Juanita Broaddrick: Trump accusers "should bear investigation, scrutiny and vetting"

Let's see....on the one side is you, sleaze....on the other:

Sorry, one columnist expressing an opinion doesn't represent the whole publication...

So one more time, how does anyone changing their opinion erase the fact that Broaderick has changed her story several times and cannot recall important details like the date or room number where this happened?
 
And you leftist stooges can't figure out why you think your Goddess Clinton is so innocent, hasn't lied, hasn't sold you out lmfao. Hasn't raped ( Bill) gawd no wonder she said your all losers easy to manipulate..

View attachment 162623


I kinda liked this....

"In Mrs. Clinton’s America, spiritual inspiration exists to pursue redistributive materialism, all “progress” apart from a little doughty self-help is the result of state intervention, the state has a practically unlimited right and duty to correct meritocratic as well as inherited or exploitive socioeconomic imbalances, and the U.S. Democratic party must be a secular church militant where those who oppose abortions (about half the American public) are, along with many other large groups, unwelcome.

This isn’t really Christianity or democracy; it easily slips into rank acquisition of votes with the money of part of the electorate in a cynical and corrupt manner..."
Mrs. Clinton Convicts Herself In Stunning Display of Rage At What Happened in 2016 - The New York Sun


Ever notice the leftist seem to fall for the CIA propaganda as being truthful information. No matter how much proof you put in front of them proving it's a lie it goes right over their heads . The left just can't take off the rose colored glasses they think their Gov. loves and cares for them so much that they aren't capable of doing such evil things upon humanity. Oh if they only saw the truth.
 
And you leftist stooges can't figure out why you think your Goddess Clinton is so innocent, hasn't lied, hasn't sold you out lmfao. Hasn't raped ( Bill) gawd no wonder she said your all losers easy to manipulate..

View attachment 162623


I kinda liked this....

"In Mrs. Clinton’s America, spiritual inspiration exists to pursue redistributive materialism, all “progress” apart from a little doughty self-help is the result of state intervention, the state has a practically unlimited right and duty to correct meritocratic as well as inherited or exploitive socioeconomic imbalances, and the U.S. Democratic party must be a secular church militant where those who oppose abortions (about half the American public) are, along with many other large groups, unwelcome.

This isn’t really Christianity or democracy; it easily slips into rank acquisition of votes with the money of part of the electorate in a cynical and corrupt manner..."
Mrs. Clinton Convicts Herself In Stunning Display of Rage At What Happened in 2016 - The New York Sun


Ever notice the leftist seem to fall for the CIA propaganda as being truthful information. No matter how much proof you put in front of them proving it's a lie it goes right over their heads . The left just can't take off the rose colored glasses they think their Gov. loves and cares for them so much that they aren't capable of doing such evil things upon humanity. Oh if they only saw the truth.


One can only conclude that the indoctrination is indelible......


....at least for the weak minded.
 
Let's see....on the one side is you, sleaze....on the other:

Sorry, one columnist expressing an opinion doesn't represent the whole publication...

So one more time, how does anyone changing their opinion erase the fact that Broaderick has changed her story several times and cannot recall important details like the date or room number where this happened?


OK, sleaze.....

I'll provide the explanation directly from left-leaning Slate Magazine....they you can just go away:



"Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.)

She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred."
Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?
 
No, Eyewitness testimony would be that they watched Clinton Rape her, not that she said later he raped her. I'm sorry this basic concept eludes you.

That is inaccurate dipshit, they were contemporaneous witnesses to the victims state of mind and physical condition following the rape, that is not hearsay, you don't know what you're talking about so don't play lawyer with me pal.


Well, no.

Well yes because Steele was charged because she lied to federal investigators and gave them 3 separate you dumbfuck:

Hold That Martyrdom

McDougal refused to answer any questions. She excercised her fifth amendment rights. Starr threw her in jail anyway.

There is no 5th amendment right to not answer questions that could not in amyway implicate oneself she didn't exercise her rights she was in contempt of court.

The fact is, she swore out two affadavits to the Jones legal team that she had never had sex with Clinton.

No the fact is she didn't want to come forward and lied when she was forced too, and she was on tape twice stating she was a rape victim prior to Kenneth Starr entering the picture, your claims are debunked bullshit so go screw.

NO prosecutor would go to court with a witness with a story that changed so much.

Juanita Broaderick was a liar. When she lied and what she lied about isn't that important.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer.
 
Juanita Brodderick was a liar 20 years ago and she's a liar now.
women lie about rape?

some do.

