Joy Behar, Typical Dhimmicrat says 'I'd Vote for a Rapist as Long as they Are Liberals'

[JimBowie1958]

What a stupid ....nm, this essplains why Dhimmicrats are so willing to import Muslim rapists and criminals into our country.

The View's Joy Behar: I’d Vote for a Rapist as Long as They’re Liberal

The View’s Joy Behar on Tuesday insisted that, regardless of whether Bill Clinton raped a woman or Ted Kennedy drowned someone, she would vote for these liberal politicians. Behar and her fellow co-hosts were discussing how Clinton’s past would impact his wife. She justified, “Republicans have voted against the Violence Against Women Act. Now, that to me, is more important than anything that Bill Clinton did or didn't do because it's what [Hillary's] going to vote for.”

This came after co-host Paula Faris reminded, “Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey. They say that he [Clinton] either exposed himself to them, raped them or groped them.” Behar conceded, “He is a dog. Let’s face it.” She later declared, “But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.”

Well, give her this: She was honest. We could use more of that.

This is an example of what dogmatic adherence to an ideology does. Partisan ideologues specifically turn a blind eye to behaviors of those on their "side".

It's dishonest, it's hypocritical, and more people are doing it. At least this one admits it.
.

So how do classic liberals ever regain control of the Dhimmicrats?

Well, I think the same problem applies to both parties. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

To answer your question, I have no freakin' idea. We're still in the "it's getting worse" phase. It's still expanding.

The answer will have to come from "leaders" who are brave enough to blow the whistle on the whole thing. I don't see any right now.
.

I think we need to stop ostracizing our political opposites so much and instead use a 'cropping' approach and shun the extremes of both wings.

To the left I would define the unacceptable extreme as the Marxist left, who is more intent on causing mayhem and bringing about conditions that let them introduce the Dictatorship of the Proletariate, and to the right those who think that the government cannot take ANY action for the public's welfare.

Both are unable to compromise and work with the other side, and to save our nation we have to withdraw the welcome mat to them.

This requires an accurate assessment, and the extremes are good at keeping things obscured and confused.

 

[JimBowie1958]

What a stupid ....nm, this essplains why Dhimmicrats are so willing to import Muslim rapists and criminals into our country.

The View's Joy Behar: I’d Vote for a Rapist as Long as They’re Liberal

The View’s Joy Behar on Tuesday insisted that, regardless of whether Bill Clinton raped a woman or Ted Kennedy drowned someone, she would vote for these liberal politicians. Behar and her fellow co-hosts were discussing how Clinton’s past would impact his wife. She justified, “Republicans have voted against the Violence Against Women Act. Now, that to me, is more important than anything that Bill Clinton did or didn't do because it's what [Hillary's] going to vote for.”

This came after co-host Paula Faris reminded, “Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey. They say that he [Clinton] either exposed himself to them, raped them or groped them.” Behar conceded, “He is a dog. Let’s face it.” She later declared, “But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.”

Well, give her this: She was honest. We could use more of that.

This is an example of what dogmatic adherence to an ideology does. Partisan ideologues specifically turn a blind eye to behaviors of those on their "side".

It's dishonest, it's hypocritical, and more people are doing it. At least this one admits it.
.

So how do classic liberals ever regain control of the Dhimmicrats?

Classic liberals are not Democrats and have no intention of regaining control of the D Party. The Democrat party is now socialist and fascist. Classic liberals are libertarians and we have absolutely nothing in common with Democrats.

FYI - The D party never was a classic liberal party.

I think Jim Webbs decision to leave the Dhimmicratic party is the final straw to moderates having any more influence in the Dhimmicratic PArty, much less actual conservatives.

 

[JimBowie1958]

This is why I separate liberals from libtards. A real liberal would never say some crazy shit like that, but an ideological moron would, thus the word 'libtard'.

While Hillary can't tell you the difference between a Democrat and a Socialist, I can't tell the difference between a Liberal and a Libtard.

A liberal believes in free speech and the democratic process. A libtard is a Marxist ideologue who will lie, cheat and swindle to win, and who loves dictators like Castro and Chavez.

 

[Mac1958]

What a stupid ....nm, this essplains why Dhimmicrats are so willing to import Muslim rapists and criminals into our country.

The View's Joy Behar: I’d Vote for a Rapist as Long as They’re Liberal

The View’s Joy Behar on Tuesday insisted that, regardless of whether Bill Clinton raped a woman or Ted Kennedy drowned someone, she would vote for these liberal politicians. Behar and her fellow co-hosts were discussing how Clinton’s past would impact his wife. She justified, “Republicans have voted against the Violence Against Women Act. Now, that to me, is more important than anything that Bill Clinton did or didn't do because it's what [Hillary's] going to vote for.”

This came after co-host Paula Faris reminded, “Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey. They say that he [Clinton] either exposed himself to them, raped them or groped them.” Behar conceded, “He is a dog. Let’s face it.” She later declared, “But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.”

Well, give her this: She was honest. We could use more of that.

This is an example of what dogmatic adherence to an ideology does. Partisan ideologues specifically turn a blind eye to behaviors of those on their "side".

It's dishonest, it's hypocritical, and more people are doing it. At least this one admits it.
.

So how do classic liberals ever regain control of the Dhimmicrats?

Well, I think the same problem applies to both parties. The lunatics have taken over the asylum.

To answer your question, I have no freakin' idea. We're still in the "it's getting worse" phase. It's still expanding.

The answer will have to come from "leaders" who are brave enough to blow the whistle on the whole thing. I don't see any right now.
.

I think we need to stop ostracizing our political opposites so much and instead use a 'cropping' approach and shun the extremes of both wings.

To the left I would define the unacceptable extreme as the Marxist left, who is more intent on causing mayhem and bringing about conditions that let them introduce the Dictatorship of the Proletariate, and to the right those who think that the government cannot take ANY action for the public's welfare.

Both are unable to compromise and work with the other side, and to save our nation we have to withdraw the welcome mat to them.

This requires an accurate assessment, and the extremes are good at keeping things obscured and confused.

Logistically, this would require some amount of "leaders" (political, cultural, religious, whatever) to be brave enough to stand up and challenge their "side" to look in the mirror and admit its own faults and weaknesses, and to clean its own house before it points the finger at the other side. Then a momentum would need to begin and continue until it becomes cultural.

That's literally a potentially career-ending risk to take, that's why it would take bravery. The people who could make a difference are out there, they just haven't spoken up. Yet.
.

 

[Stephanie]

now who said politics for a liberal wasn't their Religion?

she speaks for a typical liberal