Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers "should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting"

[jillian]

shouldn't the same apply to Juanita, then?

Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers 'should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting'

you mean Juanita who gave a sworn statement that she was never molested and Kenny boy Starr threatened her?

she already was given a vetting....she lied or Kenny boy would have been desperate to use her.

you can move on now.

 

[jillian]

shouldn't the same apply to Juanita, then?

Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers 'should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting'

what makes you think it hasn't happened to her and that is perhaps the reason she wants trumps accusers to go through the same thing...in other words, maybe she thinks like you do...would you like trump accusers to go through the same thing she has gone through no matter what it was?

is that you, Senator Franken?

you mean senator franked who's so-called accuser doesn't want an ethics investigation? that senator franked?

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

The tape is public record and was submitted to the courts and the media you stupid little fuck.

Goddamn, are you stoopid as a box of deformed pez dispensers.

If it's public record, the tapes would be part of the ....dun dun dun...

PUBLIC RECORD!!! If it was submotted to the courts and the media -- we'd be able ...dun dun dun...

HEAR IT FOR OURSELVES.

WHERE'S THE FUCKING TAPES DUDE???

WHERE ARE THEY??

You haven't even come close to producing ANYTHING close.

"You have been provided a full transcript and an article confirming that the tape was leaked to the press."

^ It's looks like you just may overtake bripat, the middle finger toddler of USMB, as one of the stupidest posters here. It's a pretty high bar, considering the competition, but you just may do it.

Excelsior!

You have been provided the full transcript and an article confirming that the tape was leaked to the press it was 20 years ago the audio is not on the internet you stupid little bitch.

OMG, he's going for it.

Again you are a laughable fuck the full transcript is available online, a cursory google search reveals the tape is cited in numerous articles, it is from 20 years ago when mp3's were in their infancy so the audio is not on the internet you rape supporting POS.

 

[JoeB131]

Again you are a laughable fuck the full transcript is available online, a cursory google search reveals the tape is cited in numerous articles, it is from 20 years ago when mp3's were in their infancy so the audio is not on the internet you rape supporting POS.

If this tape existed, there would be no problem transcribing it.

So one can only conclude it doesn't exist.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

shouldn't the same apply to Juanita, then?

Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers 'should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting'

what makes you think it hasn't happened to her and that is perhaps the reason she wants trumps accusers to go through the same thing...in other words, maybe she thinks like you do...would you like trump accusers to go through the same thing she has gone through no matter what it was?

is that you, Senator Franken?

you mean senator franked who's so-called accuser doesn't want an ethics investigation? that senator franked?

No the Senator Franken caught on camera sexually assaulting an unconscious woman you disgusting rape apologist.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Again you are a laughable fuck the full transcript is available online, a cursory google search reveals the tape is cited in numerous articles, it is from 20 years ago when mp3's were in their infancy so the audio is not on the internet you rape supporting POS.

If this tape existed, there would be no problem transcribing it.

So one can only conclude it doesn't exist.

I provided the full transcription and it has been cited in numerous books and articles as a cursory google search reveals you apologist POS.

 

[jillian]

shouldn't the same apply to Juanita, then?

Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers 'should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting'

what makes you think it hasn't happened to her and that is perhaps the reason she wants trumps accusers to go through the same thing...in other words, maybe she thinks like you do...would you like trump accusers to go through the same thing she has gone through no matter what it was?

is that you, Senator Franken?

you mean senator franked who's so-called accuser doesn't want an ethics investigation? that senator franked?

No the Senator Franken caught on camera sexually assaulting an unconscious woman you disgusting rape apologist.

he wasn't touching her in that picture you insane twit.

and again., she doesn't want him to resign and doesn't want to appear at any ethics hearing.

it was a drive by smear on behalf of her buddy hannity./

now worry about your sexual predator in the White House and the child moldester running for the senate. because a stupid picture is NOT the same thing.

but I do love how men are the ones pushing that. no sane woman would think it's the same and frankly it's an insult to women to pretend they are the same thing.

 

[JoeB131]

No the Senator Franken caught on camera sexually assaulting an unconscious woman you disgusting rape apologist.

So he did this without touching her while she was wearing armor.

As opposed to how she normally dressed at that time?

Help, help, I'm being harassed. Or maybe the check just bounced!

 

[JoeB131]

I provided the full transcription you stupid fuck.

Okay, so where's the audio recording. Because anyone can write up a "transcript".

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

he wasn't touching her in that picture you insane twit.

Lying rape apologist scum one can clearly see the fabric under his right hand is scrunched. You are such a disgusting human being (and I use that term loosely) that for partisan political reasons you will defend groping the breasts of unconscious women despite photographic proof.

and again., she doesn't want him to resign and doesn't want to appear at any ethics hearing.

Lying rape apologist.

it was a drive by smear on behalf of her buddy hannity./

A smear with photographic evidence? You're fucked in the head you crazy bitch.

now worry about your sexual predator in the White House and the child moldester running for the senate. because a stupid picture is NOT the same thing.

These claims were not made until after both men won their respective primaries and both of whom were in the spotlight for decades, which is a tried and true tactic of the sick demented left.

but I do love how men are the ones pushing that. no sane woman would think it's the same and frankly it's an insult to women to pretend they are the same thing.

You're an insult to women and are likely a victim of sexual abuse yourself who now identifies with abusers, that is the only rational explanation for why you are a clear cut supporter of rape, sexual assault of unconscious women, and a victim blaming degenerate, seek help you sick demented POS.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

I provided the full transcription you stupid fuck.