Brodderick clearly did.

She said he didn't, then she said he did. One of those statement is a lie.

Possibly both of those statements are lies. (She had a consensual relationship with Clinton, then lied about it, then told Ken Starr whatever he wanted to hear because she didn't want to go to jail like Susan McDougal.)

But in most places, you change your story like that, you don't have credibility.

You have less credibility when you can't recall the date, the room number, and were documented as attending events for your attacker for years afterwards.
If she were claiming an R raped her, you would believe 100%.
Not with her sworn affidavit saying she wasn't.
 
Juanita Brodderick was a liar 20 years ago and she's a liar now.
women lie about rape?

some do.

Brodderick clearly did.

She said he didn't, then she said he did. One of those statement is a lie.

Possibly both of those statements are lies. (She had a consensual relationship with Clinton, then lied about it, then told Ken Starr whatever he wanted to hear because she didn't want to go to jail like Susan McDougal.)

But in most places, you change your story like that, you don't have credibility.

You have less credibility when you can't recall the date, the room number, and were documented as attending events for your attacker for years afterwards.
If she were claiming an R raped her, you would believe 100%.
Not with her sworn affidavit saying she wasn't.


1. Had it not been for Trump's election....none of this would be happening!
With Hillary running, the whole rape-apologist program of the Democrats came to the the forefront....and they had to pretend that Trump was on the same level (the gutter) as Bill 'the rapist' Clinton.

Here's the 'divide:' the Democrats with at least a double digit IQ are ready to admit the truth, the rape history that the Right has been revealing about Clinton for...what....decades.

You, a total dunce, are still fighting the war you've lost.

2. Which Liberal outlets are now admitting what we on the Right have said for decades?

The New York Times

MSNBC

The Atlantic

Slate


Vox

3. On the other side....lying low-life imbeciles.....who are invested in the Clintons and the Democrats....who can't keep up with the program.
 
...
No the fact is she didn't want to come forward and lied when she was forced too, and she was on tape twice stating she was a rape victim prior to Kenneth Starr ....

The tapes that never materialized?

Not one person has verified she said any such thing on any tape, the only person who made that claim was Clinton hater Yoakam.

Next time: try harder.
 
Compared to Trump's canoodling with the Russian, Bill Clinton looks like nothing more than a fraternity brat.
 

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
LOLOL

Suuure, uh-huh.

Too bad she swore Bill didn't rape her.

"During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family." ~ Juanita Broaddrick
 

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
LOLOL

Suuure, uh-huh.

Too bad she swore Bill didn't rape her.

"During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family." ~ Juanita Broaddrick

Once again she was on tape prior to that affidavit stating she had been raped and she lied on that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward but was forced to do so.
 

It should and it did, it is a proven fact that Bill Clinton is a rapist:


Juanita Broaddrick’s claim was supported by not one but fivewitnesses and a host of circumstantial (though no physical) evidence. Broaddrick’s colleague Norma Rogers, who was attending the conference in Little Rock with her, says she found Broaddrick in her hotel room crying and “in a state of shock” on the morning of the alleged assault, her pantyhose torn and her lip swollen. According to Rogers, Broaddrick told her that Bill Clinton had “forced himself on her.”

At the time, Broaddrick (then Juanita Hickey) was having an affair with David Broaddrick, who would become her second husband. David Broaddrick told Dateline NBC that he remembers Juanita’s arriving home with a swollen lip and telling him that she had been assaulted by Bill Clinton.

And three other friends — Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Norma Rogers’s sister Jean Darden — all maintain that Broaddrick told them about the rape, too. (Rogers and Darden stand by their stories but have pointed out that they have an apparent conflict of interest: As governor, Clinton commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father.)

Two small details lend particular credence to Broaddrick’s story.

First, the lip. In 1998, after previously denying any such rumors, actress Elizabeth Gracen admitted to having a one-night stand with Bill Clinton in 1982. She claimed that, during rough sexual intercourse, Clinton bit her lip.

Second, in an account of the assault given to the Wall Street Journal and published shortly before her NBC interview, Broaddrick made the peculiar claim that Clinton told her she need not worry about becoming pregnant. He was sterile, he said, from a childhood case of mumps. Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

All of this evidence — far more than was ever present in the Anita Hill case — was available in 1999. But Hillary Clinton kept silent. And she may have intimidated Broaddrick into silence.


