BakshisMouse
Rookie
- Jun 28, 2011
- 702
- 70
- 0
- Banned
- #61
Were you not public school educated, by chance?
No. I went to Catholic school assbrain.
It sure made you into a critical thinking non-idiot, that's for sure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Were you not public school educated, by chance?
No. I went to Catholic school assbrain.
You have a serious comprehension problem. I did not assert Romney said we shouldn't hire police officers. He said we should not hire MORE police officers.
Jesus, you are dense.
I'd prefer the FED stay the hell out of way.
“He says we need more firemen, more policemen, more teachers. Did he not get the message of Wisconsin? The American people did. It's time for us to cut back on government and help the American people.”
That's from the OP link. A quote from Romney, speaking about Obama.
If that is not a clear message that Romney wants to cut back on cops, then what is it?
Those are federal responsibilities? Really?
I'd prefer the FED stay the hell out of way.
There's nothing that says the federal government cannot offer aid to state and local governments.
^^^
Riddle me that!
That's from the OP link. A quote from Romney, speaking about Obama.
If that is not a clear message that Romney wants to cut back on cops, then what is it?
Those are federal responsibilities? Really?
Try reading a federal crime bill once in your life.
Not surprising considering that modern American Progressives come from a long line of Fascists like Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Fidel and the Jong Il's
I'd prefer the FED stay the hell out of way.
I agree.
We don't have any federally funded police, EMS, fire guys here.
All locally hired and funded.
This is really a non-issue anyhow - as Romney never made the statement the Lib-turds think they heard him say.
His statement is being used totally out of context by the left-winged moonbats.
If this is all they have on Romney, Obama needs to start packing.
Yesterday Mitt Romney claimed that it was “ completely absurd” of the Obama campaign to argue that he favors cutbacks in cops, firefighters and teachers. “The federal government doesn’t pay for teachers, firefighters or policemen,” Romney said, adding that they were paid by states and localities.
What’s getting lost in the back and forth here is that Romney’s actual economic plan would, in fact, cut billions of dollars in federal money that goes to cops, firefighters, and teachers — perhaps more than $10 billion a year, in fact.
As Michael McAuliff reported yesterday, despite Romney's claim, the federal government does give billions of dollars to states and localities through programs like Title 1, the COPS program, FEMA and others — which pay for first responders and teachers.
Romney’s plan calls for huge federal spending cuts, though it isn’t specific about which programs would get cut. But a reasonable set of assumptions for analyzing it shows Romney’s plan would cut deeply into those billions.
The Fiscal Year 2012 COPS Hiring Program (CHP) is now closed. Approximately $111 million in grant funding will be awarded later in FY 2012 for the hiring and rehiring of additional career law enforcement officers in an effort to create and preserve jobs and increase grantee community policing capacity and crime prevention efforts.
If you say that good construction projects can be made with grants from the federal government.
And you say that the FED should stay out of the way.
Couldn't you say the FED should stay out of the way and not grant you back your tax dollars?
I'd think they would have to get in your way to grant your tax dollars back to you.
If you say that good construction projects can be made with grants from the federal government.
And you say that the FED should stay out of the way.
Couldn't you say the FED should stay out of the way and not grant you back your tax dollars?
I'd think they would have to get in your way to grant your tax dollars back to you.
If you say that good construction projects can be made with grants from the federal government.
And you say that the FED should stay out of the way.
Couldn't you say the FED should stay out of the way and not grant you back your tax dollars?
I'd think they would have to get in your way to grant your tax dollars back to you.
The Fed - and you - can go fuck yourselves.
The Fed is not a revenue generator. They consume revenue.
What is it, in your mind, that you think the government actually produces?
If you say that good construction projects can be made with grants from the federal government.
And you say that the FED should stay out of the way.
Couldn't you say the FED should stay out of the way and not grant you back your tax dollars?
I'd think they would have to get in your way to grant your tax dollars back to you.
The Fed - and you - can go fuck yourselves.
The Fed is not a revenue generator. They consume revenue.
What is it, in your mind, that you think the government actually produces?
It just think it's hilarious that you're expressing implicitly that you have a right to your own taxed income.
When you got those grants for repairs, did you double check the grant didn't exceed what everyone payed in income taxes?
When the county got the grant, did they check that it didn't exceed taxes sent to the FED?The Fed - and you - can go fuck yourselves.
The Fed is not a revenue generator. They consume revenue.
What is it, in your mind, that you think the government actually produces?
It just think it's hilarious that you're expressing implicitly that you have a right to your own taxed income.
When you got those grants for repairs, did you double check the grant didn't exceed what everyone payed in income taxes?
I didn't get the grant, dunderhead - the county did. Need the number to the courthouse? You can call there and dazzle them with your stupidity, vs. wasting it here on a message board.
Romney said we need to cut back on the number of cops.