Okay, so where's the audio recording. Because anyone can write up a "transcript".

Omfg are you fucking illiterate? The tape itself is cited in numerous articles and books as well, but it was from 20 years ago when mp3s were in their infancy so it's not on the internet.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

So he did this without touching her while she was wearing armor.

Lying scum, the fabric under his right hand is clearly scrunched. And for the record what is the precise fabric thickness required before it becomes acceptable to grope an unconscious woman's breasts?

As opposed to how she normally dressed at that time?

Help, help, I'm being harassed. Or maybe the check just bounced!

Look at this sick rape apologist victim blaming piece of shit who claims she was asking for it because of how she dressed, you are a disgusting subhuman kill yourself.

 

[JoeB131]

Lying rape apologist scum one can clearly see the fabric under his right hand is scrunched.

Um, that's a kevlar best. It doesn't "Scrunch".

 

[JoeB131]

Omfg are you fucking illiterate? The tape itself is cited in numerous articles and books as well, but it was from 20 years ago when mp3s were in their infancy so it's not on the internet.

It's cited in numerous articles from nutjob websites... but until we hear an audio recording, it doesnt' exist.

Hey' there's a transcript from when Eisenhower met the aliens at Area 51, too! Doesn't mean it happened.

 

[JoeB131]

Look at this sick rape apologist victim blaming piece of shit who claims she was asking for it because of how she dressed, you are a disgusting subhuman kill yourself.

Dude, when you make your money selling your sexuality, and dressing like a stripper, you really don't have any business claiming you are being sexually harrassed.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

shouldn't the same apply to Juanita, then?

Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers 'should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting'

you mean Juanita who gave a sworn statement that she was never molested and Kenny boy Starr threatened her?

she already was given a vetting....she lied or Kenny boy would have been desperate to use her.

you can move on now.

She gave that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and was on tape prior to the affidavit admitting to the rape.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Look at this sick rape apologist victim blaming piece of shit who claims she was asking for it because of how she dressed, you are a disgusting subhuman kill yourself.

Dude, when you make your money selling your sexuality, and dressing like a stripper, you really don't have any business claiming you are being sexually harrassed.

You're a sick victim blaming POS you are literally saying she was asking for it, fuck you rape apologist.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Omfg are you fucking illiterate? The tape itself is cited in numerous articles and books as well, but it was from 20 years ago when mp3s were in their infancy so it's not on the internet.

It's cited in numerous articles from nutjob websites... but until we hear an audio recording, it doesnt' exist.

Hey' there's a transcript from when Eisenhower met the aliens at Area 51, too! Doesn't mean it happened.

National Review is not a nut job website and neither is the Observer gfys moron.

 

[jamesduncan]

The Founding Fathers designed impeachment for someone exactly like Donald Trump

https://tinyurl.com/ya2ebmf5

It Is Time To Talk Impeaching Trump

1. to accuse (a public official) before an appropriate tribunal of misconduct in office.

Pathological lying is a form of “misconduct in office” making it an impeachable offence

Dump is a pathological liar and that is NOT what we want as our President.
We, the citizens of this great Nation must act NOW
What say you, fellow Americans-?

Pathological lying (also called pseudologia fantastica and mythomania) is a behavior of habitual or compulsive lying.[1][2] It was first described in the medical literature in 1891 by Anton Delbrueck.[2] Although it is a controversial topic,[2] pathological lying has been defined as "falsification entirely disproportionate to any discernible end in view, may be extensive and very complicated, and may manifest over a period of years or even a lifetime".[1] Individuals may be aware they are lying, or may believe they are telling the truth

Psychotherapy appears to be one of the only methods to treat a person suffering from pathological lying. No research has been performed regarding the use of pharmaceutical medication to treat pathological liars
.............................................

Impeachment is the process by which a legislative body formally levels charges against a high official of government. Impeachment does not necessarily mean removal from office; it is only a formal statement of charges, akin to an indictment in criminal law, and is thus only the first step towards removal. Once an individual is impeached, he or she must then face the possibility of conviction via legislative vote, which then entails the removal of the individual from office.

Presidential Impeachment Process

Presidential Impeachment is a two stage Constitutional process. The full power of Impeachment and the removal of a sitting President resides within Congress. The actual impeachment of a President is the sole power of the House of Representatives. Once a President is impeached, the power of removing the President shifts to the U.S. Senate.

The House of Representatives starts the impeachment process by publicly investigating the charges and holding hearings. If the House of Representatives votes against impeachment the process is over and the President is not Impeached.

If the House of Representatives votes for Impeachment of the President, the process moves forward with the drawing up of the Articles of Impeachment (The official criminal charges for removal from office). The President has now been officially impeached per the United States Constitution. Once the Impeachment process is final, trials are then held in the U.S. Senate to convict or acquit the President of the Articles of Impeachment drawn against him.


*****NOTE: As of November 19, 2017 Articles of Impeachment have been drawn up against Trump

Trump could also be charged with obstruction of justice

b.t.w. 30 days in jail would bring him back down to earth as well

.....................

It Is Time To Talk Impeachment


Do you agree--?

 

[JoeB131]

She gave that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward and was on tape prior to the affidavit admitting to the rape.

The tape no one can produce apparently.

National Review is not a nut job website and neither is the Observer gfys moron.

Actually, those are my definition of racist, nutter websites. Especially the NR< which had Bill Kristol still insisting the Iraq War was a great idea after it went to shit.