with Greek names like Jason and Menelaus. As the conflict escalated, Antiochus took the side of the Hellenizers by prohibiting the religious practices the traditionalists had rallied around. This may explain why the king, in a total departure from Seleucid practice in all other places and times, banned the traditional religion of a whole people.
from my previous link
Your previous link was filled with lies and historical errors. It's a websites dedicated to Jew hatred with hundreds of articles about Jews this and Jews that.

You Jew hating IslamoNazi dirtbags get attracted to sites like this like flies to shit.
 
The two separate nations of Israel in the north with capital at Samaria, and Judah in the south with capital at Jerusalem, went downhill at separate rates.

Israel went into paganism first and God allowed them to be taken captive in two separate waves by the Assyrians.

The Israelites never returned.

I'm sorry, I'll read that again....

The Israelites never returned.

Judah worshipped God a little longer, but God sent the Babylonians to take them into captivity about 120 years after Israel. Some Jews returned after 70 years to rebuild Jerusalem.

But enough remained in Mesopotamia for Flavius Josephus, the Jewish historian, to say, 700 years later, about 100AD: "The ten tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude, and not to be estimated by numbers."

Around 200 BC some of the returned Jews lived as an autonomous people in the land of Israel, referred to, by most, as Judea, which at that time was controlled by the Seleucid king of Syria. The Jewish people paid taxes to Syria and accepted its legal authority, and by and large were free to follow their own faith, maintain their own jobs, and engage in trade.

By 175 BC Antiochus IV Epiphanes ascended to the Seleucid throne. At first little changed, but under his reign, the Temple in Jerusalem was looted, Jews were massacred, and Judaism was effectively outlawed. In 167 BC Antiochus ordered an altar to Zeus erected in the Temple.
The king may have been intervening in an internal civil war between the traditionalist Jews in the country and the Hellenized elite Jews in Jerusalem. These competed violently over who would be the High Priest, with traditionalists with Hebrew/Aramaic like Onias overthrown by Hellenizers with Greek names like Jason and Menelaus. As the conflict escalated, Antiochus took the side of the Hellenizers by prohibiting the religious practices the traditionalists had rallied around. This may explain why the king, in a total departure from Seleucid practice in all other places and times, banned the traditional religion of a whole people.
from my previous link
Your previous link was filled with lies and historical errors. It's a websites dedicated to Jew hatred with hundreds of articles about Jews this and Jews that.

You Jew hating IslamoNazi dirtbags get attracted to sites like this like flies to shit.
Even more interesting is people's responses to this garbage article, found on the same website:

Worden said... "Mark Cohen, Norman Stillman, Uri Avnery, M. Klien and Bernard Lewis opine that antisemitism in pre-modern Islam is rare..." This is pure propaganda. Here's some facts: Iran:"In 1656, all Jews were expelled from Isfahan because of the common belief of their impurity and forced to convert to Islam." Yemen: "Under the Zaydi rule, the Yemenite Jews were considered to be impure..." and so on. Iraq: "There was a massacre of Jews in Baghdad in 1828." Syria: "In 1840, the Jews of Damascus were falsely accused of having murdered a Christian monk..." And so on. Here you go History of the Jews under Muslim rule - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jews in Arab Lands: Introduction and Readings Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here's some statistics: In the early 19th cent. there were about 1 million Jews in the whole of ME, including Turkey. By the 1850, there were only 1/2 million. In the 1880s, this number slightly increased and there were about 600 thousands. Note that in Anti-semitic Russian Empire, with persecution, Pale of Settlement, pogroms and all, the numbers were: 800 000 in the early 19th cent. 3 million about 1850s. 5 million in the late 19th cent.

It seems that harsh Russian conditions were paradise compared to the tolerant Muslim world. Indeed, persecutions in Morocco and Yemen surpassed all that Russian Jews saw. See pogroms in Morocco and life of dhimmis in Yemen.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top