Juanita Broaddrick: Hillary's Ghost

All of that is hearsay, and two of the "Witnesses" you mention had a grudge against Clinton because he commuted the sentence of the guy who killed their father.

The thing is, Broaddrick has told three different version of this story.

1) Clinton never touched her.
2) Clinton touched her, but Hillary didn't know about it.
3) Clinton touched her, and Hillary intimidated her.

As a rule, when you change your story multiple times, you aren't telling the truth.

You are a rape supporter and victim blamer the evidence that Bill Clinton raped her is undeniable and the fact that she tried everything she could to stay out of the spotlight and never sought a penny speaks volumes.
LOLOL

Suuure, uh-huh.

Too bad she swore Bill didn't rape her.

"During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family's privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family." ~ Juanita Broaddrick

Once again she was on tape prior to that affidavit stating she had been raped and she lied on that affidavit because she didn't want to come forward but was forced to do so.
Why are you so dense???

You've been told already NO tapes ever materialized.

Not one person has verified she said any such thing on any tape, the only person who made that claim was Clinton hater Yoakam.


Next time: try even harder.

You really suck at this.
 
Clinton's sworn enemy: I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

Normal people: OK, produce them.

Clinton's sworn enemy: What are you? Crazy?

Look, you're just going to have to take my word on this:
<runs with scissors> I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!
 
Gennifer Flowers, who in 1992 claimed to have had a twelve-year sexual relationship with Clinton in the 1970s and 1980s, and Dolly Kyle Browning, who claims a three-decade affair with Bill, both told The Weekly Standard that Clinton told them he had a fertility problem. And in his book Blood Sport, James Stewart reported that Bill and Hillary “contemplated a visit to a doctor at the University of California” in the late 1970s, because they were worried that they could not conceive.

If Billy bob horndog was sterile, who the hell is Chesea's dad?
 
Clinton's sworn enemy: I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

Normal people: OK, produce them.

Clinton's sworn enemy: What are you? Crazy?

Look, you're just going to have to take my word on this:
<runs with scissors> I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

There were two tapes, the second was from Paula Jone's attorneys.
 
Clinton's sworn enemy: I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

Normal people: OK, produce them.

Clinton's sworn enemy: What are you? Crazy?

Look, you're just going to have to take my word on this:
<runs with scissors> I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

There were two tapes, the second was from Paula Jone's attorneys.
You're so fucked up, you can't even keep track of your own lies.

You said: "Sorry pal but she was secretly taped not once but twice stating she was raped prior to Kenn Starr..."

Where are the "tapes," birdbrain?
 
Clinton's sworn enemy: I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

Normal people: OK, produce them.

Clinton's sworn enemy: What are you? Crazy?

Look, you're just going to have to take my word on this:
<runs with scissors> I have tapes!
I have tapes!I have tapes!
I have tapes!

There were two tapes, the second was from Paula Jone's attorneys.
You're so fucked up, you can't even keep track of your own lies.

You said: "Sorry pal but she was secretly taped not once but twice stating she was raped prior to Kenn Starr..."

Where are the "tapes," birdbrain?

The Paula Jones tapes were prior to Kenn Starr and her Affidavit as well:


At about the same time, independent counsel Kenneth Starr subpoenaed Ms. Jones’ lawyers for information about Mrs. Broaddrick. She had signed an affidavit in the case, denying any unwelcome advances from Mr. Clinton. Mr. Starr wanted to know whether her affidavit, like Monica Lewinsky’s, was false. He knew that Rick Lambert had taped the conversation on the porch with a recorder concealed in his coat. This was “very underhanded,” Mrs. Broaddrick told me, but she does not hold it against the Lamberts. “They were just doing their job.”

That tape was leaked to the press. “A select group of us were given an audiotape,” one reporter said. But those who wanted to report it “were thwarted by their editors.”



NBC’s Vetting of Juanita Broaddrick: Clinton’s Accuser Discusses Agonizing Weeks as NBC Dragged It Out

Here is a full transcript of said tape:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0AXQQFggmMAA&usg=AOvVaw3M--EOUcxWv0DnQLkIFm0T

In it she also acknowledges the Yoakum recording.
 
Last edited:
OK, sleaze.....

I'll provide the explanation directly from left-leaning Slate Magazine....they you can just go away:

That same article had arguments on both sides...

But the problem still remains. She changed her story several times, and didnt have key details. YOu know, things that could be verified, like dates.

Hearsay evidence and changing stories without verification. This is not a strong case.

The only person who has had a consistent story here is Clinton.
 

Forum List

Back
Top